摘要
目的:比较三种霍乱弧菌的检测方法,提高珠江水霍乱弧菌的检出率。方法:用荧光PCR法、胶体金法、常规培养法同时对珠江水中霍乱弧菌进行检测。结果:实时荧光PCR法共检出霍乱弧菌核酸阳性15份,胶体金法检出13份;常规细菌培养法检出11份。实时荧光法灵敏度=90.9%;特异度=98.9%;约登指数=89.8%;Kappa指数=0.81。胶体金法灵敏度=72.7%;特异度=99.4%;约登指数=72.1%;Kappa指数=0.78。结论:实时荧光PCR法与常规细菌培养法结果、胶体金法与常规细菌培养法结果比较差异具有统计学意义,可以考虑用实时荧光PCR法对大量样本进行初筛,再与分离培养法联合使用,确保霍乱病例的早发现、早诊断,其联合使用值得在基层卫生系统防治工作中推广和使用。
Objective: To compare the three detection methods to improve detection rate of Vibrio cholera in Pearl River water. Methods: Fluorescent PCR method, colloidal gold method, conventional culture method were used for detection of Vibrio cholera in Pearl River water. Results: With real - time fluorescent PCR method, fifteen Vibrio cholera strains were found positive, the sensitivity was 90.9%, the specificity was 98.9%, and the Kappa value was 0.81 ; With colloidal gold method, thirteen Vibrio cholera strains were found positive, the sensitivity was 72. 7%, the specificity was 99.4%, and the Kappa value was 0.78; With conventional bacterial culture method, eleven Vibrio cholera strains were found positive. Conclusion: The detection results of real - time fluorescent PCR method, colloidal gold method and conventional bacterial culture method had statistical difference. Real - time fluorescent PCR method is suitable for preliminary screening of large number of samples. Combination of real - time fluorescent PCR and culture method contribute to the early finding and diagnosis of cholera cases, worthy to popularize and apply in basic hygiene system.
出处
《中国卫生检验杂志》
北大核心
2013年第6期1485-1486,共2页
Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
基金
广州市卫生局医药卫生科技重点项目
广州市越秀区科技局科技计划项目
关键词
霍乱弧菌
实时荧光PCR法
常规细菌培养
胶体金法
Vibrio cholerae
Real- time fluorescent PCR method
Bacterial culture
Colloidal gold method