期刊文献+

心理表征和原型实例的结构性审视 被引量:1

Structural Examination on Mental Representation and Prototypical Instances
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Rosch未深入论证原型,Lakoff和Taylor则指出原型理解的误区。为探索范畴化认知机制,在区分心理表征和原型实例的基础上,从范畴化视角审视原型心理表征和具体实例间的结构性关系,试图探索抽象范畴如何对具体实例进行心理表征,认知过程中原型实例的表征机制以及心理表征和具体实例的结构映射。结果发现:心理表征是基本层次范畴基础上范畴成员意象的综合,兼具区别于其它范畴的整体性特征或属性;心理表征和原型实例存在一对多的关系;抽象概念也有上位范畴、基本层次范畴和下属范畴之分;心理表征是对具体实例命题性核心以隐喻和转喻方式进行的映射。 Rosch did not discuss prototype in depth,and Lakoff and Taylor pointed out some misunderstandings about prototype.To further investigate mechanism of categorization,based on distinguishing mental representations and prototypical instances,the research examines the structural relationship between them from the perspective of categorization,and tries to explore how to represent specific instances in abstract categories,representing mechanisms and structural mappings in representing process.It turns out that mental representation is the cognitive combination of images of category members on the basis of basic level categorization with holistic distinctive attributes from other categories;one to many relationship exists between mental representation and prototypical instances;abstract concepts are also categorized into three levels: super-ordinate,basic level and subordinate;and the mental representation is the mapping of propositional conceptual core of prototypical instances through metaphor and metonymy.
作者 王永红
出处 《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2013年第3期233-236,共4页 Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
基金 2012年度中北大学哲学社会科学研究经费资助课题"认知理论在二语习得中的应用模式研究"(2012Y016)
关键词 心理表征 原型实例 结构映射 抽象范畴 表征机制 命题核心 mental representation prototypical instances structural mapping abstract category representational mechanism propositional core
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Langacker. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol.1, Theoretical Prerequisites [M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
  • 2Taylor, J. R. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory (2nd edition) [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
  • 3Lakoff, G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 4赵艳芳.认知语言学概论[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2000..
  • 5王寅.认知语言学[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2006:529-530.
  • 6Ungerer F. & H. Schmid. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics (2nd edition) [M]. BeiJing: Pearson Education Limited, 2006.
  • 7廖巧云,徐盛桓.心智怎样计算隐喻[J].外国语,2012,35(2):46-52. 被引量:44

二级参考文献13

  • 1Davidson, D. Mental events [ J ]. Foster, L. & J. W. Swanson. Experience and Theory [ C ]. Amhert : Uni- versity of Massachusetts Press, 1970.79 - 101.
  • 2Dennett, D. & J. Haugeland. Intentionality [ A ]. G. R. Langton & O. L. Zangwill. The Oxford Com- panion to the Mind[ C]. Oxford: OUP, 1987.
  • 3Jacob, P. What Minds Can Do [ M ]. Cambridge - Cambridge University Press, 1997.77.
  • 4Paivio, Allan. Mental Representations [ M ]. New York : Oxford University Press, 1986.53.
  • 5Searle, J. lntentionality : An Essay in the Philoso- phy of Mind[ M]. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 1983.
  • 6金在权.随附性的种种概念[A].高新民,储昭华.心灵哲学[C].北京:商务印书馆,2002.28.
  • 7蒋哲伦.周邦彦选集[M].开封:河南大学出版社,1999.
  • 8徐盛桓.隐喻为什么可能[J].外语教学,2008,29(3):1-7. 被引量:90
  • 9徐盛桓.外延内涵传承说——转喻机理新论[J].外国语,2009,32(3):2-9. 被引量:82
  • 10陈晓平.“随附性”概念辨析[J].哲学研究,2010(4):71-79. 被引量:40

共引文献498

同被引文献15

  • 1Amodio, D. M. (2008). The social neuroscience of intergroup relations. European Review of Sccial Psycbology, 19, 1-54.
  • 2Barsalou, L. W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory and Cogni6on, 10, 82-93.
  • 3Grafman, J. (1994). Handbook ofneuropsychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • 4Grafman, J. (1995). Similarities and distinctions among current models of prefrontal cortical functions. Ann NY Academlc Science, 769, 337-368.
  • 5Groom, C. J., Sherman, J. W., Lu, L., Conrey, F. R., & Keijzer, B. C. (2005). Judging compound social categories: Compound familiarity and compatibility as determinants of proeessing mode. SoeiM Cognigon, 23, 291-323.
  • 6Hewstone, Z. R. A. M. (2001). Subtyping and subgrouping: Processes for the prevention and promotion of stereotype change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 52-73.
  • 7Laeng, B., Zarrinpar, A., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2003). Do separate processes identify objects as exemplars versusmembers of basic-level categories? Evidence from hemispheric specialization. Brzdn and Cognition, 53, 15-27.
  • 8Leone1, G. M., Santos, A. S. C., & Mackie, D. M. (2006). Stereotypes: Static abstractions or dynamic knowledge structures? Joumzd of PersonMity and Social Psychology, 2006, 91, 814-831.
  • 9Sherman, J. W. (1996). Development and mental representation of stereotypes. Journal of Personah and Social Psychology, 70, 1126-1141.
  • 10White, K. R., Crites, S. L., Taylor, J. H., & Corral, G. (2009). Wait, what? Assessing stereotype incongruities using the N400 ERP component. Scan, 4, 191-198.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部