1Massoumzadeh P, Don S, Hildebolt, et al. Validation of CT dosereduction simulation[J]. Med Phys, 2009,36(1):174-189.
2Bai M, Chen J, Raupach R, et al. Effect of nonlinear three- dimensional optimized reconstruction algorithm filter on image quality and radiation dose:vafidation on phantoms[J]. Med phys, 2009,36( 1 ):95-97.
3Prasad SR, Wittram C, Shepard JA, et al. Standard-dose and 50%-reduced-dose ccest CT:comparing the effect on image quality[J]. AJR, 2002,179(2):461-465.
4Nitta N, Takahashi H, Murata K, et al.Ultra low dose helical CT of the chest: evaluation in clinican cases[J]. Radiat Med, 1999,17 (1):1-7.
5Frush DP, Applegate K. Computed tomography and radiation un- derstanding the issues[J]. J Am Coil Radiol, 2004,1:113-119.
6Brenner D J, Hall EJ. Ccomputed tomogTaphy:an increasing sourceof radiation exposure[J]. N Engl J Med, 2007,2277-2284.
7Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS, et al. Comparison of radiation doses from muhislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2006,47:1840-1845.
8Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hemann F, et al. Estimated radiation does associated with cardiac CT angiography[J]. JAMA, 2009, 301 (5):500-507.
9Abada HT, Larchez C, Daoud B, et al. MDCT of the coronary arterles:feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose[J]. AJR,2006,186(z2):S387- S390.
10Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, et al. Feasibility of lowdose coronary CT angiography:first experience with prospective ECG-gating[J]. Eur Heart J, 2008,29(2):153-154.
