期刊文献+

脊柱关节病骶髂关节炎骨质侵蚀磁共振成像误诊、漏诊分析

Analyze of MRI Misdiagnosis and Missed Diagnosis for Spondylarthritis Sacroiliitis Bone Erosion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析磁共振成像(MRI)对脊柱关节病(SpA)骶髂关节炎骨质侵蚀(BE)的误诊、漏诊原因,旨在提高诊断水平。方法:对47例SpA患者骶髂关节行CT和MRI横断面扫描。以CT为对照、以关节面为单位,统计MRI对BE的误诊率和漏诊率,并分析其原因。结果:MRI的BE误诊率24.6%(28/114)、漏诊率27.0%(20/74)。误诊原因:BE周围局限性骨质增生硬化(n=8)、骨皮质与骨板下骨髓交界面不光整(n=12)、韧带部容积效应(n=4)以及图像噪声影响(n=4)。漏诊原因:BE病灶位置表浅(n=4)、BE周围骨质增生硬化(n=10)、化学位移伪影影响(n=4)以及未仔细辨认(n=2)。结论:SIJ骨质增生硬化是导致MRI误诊、漏诊BE的主要原因,全面认识各种误诊、漏诊原因有助于提高MRI对BE的诊断水平。 Objective: To analyze the reasons ofMRI misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis for spondyarthritis (SPA) sacroiliitis bone erosion (BE) in order to improve diagnostic level. Methods: The sacroiliac joints (SIJ) of patients (n=47) with SpA were underwent with CT and MRI. Compared with CT, the rates ofMRI misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis for BE were calculated respectively, and the reasons were analyzed. Results: The rate ofMRI misdiagnosis for BE was 24.6%(28/114). The rate of missed diagnosis was 27.0% (20/74). The factors of misdiagnosed included subcortex boundedness bone sclerosis (n=8), irregular margins between cortex and subcortex bone marrow (n=12), volume effect of ligament (n=4) and noise of image (n=4). The factors of missed diagnosis included superficial location(n=4), bone sclerosis(n=10), the effect of chemical shift artifacts (n=4)and careless observation (n=2). Conclusion: The main reason led to MRI misdiagnose and miss diagnose BE is bone sclerosis of sacroiliac joint. A comprehensive understanding of the reasons are contributed to improving the diagnostic level for MRI.
出处 《汕头大学医学院学报》 2013年第2期89-91,共3页 Journal of Shantou University Medical College
基金 广东省医学科学技术研究基金资助项目(A2012388)
关键词 磁共振成像 断层成像 骶髂关节炎 骨质侵蚀 诊断 magnetic resonance imaging, tomography, saeroiliitis, bone erosion, diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1WEBER U, LAMBERT R G, PEDERSEN S J, et al. Assessment of structural lesions in sacroiliac joints enhances diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging in early spondylarthritis [J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2010,62(12) : 1763-1771.
  • 2WICK M C, WEISS R J, JASCHKE W, et al. Erosions are the most relevant magnetic resonance imaging features in quantification of sacroiliac joints in ankylosing spond- ylitis[J]. J Rheumatol, 2010, 37(3) : 622-627.
  • 3DOUGADOS M, VAN DER LINDEN S, JUHLIN R, et al. The European spondylarthropathy study group preliminary criteria for the classification of spondylarthropathy[J]. ArthritisRheum, 1991, 34(10): 1218-1227.
  • 4MURPHEY M D, WETZEL L H, BRAMBLE J M, et al. Sacroiliitis: MR imaging findings[J]. Radiology, 1991, 180(1) : 239-244.
  • 5PUHAKKA K B, JURIK A G, EGUND N, et al. Imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondylarthropathy. Asses- sment of abnormalities by MR in comparison with radiog- raphyandCT[J].ActaRadiol, 2003, 44(2): 218-229.
  • 6刘源,曾庆馀,肖壮伟,王庆文,陈肃标,周修.骶髂关节炎磁共振检查意义初探[J].中华风湿病学杂志,2002,6(3):178-182. 被引量:26
  • 7黄钟杰,刘源.骶髂关节炎MRI研究概况[J].医学综述,2009,15(4):600-603. 被引量:7
  • 8VAN DER LINDEN S, VALKENBURG H A, CATS A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1984, 27 (4) : 361-368.
  • 9GONG Y, ZHENG N, CHEN S B, et al. Ten years' experience with needle biopsy in the early diagnosis of sacroiliitis [J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2012, 64(5) : 1399-1406.
  • 10WITTRAM C, WHITEHOUSE G H. Normal variation in the magnetic resonance imaging appearances of the sac- roiliac joints: pitfalls in the diagnosis of sacroiliitis[J]. ClinRadiol, 1995, 50(6): 371-376.

二级参考文献7

共引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部