期刊文献+

鼻咽癌疗后骨转移程度对预后的影响 被引量:1

Prognostic impact of degree of bone metastasis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiochemotherapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析鼻咽癌放化疗后骨转移程度对预后的影响。方法回顾分析1997—2007年间在南方医院接受放化疗且疗后有骨转移的109例鼻咽癌患者的预后。Kaplan—Meier法计算生存率,Logrank法单因素预后分析,Cox回归模型多因素预后分析。结果5年随访率为97.2%。全组患者1、2、3、5年总生存率分别为67.9%、48.6%、32.9%、17.4%。全组骨转移数≤3个(43例)与〉3个(66例)的1、2、3、5年生存率分别为90.7%与53.0%、81.4%与27.3%、72.1%与6.2%、34.9%与4.2%(P=0.000)。骨转移数〉3个中有与无合并其他部位转移的1、2、3、5年生存率分别为56.5%与72.1%、21.7%与30.2%、3.1%与13.0%、0.0%与6.5%(P=0.866)。多因素分析显示骨转移数目〉3是影响预后的因素(P=0.000)。结论鼻咽癌疗后骨转移灶数目增多是影响预后的重要因素,但是否需较积极治疗尚待探究以进一步完善鼻咽癌分期系统。 Objective To analyze the prognostic impact of degree of bone metastasis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma ( NPC ) after radiochemotherapy. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the prognosis of 109 NPC patients who had bone metastases after radiochemotherapy in Nan_fang Hospital from June 1997 to December 2007. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates; the log-rank test was used for univariate prognostic analysis; the Cox regression model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis. Results The 5-year follow-up rate was 97. 2%. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5- year overall survival rates for all patients were 67.9%, 48.6%, 32. 9%, and 17.4%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for the 43 patients with not more than 3 bone metastases and the 66 patients with more than 3 bone metastases were 90. 7% vs. 53.0% , 81.4% vs. 27. 3% , 72. 1% vs. 6. 2% , and 34. 9% vs. 4. 2%, respectively (P= 0.000). In the patients with more than 3 bone metastases, the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for those with and without other metastatic sites were 56. 5% vs. 72. 1%, 21.7% vs. 30. 2%, 3. 1% vs. 13.0%, and 0.0% vs. 6. 5%, respectively (P= 0. 866 ). The multivariate analysis showed that more than 3 bone metastases were an adverse prognostic factor in the patients ( P = 0. 000). Conclusions The number of bone metastases is an important prognostic factor in NPC patients after radiochemotherapy. Patients with not more than 3 bone metastases have better survival than those with more than 3 bone metastases, and aggressive treatment should be considered. In addition, the staging system of NPC needs to be improved.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期299-302,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
基金 广东省自然科学基金(S2011010003915) 广东省科技计划项目(20108031600245)
关键词 鼻咽肿瘤 放射疗法 鼻咽肿瘤 化学疗法 骨转移 预后 Nasopharyngeal neoplasms/radiotherapy Nasopharyngeal neoplasms/chemotherapy Bone metastasis Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献40

  • 1梁翠微,杨兵,李小亮,孙达春.紫杉醇联合顺铂、5-氟尿嘧啶治疗晚期鼻咽癌的临床观察[J].现代肿瘤医学,2006,14(1):14-15. 被引量:6
  • 2潘建基,林少俊,张瑜,陈传本,郑茁,郑葳.鼻咽癌调强放疗初步结果[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2006,13(20):1553-1555. 被引量:20
  • 3刘源,陈明,赵充,卢丽霞,韩非,包勇,黄劭敏,邓小武,卢泰祥,崔念基.鼻咽癌患者调强放射治疗后颞颌关节损伤及其影响因素[J].癌症,2007,26(1):64-67. 被引量:37
  • 4张春,潘建基,张瑜,柏朋刚,张秀春,王根桃.鼻咽癌适形调强放疗对腮腺功能影响的前瞻性研究[J].实用癌症杂志,2007,22(4):380-383. 被引量:8
  • 5Lee N, Xia P, Quivey JM, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the UCSF experience [J]. Int J Radiat Oneol Biol Phys, 2002,53 ( 1 ) : 12-22.
  • 6Kam MK, Teo PM, Chau RM, et al. Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: the Hong Kong experience [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2004,60(5) : 1440-1450.
  • 7Lee AW, Sze WM, Au JS, et al. Treatment results tor nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the modern era: The Hong Kong experience [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2005,61(4): 1107-1116.
  • 8Chau RM, Teo PM, Kam MK, et al. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brain and spinal cord [J]. Med Dosim, 2007,32(4):263-270.
  • 9Waldron J, Tin MM, Keller A, et al. Limitation of conventional two dimensional radiation therapy planning in nasopharyngeal carcinoma [J]. Radiother Oncol, 2003,68 (2):153-161.
  • 10Kam MK, Chau RM, Suen J, et al. Intenslty-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: dosimetrie advantage over conventional plans and feasibility of dose escalation[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2003,56(1): 145-157.

共引文献231

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部