期刊文献+

极性强化词的语义走向——以absolutely为例

The Semantic Paths of Maximizers——A Case of absolutely
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以absolutely为例,结合共时与历时主观化框架,对英语极性强化词的语义演化路径加以追踪,发现abso-lutely的意义体现了客观义<主观义<交互主观义的单向演进趋势。对照汉语对应成分"极",可以发现英汉对应范畴在语义演化路径上存在一定的共通性。 This paper attempts to trace the semantic paths of English maximizers. Based on a case study of absolutely within an integrated framework of synchronic and diaehronie approach to subjeetification, it is found that absolutely embodies a unidirectional tenden- cy: objective sense 〈 subjective sense 〈 intersubjeetive sense. A comparison with its Chinese counterpart "Ji" reveals considerable commonalities between English maximizers and their Chinese counterparts in terms of paths of semantic change.
作者 黄蓓
出处 《长春大学学报》 2013年第7期851-855,共5页 Journal of Changchun University
关键词 极性强化词 语义走向 absolutely “极” 主观化 maximizers semantic path absolutely "Ji" subjectifieation
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1文旭,黄蓓.极性程度副词“极”的主观化[J].外语研究,2008,25(5):9-13. 被引量:29
  • 2黄蓓.主观性研究的两种取向——共性·差异·互补性[J].四川教育学院学报,2011,27(2):52-59. 被引量:3
  • 3Langacker R W. Subjectification [ J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1990,1 (1) :5 -38.
  • 4Langacker R W. On subjectification and grammaticalization [ C ]// Koenig J P. Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 1998 : 75.
  • 5Langacker R W. Grammar and Conceptualization [ M ]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999.
  • 6Traugott E C. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English : an example of subjectification in semantic change [ J ]. Language, 1989, 57(1).
  • 7Traugott E C. The Role of the Development of Discourse Markers in a Theory of Grammaticalization [ C ]//Paper presented at the 12th Intemational Conference on Historical Linguistics. Manchester:U- niversity of Manchester, August, 1995:304.
  • 8Huang B. The Subjectivity and Subjectification of Deadjectival In- tensifiers [ D -. Thesis M A. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2009:45 - 60.
  • 9Paradis C. It' s well weird. Degree modifiers of adjectives revisi- ted : the nineties E C ] -//Kirk J. Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2000 : 147 - 160.
  • 10Paradis C. Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of degree[ J]. English Language and Linguistics, 2008, 12(4) : 317 - 343.

二级参考文献15

  • 1沈家煊.语言的“主观性”和“主观化”[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(4):268-275. 被引量:2264
  • 2Traugott,E.C.Subjectification in grammaticalization[C] //Subjectivity and subjectivisation:Linguistic Per-spectives.Ed.Stein Dieter and Susan Wright.Cam-bridge:Cambridge University Press,1995:32-54.
  • 3Langacker,R.W.Subjectification,grammaticization,and conceptual archetypes[M] //Subjectification:Vail-Ous Paths to Subjectivity.Athanasiadou.A.et al.Ber-lin:Mouton de Gruyter,CLR 31,2006:17-40.
  • 4Traugott,E.C.and R.B.Dasher.Regularity in Se-mantic Change[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002.
  • 5Verhagan,A.Construal and perspectivization[C] //The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Lingstics.Ed.Geeraerts,Dirk & Hubert Cuyekens.Cambridge:Cam-bridge University Press,2007:48-81.
  • 6Company,C.Zero in syntax,ten in prag Tnatics:sub-jectification and syntactic cancellation[C] //Subjeetifi-cation:Various Paths to Subjectivity Ed.Angeliki Atha-nasiadou et al.Berlin/New York:Mouton de Gruyter,2006.348-375.
  • 7Langaeker,R.W.Observations and speculations on sub-jectivity[M] //Iconieity in Syntax.John Halmall.Am-sterdam:Benjamins,1985:109-150.
  • 8Langacker,R.W.Grnmmar and Conceptualization[M].Berlin/New York:Mouton de Gruyter,1999.
  • 9Langaeker,R.W.subjectification[J].Cognitive Lin-guistics,1990,1(1):5-38.
  • 10Langacker,R.W.On 8ubjectification and grammatical-ization[M] //Discourse and Cognition:Bridging the Gap.Koenig,J.-P.CSLI Publications,Stanford,1998:71-89.

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部