支撑喉镜联合喉内窥镜与支撑喉镜治疗喉部良性肿物的疗效对比研究

The Comparison Study of Retaining Laryngoscope Combined Nasal Endoscope Laryngoscope and Retaining Laryngoscope on Treating Laryngeal Benign Tumor

目的:探讨支撑喉镜联合喉内窥镜及支撑喉镜两者治疗喉部良性肿物的疗效。方法:选取本院2010年10月-2012年12月收治的喉部良性肿物患者160例,根据治疗方法不同,分为两组(对照组与试验组)。对照组70例采用支撑喉镜治疗;试验组90例采用支撑喉镜联合喉内窥镜治疗。结果:对照组治愈率57.1%(40/70),好转率25.7%(18/70),无效率17.1%(12/70),总有效率为82.9%;试验组治愈率76.7%(69/90),好转率17.8%(16/90),无效率5.6%(5/90),总有效率为94.4%。对照组与试验组的术后并发症发生率分别为22.9%与4.4%。结论:支撑喉镜联合喉内镜对喉部良性肿物治疗有效,具有微创、并发症少等优点,有较高临床价值。

Objective：To observe the efficacy of both retaining laryngoscope combined nasal endoscope laryngoscope and retaining laryngoscope treatment of benign tumor of the larynx.Method：Selected 160 cases of benign throat tumor patients in our hospital from October 2010 to December 2012, according to the different treatment methods,They were divided into two groups（control group and the experimental group）,the control group were applied with retaining laryngoscope treatment（70 cases）,the experimental group were applied with retaining laryngoscope combined nasal endoscope laryngoscope treatment（90 cases）.Result：In the control group,the cure rate was 57.1%（40/70）,the improvement rate was 25.7%（18/70）, invalid for 17.1%（12/70）,the total effective rate was 82.9%.In the experimental group,the cure rate was 76.7%（69/90）,the improvement rate was 17.8%（16/90）,invalid 5.6%（5/90）,with a total effective rate was 94.4%.Postoperative complication of the control group and the experimental group was 22.9% and 4.4% respectively.Conclusion：The operation of retaining laryngoscope combined nasal endoscope laryngoscope has effective treatment for benign throat mass,with a minimally invasive,fewer complications,etc,and has a higher clinical value.