期刊文献+

基于2012版病案首页的医院治疗质量的评价 被引量:4

Hospital quality of care appraisal based on the 2012 medical record front page
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨2012版病案首页的治疗质量的评价方法。方法选取我院2012版病案首页中人院途径及离院方式的出院患者信息,运用列联表法进行评价。结果差异性检验结果表明不同途径入院的离院方式间的差异具有统计学意义(X^2=856.55,P〈0.05)。相关性分析表明不同途径人院的患者与离院方式之间的Spearman相关系数为-0.11(P〈0.05)。在此基础上得到全院治疗质量的得分为4.95。结论评价体系的建立表明2012版病案首页下治疗质量的指标设置更为科学,评价结果也更加客观。 Objective To explore an evaluation method of quality of care using the 2012 medical record front page. Methods The admission pathway and discharge method information of inpatients discharge recorded in the medical record front pages of the hospital were chosen and evaluated with contingency tables. Results The outcomes indicated that the differences between discharge methods of those admitted through different pathways are significant statistically (Z2= 856.55, P~ 0. 05). The correlation analysis showed that the coefficient of Spearman correlation between the inpatients admitted through different pathways and their discharge methods was --0. 11 (P〈0. 05). Calculated as such, the score of quality of care was 4.95 for the hospital as a whole. Conclusion The establishment of this evaluation system showed that the indicators set for quality of care using the 2012 medical record front page are scientific, and the results are more objective.
出处 《中华医院管理杂志》 北大核心 2013年第7期511-513,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
关键词 病案首页 治疗质量 评价 Medical record front page Quality of care Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献30

共引文献89

同被引文献42

  • 1朱玲,尹琼.住院病案首页填写问题分析及改进[J].中国病案,2020,0(1):20-22. 被引量:34
  • 2郭超.某医院1000份住院病案首页缺陷问题分析[J].中国病案,2020,0(1):11-13. 被引量:15
  • 3Milton C. Archiving the Plienome: Clinical RecordsDesftrve Long-term Preservation[J]. Journal of AmericanMedical Infomiatics Assooialion, 20(^, 16(1): 1-6.
  • 4Goldfield N. The evolution of diagnosis-relatedgroups (DR(is): from its beginnings inCase-mix andresource ust* theory, to its implementation for paymentand now for its currentutilization for quality within amioutside the hospital[Jj. Quality Management in HealthCare,2010, 19(1): 3-16.
  • 5Lehtonen T. DRG-has-ed prospective pricing andoase-mix aocounting-Exploring the mechanisms ofsuccesHful implem.ntation[J]. Management AccountingReseareh, 2006, 18(2007): 367-395.
  • 6Haliasos N , Rezajoni K, O' neill KS,#.tal.Financial and (.linical governant-e implicationsof oliniral coding a<'curary in neurosurgery:a multidisciplinary audit[J].Br J N eurosurg ,2010,24(2):191-195.
  • 7Grit N.Applied simulation model for design ofimproving medical record and in out-patient cleptwlnieiit(OPD) of a governmental hospttalfJJ.Proctxiia - SoriaJ andBehaviors丨 Sciences, 2013,101(8): 147—158.
  • 8Dinu I),Dragf>n I.Kequest redirection paradigm ininrngt archive implementation[J].('f.iiputer Methtxlsand Programs in Biomecii€ine,2012,107(2): 111-121.
  • 9Hammoud MM,Dalymple JL,(lhristner JG'etal.Medical Student Dofumentation in Electronic HealthRecords: A Collaborative Stateramil From the Alliancefor Clinical Edu<-ation[J]. Teaching and learning inmedicine, 2012, 24 .3): 257-266.
  • 10中华人民共和围卫生部.卫生部关于修订仲院病案白‘负的通知[EB/OL][2011-11-02]http://www.moh.gov.on/too—hyzs/s3585/20111l/53492.shtml.

引证文献4

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部