期刊文献+

髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折治疗效果分析 被引量:4

Analysis Hip Replacement Periprosthetic Fractures of Femur after Treatment Effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的治疗效果。方法:选择54例行髋关节置换术后出现股骨假体周围骨折的患者,按随机数字表法分为观察组与对照组,观察组27例行锁定钢板内固定治疗,对照组27例行合金记忆形状环抱器内固定治疗。结果:治疗后,两组患者均随访9~22个月,观察组骨折愈合时间9~22个月,患侧肢体的负重恢复时间4~7.8个月,髋关节功能评分(84.67±8.96)分;对照组骨折愈合时间12~24个月,患侧肢体的负重恢复时间6~10.5个月,髋关节功能评分(72.12±8.78)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:髋关节置换术后给予患者行锁定钢板内固定治疗股骨假体周围骨折效果显著,术后髋关节功能评分优于合金记忆形状环抱器内固定,值得临床推广应用。 Objective:To discuss therapeutic effect of around the femoral prosthesis fracture after hip replacement.Method:To choose 54cases of patients hip in patients with femoral fracture around the prosthesis,according to random number table method divided into observation group and control group,the observation group and routine locking plate internal fixation treatment,control group and regular shape memory alloy embracing internal fixation treatment. Result:The two groups of patients were followed up for 9-22 months in after treatment,the observation group fracture healing time was 9-22 months,the weight recovery time of the affected limb 4-7.8 months,hip score(84.67±8.96),and control group with fracture healing time was 12-24 months,the weight recovery time of the affected limb 6-10.5 months hip score(72.12±8.78),the difference was statistically significant(P &lt;0.05). Conclusion:The hip arthroplasty give to patients locking plate fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures significant postoperative hip score better than the alloy shape memory embracing fixed,is worthy to carry out the promotion of clinical application.
作者 杨昌宇
出处 《中国医学创新》 CAS 2013年第19期112-113,共2页 Medical Innovation of China
关键词 股骨假体周围骨折 髋关节置换 骨折愈合 Periprosthetic femoral fractures Hip replacement Fracture healing
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献113

共引文献54

同被引文献56

  • 1王建云,姜世平,何健飞,蒋兴粒,李俊歧.形状记忆合金环抱器或钛捆绑带治疗髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(5):400-401. 被引量:21
  • 2黄海,卫小春.髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的分型[J].实用骨科杂志,2007,13(8):475-476. 被引量:12
  • 3Ninan TM, Costa ML, Krikler SJ. Classification of femoral peripros-thetic fractures [J]. Injury,2007,38(6):661-668.
  • 4Kyle RF, Haas JC, Yoon P. Periprosthetic Femur Fractures[A]. In:Wiss Da ed. Master Techniques in Orthopaedic Surgery: Fractures[M]. 2nd ed. USA:Lippincott Williams and Wilkins,2006:766-782.
  • 5Lindahl, Malchau H, Herberts P, et al. Periprosthetic femoral frac-tures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femo-ral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register[J]. J Arthroplasty,2005,20(7):857-865.
  • 6Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regner H,et al. Three hundred and twen-ty-one periprosthetic femoral fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2006,88(6):1215-1222.
  • 7Kobbe P, Klemn R, Reilmann H, et al. Less invasive stabilizationsystem (LISS) for the treatment of periosthetic femoral fracture:狂3-year follow-up [J]. Injury, 2008,39(4):472-479.
  • 8TsiridisE, Narvani AA, Haddad FS,et al. Impaction femoral allo-grafting and cemented revision for periprosthetic femoral fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Br),2004,86(8): 1124-1132.
  • 9Schmidtah,Kylerf. periprosthetic fracture of femur [J]. Orthop ClinNorth Am,2002,33(3):143-152.
  • 10Macdonald SJ, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, et al.Periprostheticfemoral fractures treated with a long stem cementless component[J]. J Arthroplasty,2001,16(3):379-383.

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部