期刊文献+

支持部队模拟训练的指控与仿真系统互操作性语言 被引量:1

C2&Simulation Interoperability Language for Army Simulation-based Training
下载PDF
导出
摘要 部队指控系统的广泛应用对指控训练提出更高要求。仿真系统开始越来越多地应用于训练中,为之提供真实的指控训练环境。部队模拟训练系统中实装指控系统与基于仿真的训练支撑环境的互操作性问题是一个急待解决的问题。互操作性概念参考模型用于确认两者间交互的信息类型,是互操作性研究的基础。模拟训练系统中互操作性研究的重点集中在指控与仿真系统互操作性语言的研究上,主要体现在公共数据模型、形式化语法和形式化语义3个方面。 As Command and Control(C2)systems are used more widely in the Army,the training on it become more important. To provide a realistic Environment for C2 training,we use more simulations. Interoperating military command and control with the Simulation-based Training Support Environment (S-TSE)in training systems is imperative. Conceptual reference model of Interoperability is developed to identify all possible types of information that could be exchanged between C2 system and S-TSE. It is the foundation of research for interoperability. The role of the C2&Simulation Interoperability Language as one of the key enablers,which includes Common Data Model,Formal Grammar and Formal Semantics,for the Training Systems is presented.Common Data Model is the basic data model for Command,Report and Request of the Army C2 System. The objective of the Formal Grammar is to formalize the definition of orders,requests,and reports in the Army C2 System such that they are rigorous, well documented, and parse-able. Formal Semantics will involve specification of command and control ontology to enable better interoperability between the Army C2 systems and Simulation systems.
出处 《火力与指挥控制》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期176-180,共5页 Fire Control & Command Control
关键词 指挥控制系统 仿真系统 互操作性 指控与仿真系统互操作性语言 command and control system,simulation system,interoperability,C2&Simulation interoperability language
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Donald H T, Dr Michael R H, Joseph L,et al. Report Out of the C41 Study Group [ R ].Paper 00F-SIW-O05,2000 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop.
  • 2Lacetera J, Frazier G, Wertman C, "C4ISR Systems-to-Simulations Data and Interface Lexicon," [R] .Version 2000.09.30, SISO C4ISR TRM Study Group, Orlando, Florida, 2000.
  • 3Turnitsa. Extending the Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model[ C ]//IEEE Summer Computer Simulation Conference, 2005.
  • 4Frank C, Jim C, Joseph L, et al. C4ISR/Sim Technical Reference Model Sourcebook [C]//Paper 03F-SIW-124,2003 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 2003.
  • 5Blais C,Turnitsa C, Gustavsson P. A Strategy for Ontology Research for the Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML) Product Development Group [C]//Paper 06F-SIW-003,2006 Fall Simulation Interoperability Work- shop, 2006.
  • 6Blais C, Brown D, Diallo S, et al. Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML) Phase 1 Specification Development: An Update the M&S Community [C]//Paper 09F-SIW-001,2009 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 2009.
  • 7Kunde D,Orichel T,Tolk A,et al. Harmonizing BML Approaches: Grammars and Data Models for a BML Standard [ C ]//09S-SIW-046,2009 Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 2009.
  • 8Gruber T. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications[ J ].Knowledge Acquisitio, 1993,6 (2) : 199-221.
  • 9Gruber T R. Toward PrinciPles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledege Sharing [J ].Intemational Jounal Hu- man and Computer Studies, 1993,43 (5/6):907-928.
  • 10Dean M, Sehreiber G. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference Recommendation [J/OL].World WideWebConsortium, httP://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/, 2004-02-10.

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部