摘要
股东瑕疵出资可分为未出资与出资不足,瑕疵出资对公司、已足额出资的股东以及债权人的利益有很大的危害。本文从《公司法司法解释三》第17条谈起,分析了该条文的进步性,但认为其还存在限制条件、内容、程度、方式不明确等问题。因此认为合理限制的启动条件应为危害到相关利益主体的权益,其股东权利的限制内容应控制在自益权范围内,同时提出合理限制的程度应以其实际缴纳出资的比例为基础,最后分析了合理限制的前置程序及终止条件。
Shareholders flaws contributions shall be divided into unfunded and funded, blemishes invested a great harm to the interests of company shareholders as well as creditors, has been fully funded. "Companies Act judicial interpretation of" 17 talked about the progress of the provisions, but can not deny there are still restrictions, content, extent, manner is not clear. Therefore, this paper argues that the start conditions of reasonable restrictions should be as harmful to the interests of relevant stakeholders, the restriction of the rights of its shareholders content should be controlled from the usufruct within the same time raised the degree of reasonable restrictions should be based on its actual capital contributions by the proportion of Finally, analysis of the pre-procedure reasonable restrictions and termination conditions.
出处
《宁波广播电视大学学报》
2013年第2期53-56,共4页
Journal of Ningbo Radio & TV University
关键词
瑕疵出资
股东权利
合理限制
Defects of contfibution
shareholders' rights
reasonable restrictions