期刊文献+

人事选拔中的应聘者反应研究述评

A Review of Applicant Reactions in Personnel Selection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 应聘者反应是个体在选拔情境下由公平知觉导致的一种针对组织的态度或行为后果。应聘者反应的首个理论模型是Gilliland的选拔公正模型,随后,启发模型、整合模型和信任模型相继建立,极大丰富了应聘者反应的理论内涵。然而,应聘者反应的测量明显滞后于理论的发展,主要表现在测量工具不统一、测量结构混乱、信效度研究匮乏等方面。未来的研究方向有:(1)加强现有模型中论证不充分的环节;(2)进一步丰富跨文化研究;(3)从一般性问题向特定情境的研究进行深入;(4)结合跨领域内容,朝着多元化的方向发展。 Applicant reactions are the attitudinal or behavioral outcomes resulting from justice perceptions under the selection context. The first recognized theoretical model of applicant reactions comes up with Gilliland's organizational justice model. After that, heuristic model, updated model and trust model are proposed, leading to a rapid growth in the theory. The measurement of applicant reactions, however, has not been well developed. The major shortfalls include the inconsistency of the measures, the chaos of the measuring structure, and the paucity of reliability and validity research. A few possible directions for future study are propounded in the end of the paper, which are (1) to focus more on the less examined but influential factors in the models, (2) to enrich the cross-cultural research, (3) to shift from the general contexts to the specific ones, and (4) to broaden the research vision by combining the neighboring domains of study.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第7期1317-1330,共14页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(06JAXLX001)
关键词 应聘者反应 公平知觉 程序公正 applicant reactions justice perceptions procedural justice
  • 相关文献

参考文献79

  • 1Alexander,S,Ruderman,M. The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior[J].Social Justice Research,1987.177-198.
  • 2Anderson,N,Ahmed,S,Costa,A.C. Applicant reactions in Saudi Arabia:Organizational attractiveness and core-self evaluation[J].International Journal of Selection and Assessment,2012.197-208.
  • 3Anderson,N,Salgado,J.F,Htülsheger,U.R. Applicant reactions in selection:Comprehensive mcta-analysis into reaction generalization versus situational specificity[J].International Journal of Selection and Assessment,2010.291-304.
  • 4Anderson,N,Witvliet,C. Fairness reactions to personnel selection methods:An international comparison between the Netherlands,the United States,France,Spain,Portugal,and Singapore[J].International Journal of Selection and Assessment,2008.1-13.
  • 5Arvey,R.D,Sackett,P-R. Fairness in selection:Current developments and perspectives[A].San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers,1993.171-202.
  • 6Arvey,R.D,Strickland,W,Drauden,G,Clessen,M. Motivational components of test taking[J].Personnel Psychology,1990.695-716.
  • 7Bauer,T.N,Truxillo,D.M,Sanchez,R,Craig,J,Ferrara,E,& Campion,M.A. Applicant reactions to selection:Development of the selection procedural justice scale (SPJS)[J].Personnel Psychology,2001.387-419.
  • 8Bauer,T.N,Truxillo,D.M,Tucker,J.S,Weathers,V Bertolino,M Erdogan,B & Campion,M.A. Selection in the information age:The impact of privacy concerns and computer experience on applicant reactions[J].Journal of Management,2006.601-621.
  • 9Bell,B.S,Wiechmann,D,Ryan,A.M. Consequences of organizational justice expectations in a selection system[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2006.455-466.
  • 10Bertolino,M,Steiner,D.D. Fairness reactions to selection methods:An Italian study[J].International Journal of Selection and Assessment,2007.197-205.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部