期刊文献+

胜诉方负担民事诉讼费用研究——由深圳中院诉讼费用复核第一案引发的思考 被引量:4

A Study on Prevailing Party Bearing Litigation Expense——A Thinking Arising from the First Case about Litigation Expense Bearing Re-examination from Shenzhen Intermediate Court
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当事人有限度负担诉讼费用和败诉方负担诉讼费用是各国诉讼费用负担规则通行做法。但司法实践表明,机械、绝对地适用败诉方负担诉讼费用规则会产生假性正义而背离公平和正义。在特殊情形下,由胜诉方负担诉讼费用符合法律所追求的公平正义原则,应当借鉴国外民事诉讼费用负担规则基础上,结合我国实体法的规定和具体案例,确定民事诉讼胜诉方负担诉讼费用规则。 The parties shall bare limited civil litigation expenses and litigation expenses shall be born by the losing party,which are the common practices. Many civil eases indicate that inflexible and absolute rules will lead to fraud justice, which goes against fairness and justice. Under certain circumstances, it is justified that prevailing party bears the litigation expense. We should learn rules of litigation expenses from other countries and areas and establish that the prevailing party should bear the litigation expense based on our entity rules and judicial nractio,~
作者 廖森林
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《河南财经政法大学学报》 北大核心 2013年第4期169-177,共9页 Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
关键词 民事诉讼 败诉 胜诉 诉讼费用负担 civil action win a lawsuit lose a lawsuit litigation expense bearing
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献8

  • 1李培锋.为现代视角置入缺席的语境[J].读书,2002(1):70-74. 被引量:5
  • 2[3]樊崇义.刑事诉讼法实施问题与对策研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.129.
  • 3[3]巫宇苏.证据学[M].北京:群众出版社,1985:19.
  • 4[4]Indirect:Richard O.Lempert &Stephen A.Saltzburg,A Modern Approach to Evidence,West Publishing Co.1982,P.153.
  • 5[5]罗伯斯比尔.革命法制和审判[M].赵涵舆译.北京:商务印书馆,1965:125.
  • 6[11]David M.Paciocco & Lee Stuesser,The Law of Evidence,published by Irwin law 1996,p.4.
  • 7[美]博西格诺等.法律之门[M].邓子滨译.北京:华夏出版社,2002.661.
  • 8刁荣华.比较刑事证据法各论[M].台北:汉林出版社,1984,5..

共引文献83

同被引文献10

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部