期刊文献+

DNA损伤修复基因XRCC4、RAD51单核苷酸多态性与中国地区食管癌易感相关性研究 被引量:7

The Study of Esophageal Cancer Risk Associated with Polymorphisms of DNA Damage Repair Genes XRCC4 and RAD51
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探究DNA双链断裂修复基因XRCC4、RAD51单核苷酸多态性与食管癌易感性的关系。方法采用以医院为基础的病例-对照研究方法,应用PCR限制性内切酶片段长度多态性(PCR-RFLP)检测包括正常对照61例,食管癌患者123例XRCC4基因启动子区G-1394T(rs6869366)位点,以及RAD51-G135C位点的单核苷酸多态性。通过logistic回归分析计算出比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。结果 XRCC4rs6869366位点G等位基因的基因型(GT+GG)的携带者患食管癌的风险显著增加(OR=3.022,95%CI=1.487~6.142,P=0.002)。RAD51基因型GC和CC与携带GG的野生型个体相比,携带RAD51变异基因型(GC和CC)的个体具有更高的患癌风险(OR=3.643,95%CI=1.501~8.842,P<0.05)。结论 DNA损伤修复系统中的基因多态性很可能与食管癌发生的易感性有关,XRCC4G-1394T,RAD51-G135C位点多态性改变均可增加食管癌的发病风险。 Objective Investigate the association between genetic polymorphism of DSBs repair gene XRCC4, RAD51 and susceptibility to esophageal cancer (EC). Methods A hospital based case-control study with 123 EC cases and 61 controls in a Chinese population was conducted. PCR-RFLP was applied to investigate the genotype of XRCC4 promoter G-1394T (rs6869366) and RAD51-G135C and then statistical analysis was conducted by calculating the adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results A significant difference of XRCC4-1394 polymorphism was observed between EC cases and controls (P〈0.05). Carriers of the XRCC4 rs6869366 G allele (GCq-GG) were at a higher risk of developing EC with the TT genotype as reference (OR= 3. 022, 95%CI= 1. 487-6. 142, P= 0. 002). When GG served as the reference group of RAD51-G135C allele, variant genotype (GC and CC) had a significant increased risk of lung cancer (OR=3. 643,95 %CI= 1. 501-8. 842, P〈0.05). Conclusion Our findings indicated that genetic variants in DNA repair pathways may be involved in esophageal tumorigenesis. XRCC4 G-1394T and RAD51-G135C conferred risk for the process of developing EC.
出处 《四川大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期568-572,共5页 Journal of Sichuan University(Medical Sciences)
基金 教育部博士点基金新教师项目(No.20070610124) 教育部留学回国人员启动基金项目(No.2008890-19-11)资助
关键词 XRCC4 RAD51 食管癌 单核苷酸多态性 XRCC4 RAD51 Esophageal cancer Single nucleotide polymorphism
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Xing D, Tan W, Lin D. Genetic polymorphisms and susceptibility to esophageal cancer among Chinese population (review). Oncol Rep, 2003; 10(5): 1615-1623.
  • 2Hiyama T, Yoshihara M, Tanaka S, et al . Genetic polymorphisms and esophageal cancer risk. Int J Cancer, 2007 ; 121(8):1643-1658.
  • 3Goode EL, Ulrich CM, Potter JD. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev,2002;11(12) :1513-1530.
  • 4Qiao GB, Wu YL, Yang XN, et al . High-level expression of Rad51 is an independent prognostic marker of survival in non?small-cell lung cancer patients. Br J Cancer, 2005; 93 (1) : 137- 143.
  • 5Rollinson S, Smith AG, Allan JM, et al . RAD51 homologous recombination repair gene haplotypes and risk of acute myeloid leukaemia. Leuk Res,2007;31(2) :169-174.
  • 6Poplawski T, Arabski M, Kozirowska D, et al . DNA damage and repair in gastric cancer--a correlation with the hOGG1 and RAD51 genes polymorphisms. Mutat Res, 2006; 601 (1-2): 83-91.
  • 7Richardson C, Stark JM, ommundsen M, et al . Rad51 overexpression promotes alternative double-strand break repair pathways and genome instability. Oncogene, 2004; 23 (2) : 546- 553.
  • 8Bhatia D, Gerbing RB, Alonzo TA, et al . DNA repair polymorphisms and outcome of chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia: a report from the Children's Ontology Group. Leukemia,2008;22(2) :265-272.
  • 9Sung, P, Klein H. Mechanism of homologous recombination: mediators and helicases take on regulatory functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,2006;7(10): 739-750.
  • 10杨乐平,谭兴国,杨竹林,李清龙,苗雄鹰.胰腺癌大鼠RAD51和MAX的表达[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2010,35(2):146-151. 被引量:3

二级参考文献20

  • 1Richardson C. RAD5 1 , genomic stability, and tumorigenesis [J]. Cancer Lett, 2005, 218(1) :127-139.
  • 2Klein H L. The consequences of Rad51 over-expression for nomal and tumor cells [ J ] . DNA Repair ( Amst ) , 2008 , 7 (5) :686-693.
  • 3Bahassi E M, Ovesen J L, Riesenberg A L, et al. The checkpoint kinase chk 1 and chk 2 regulate the functional associations between hBRCA2 and Rad 51 in response to DNA damage [J]. Oncogene, 2008,27(28) :3977-3985.
  • 4Adimoolam S, Sirisawad W, Chen J, et al. ItDAC inhibitor PC 1-24781 decrease RAD51 expression and inhibits homologous recombination [ J ]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104(49) :19484-19487.
  • 5Maacke H, Jost H, Opitz S, et al. DNA repair and recombination factor Rad51 is over-expressed in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma [ J ]. Oncogene, 2000, 19 ( 21 ) : 2791 -2795.
  • 6Webb P M, Hopper J L, Newman B, et al. Double-strand break repair gene polymorphims and risk of breast or ovarian cancer [ J ] . Cancer Epidemiol Biomarker Prev, 2005 , 14(2) :319-323.
  • 7Kretzner L, Blackwood E M, Eisenman R N. Myc and max proteins possess distinct trancriptional activities [ J ]. Nature, 1992,359(6394) :426-429.
  • 8Mac Partlin M, Homer E, Robinson H, et al. Interactions of the DNA mismatch repair proteins MLH1 and MSH2 with C-Myc and MAX[J]. Oncogene, 2003, 22(6) : 819- 825.
  • 9Hurlin P J, Huang J. The MAX-interacting transciption factor network [J]. Semin Cancer Biol,2006, 16 (14) : 265 -274.
  • 10Hurlin P J, Degouli S. Funtions of Myc : max in the control of cell proliferation and tumorigenesis [ J ]. Int Rev Cytol, 2004,238(2) :183-226.

共引文献2

同被引文献96

引证文献7

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部