期刊文献+

视觉景观主观评价的"客观性"探讨--以武汉市后官湖地区景观美学评价为例 被引量:14

DISCUSSION ON THE ' OBJECTIVITY' OF SUBJECTIVE VISUAL LANDSCAPE EVALUATION: A CASE STUDY OF AESTHETIC LANDSCAPE EVALUATION ON THE HOUGUAN LAKE OF WUHAN
下载PDF
导出
摘要 景观美学评价是景观资源评价的一项重要内容。为了将主观评价法纳入科学的景观评价体系,该方法的"客观性"必须得到证实。本研究试图证明,在进行主观整体评价的过程中评价者同时也对景观的某些客观属性进行认知,且这种认知可以定性为"客观"。按照事先设计的评价流程,六名学生参与了现场景观调查,并完成格式化的评价内容。研究发现:(1)在景观美学评价中,整体美学评价与评价者对某些景观美学属性的认知判断之间存在显著的相关性,包括视觉舒适度、开阔度、景观特有性、景观多样性等。(2)评价者的认知判断可以精确地反映视域大小及平均景深等客观的景观属性。 More attention is now paying to the aesthetic value of landscape resources by the public with the development of our society and economy,and as such landscape aesthetic evaluation has become an important part of landscape resource assessment.Present prevailing landscape evaluation system is dominated by objective expert-based approach,which is based on landscape modeling and predesigned aesthetic evaluation indicator system.In contrast,due to individual's differences of aesthetic evaluators,subjective approaches have long been considered unreliable,and as such were less used in the practice of landscape assessment.To include subjective approaches into the scientific landscape evaluation system,the 'objective' contents of subjective approaches must be firstly proved.The main objective of this paper is to verify that during the process of subjective overall evaluation human does make perception of some objective landscape attributes.To facilitate the landscape survey process,a regular grid sampling(1km×1km) method is applied in this research.Correlation analysis was conducted to examine relationship between overall visual landscape evaluation(OVLE),perceived measurable visual landscape attributes(PMVLA) and measurable visual landscape attributes(MVLA),and multilevel regression analysis was also carried out to determine important factors for OVLE.
出处 《人文地理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期58-63,120,共7页 Human Geography
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(40971111) 福建省自然科学基金项目(2011J01280)
关键词 景观美学评价 景观客观属性 视觉景观感知 武汉 landscape aesthetic evaluation objective landscape attribute visual landscape perception Wuhan
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Lothian A. Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1999,44(4):177-198.
  • 2Daniel T C. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assess- ment in the 21st century[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001,54 (1-4):276-281.
  • 3Swanwick C. Landscape character assessment: guidance for England and Scotland[R]. The Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Her- itage, 2002:1-7.
  • 4Daniel T C, Boster R S. Measuring landscape esthetics: the scenic beauty estimation method[R]. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167, 1976:17-21.
  • 5US Department of the Interior. Bureau of land management manual[R]. BLM Visual Resource Management System. [2010-10-05]. [EB/OL]http://www.blm.gov.
  • 6Swanwick C, Hanley N, Termansen M. Scoping study on agricultural landscape valuation[R]. Defra, 2007:13 -21.
  • 7Gobster P H, Nassauer J I, Daniel T C, et al.. The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2007,22(7):959-972.
  • 8Zube E H. Cross-disciplinary and inter-mode agreement on the de- scription and evaluation of landscape resources[J]. Environment and Behavior, 1974,6(1):69-90.
  • 9Brown T C, Daniel T C. Scaling of ratings: concepts and methods[R]. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-293. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, 1990:13-18.
  • 10Ode ,:, Fry G, Tveit M S, Messager P, et al.. Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference[J]. Journal of Environ- mental Management, 2009,90(1):375-383.

二级参考文献21

  • 1SWANWICK C.Landscape character assessment guidance for England and Scotland[R].Edinburgh:The Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage,2002.
  • 2LUO T.Untersuchung zur übertragbarkeit europischer standards der landschaftsbilderfassung und-bewertung in die rumliche planung und umweltvertrglichkeitsprüfung in China-dargestellt am Raum Wuhan (Zentralchina)[D].Rostock:Universitt Rostock,2009.
  • 3ROTH M.Landschaftsanalyse-landschaftsbewertung,entwicklung-sgeschichte eines planungsinstruments[C]//EISEL U,KRNER S.Landschaft in einer kultur der nachhaltigkeit,Band 1.Kassel:Universitt Kassel,2006.
  • 4ROTH M.Stand der anwendung von methoden zur landschaftsbildanalyse und-bewertung (ergebnisse einer auswertung von kommunalen landschaftsplnen aus den jahren 1970 bis 2001)[C]//EISEL U,KRNER S.Landschaft in einer kultur der nachhaltigkeit,Band 1.Kassel:Universitt Kassel,2006.
  • 5BEHM H,LUO T.Landscape planning[M].Rostock,Germany:Universitat Rostock,2006.
  • 6VON HAAREN C.Landschaftsplanung[M].Stuttgart,Germany:Ulmer,2004.
  • 7RIEDEL W,LANGE H.Landschaftsplanung:2.auflage[M].Heidelberg,Germany:Spektrum Verlag,2002.
  • 8CROFTS R S,COOKER R U.Landscape evaluation:a comparison of techniques[R].London:Department of Geography,University College London,1974.
  • 9NOHL W.Landschaftsplanung:sthetische und rekreative aspekte;konzepte,begründungen und verfahrensweisen auf der ebene des landschaftsplans[M].Berlin,Hannover:Patzer Verlag,2001.
  • 10王紫雯.多功能景观概念在可持续景观规划中的运用[J].城市规划,2008,32(2):27-33. 被引量:18

共引文献7

同被引文献176

引证文献14

二级引证文献109

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部