期刊文献+

伊曲康唑口服液与氟康唑预防急性白血病并粒细胞减少患者真菌感染的疗效分析 被引量:9

Clinical analysis on the effect of itraconazole oral solution versus fluconazole in the prevention of fungal infection in neutropenic patients with acute leukemia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较伊曲康唑口服液与氟康唑预防急性白血病并粒细胞减少患者真菌感染的疗效和耐受性。方法急性白血病并粒细胞减少患者84例随机分为伊曲康唑口服液组及氟康唑组各42例,观察两组对预防真菌感染的临床效果,相关死亡率及副作用。结果 84例中可评估患者75例,39例接受氟康唑预防,10例发生真菌感染,其中侵袭性真菌感染6例;36例接受伊曲康唑口服液患者,3例发生真菌感染,均为表浅真菌感染,总感染率分别为25.6%和8.3%,伊曲康唑口服液组总真菌感染率和侵袭性真菌感染率显著低于氟康唑组;因真菌感染发生死亡患者在伊曲康唑口服液组及氟康唑组分别为1例和5例,无统计学意义。两种抗真菌药患者均可耐受。结论应用伊曲康唑口服液可预防和显著减少真菌感染,尤其是深部真菌感染率,且安全、可耐受。 Objective To compare the efficacy of intraconazole oral solution and fluconazole in preventing fungal infection in neutropenic patients with acute leukemia and the patients' tolerance to them.Methods 84 patients with acute leukemia of neutropenic patients were randomly assigned to receive itraconazole oral solution and fluconazole to prevent fungal infection.The rate of fungal infections,related mortality and the side effects were observed.Results 75 patients were assessed.Clinical fungal infections occurred in 10 among 39 patients in fluconazole group,and 3 among 36 patients in itraconazole oral solution group.6 patients with invasive fungal infections only occurred in fluconazole group.Overall rate of fungal infections is 25.6% and 8.3% respectively.The incidence of fungal infection and invasive fungal infections were significantly lower in the itraconazole oral solution group than in the fluconazole group.The incidence of fungal infection-related mortality wasn't significantly different in two groups.All patients can be tolerant of the two drugs.Conclusion Itraconazole oral solution for the prevention of fungal infection can decrease the rate of fungal infections and invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients with acute leukemia and was tolerated.
出处 《西部医学》 2013年第7期987-989,共3页 Medical Journal of West China
关键词 伊曲康唑口服液 氟康唑 急性白血病 粒细胞减少 Itraconazole oral solution Fluconazole Fungal infection acute leukemia Neutropenia
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Mattiuzzi G, Alvarado G, Alvarez R,etal. Causes of death in pa- tients with acute myelogenous leukemia and high-risk myelodys- plastic syndrome undergoing induction chemotherapy[J]. Blood, 2003,102(11) ,878.
  • 2Ascioglu S, Rex JH, Pauw BD, et al. Defining opportunistic in- vasive fungal infections in immunocompromiscd patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: an international consensus[J]. Clin Infect Dis,2002,34(1) ,7-14.
  • 3Walsh TJ, Pappas P, Winston DJ, et al. Voriconazole compared with [iposomal amphoteriein B for empirical antifungaI therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever[J]. N Engl J Med, 2002,346(4) ; 225-234.
  • 4RiedeI A, Choe L, Inciardl J, et al. Antifungal prophylaxis in chemotherapy-associated neutropenia: a retrospective, observa- tional study[J]. BME infectious Diseases,2007,7,70-77.
  • 5Cornely OA, :hme A,Buchheidt D,et al. Primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients with hematologic malig- nancies. Recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society for Haematology and Oncology[J]. haematologica ,2009,94(1) :113-122.
  • 6Huijgens PC, Simoons-Smit AM, Loenen AC, et al. Fluconazole versus intraeonazole o for the prevention of fungal infections in patients in haemato-oncology[J]. J Clin Pathol , 1999,52(5), 376 - 380.
  • 7Harousseau JL, Dekker AW, Stamatoullas-Bastard A, et al. Itraeonazole Oral Solution for Primary Prophylaxis of Fungal In- fections in Patients with Hematological Malignancy and Profound Neutropenia, a Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Placebo, Multicenter Trial Comparing Itraconazole and Amphotericin B [J]. Antimierobial agent and chemotherapy, 2000,44 (7), 1887 - 1893.
  • 8Comely OA, Maertens J, Winston DJ, et al. Posaeonazole vs fluconazole or itraeonazole prophylaxis in patients with neutrope- nia[J]. N Engl J Med,2007,356(4) ,348-59.

同被引文献56

引证文献9

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部