摘要
学术评价是一项系统工程,关乎诸如主管部门、评价机构、期刊出版、科研人员等多方面的切身利益。由于考核评价体系的缺失或不健全,"核心期刊"和"来源期刊"就成了学术论文、研究者学术水平乃至学术期刊办刊质量的考评依据,左右着科研管理部门、评审专家的学术评价取向。从"学术评价"的文化身份及其创新使命进行考量,"学术评价"需要正本清源,回归本位。
Academic Evaluation is a systematic project,in relation to such authorities,rating agencies,periodicals published in the vital interests of researchers,and many other.Due to the lack of evaluation system is not perfect,the ' core journals' and ' source journals became academic researchers academic standards and even some academic journals evaluations are based on the quality of the magazine,about the research and management departments,the academic evaluation of the evaluation experts orientation.Consideration for these factors,we think that academic evaluation should confirm its cultural identity and its innovative mission,return to its proper place.
出处
《社会科学管理与评论》
CSSCI
2013年第2期10-15,共6页
Management and Review of Social Sciences