期刊文献+

Comparative study of perpendicular versus parallel double plating methods for type C distal humeral fractures 被引量:10

Comparative study of perpendicular versus parallel double plating methods for type C distal humeral fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Double plate osteosynthesis is the standard treatment for intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus.However,there is still controversy concerning dual plate positions in terms of providing optimal stability.The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes in patients with type C intra-articular distal humeral fractures using perpendicular and parallel plating methods.Methods Between March 2008 and June 2011,a total of 45 patients with type C distal humerus fractures were treated using two different dual plating methods.Of them,24 patients were treated by perpendicular plating (group Ⅰ) and 21 patients were treated by parallel plating (group Ⅱ).The surgical time,blood loss,and union time were compared between the two groups.The fiexion-extension arc,the total range of flexion and extension at the end of follow-up were compared between the two groups.The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was used to determine the elbow functional results.Results All patients were followed up.The mean duration of follow-up was 16 months (range 12-25 months) in group Ⅰ and 15.5 months in group Ⅱ (range 12-25 months).There were no significant differences in the surgical time,blood loss,and the bone union time between the two groups.In group Ⅰ,the mean elbow flexion-extension arc was 101° and the mean MEPS was 85 points.The rate of excellent and good results was 87.5%.In group Ⅱ,the mean flexion-extension arc was 100° and the mean MEPS was 86.1 points.The rate of excellent and good results was 90.5%.There were no significant differences in the MEPS,flexion-extension arc,and the total range of flexion and extension between the two groups.Conclusions Perpendicular and parallel plate configurations with the appropriate surgical techniques can provide anatomical reconstruction and stable fixation of type C intra-articular distal humeral fractures and allow early mobilization of the elbow after an operation.The occurrence of post-operative elbow stiffness can be reduced and good outcomes can be obtained. Background Double plate osteosynthesis is the standard treatment for intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus.However,there is still controversy concerning dual plate positions in terms of providing optimal stability.The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes in patients with type C intra-articular distal humeral fractures using perpendicular and parallel plating methods.Methods Between March 2008 and June 2011,a total of 45 patients with type C distal humerus fractures were treated using two different dual plating methods.Of them,24 patients were treated by perpendicular plating (group Ⅰ) and 21 patients were treated by parallel plating (group Ⅱ).The surgical time,blood loss,and union time were compared between the two groups.The fiexion-extension arc,the total range of flexion and extension at the end of follow-up were compared between the two groups.The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was used to determine the elbow functional results.Results All patients were followed up.The mean duration of follow-up was 16 months (range 12-25 months) in group Ⅰ and 15.5 months in group Ⅱ (range 12-25 months).There were no significant differences in the surgical time,blood loss,and the bone union time between the two groups.In group Ⅰ,the mean elbow flexion-extension arc was 101° and the mean MEPS was 85 points.The rate of excellent and good results was 87.5%.In group Ⅱ,the mean flexion-extension arc was 100° and the mean MEPS was 86.1 points.The rate of excellent and good results was 90.5%.There were no significant differences in the MEPS,flexion-extension arc,and the total range of flexion and extension between the two groups.Conclusions Perpendicular and parallel plate configurations with the appropriate surgical techniques can provide anatomical reconstruction and stable fixation of type C intra-articular distal humeral fractures and allow early mobilization of the elbow after an operation.The occurrence of post-operative elbow stiffness can be reduced and good outcomes can be obtained.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2013年第12期2337-2342,共6页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 distal humerus elbow joint fractures comminuted bone plates range of motion articular distal humerus elbow joint fractures, comminuted bone plates range of motion, articular
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Komer J, Lill H, Muller LP, Rommens PM, Schneider E, Linke B. The LCP-concept in the operative treatment of distal humerus fractures-biological, biomechanical and surgical aspects. Injury 2003; 34: B20-B30.
  • 2Komer J, Lill H, Muller LP, Hessmann M, Kopf K, Goldhahn J, et al. Distal humerus fractures in elderly patients:results after open reduction and internal fixation. Osteoporos Int 2005;16: S73-S79.
  • 3Liu 11, Ruan HJ, Wang JG, Fan CY, Zeng BF. Double-column fixation for type C fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18: 646-651.
  • 4McKee MD, Jupiter JB. Fractures of the distal humerus. In: Browner B, Jupiter J, Levine A, Trafton P, eds. Skeletal trauma. Third ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2002: 765-782.
  • 5O'Driscoll Sw. Optimizing stability in distal humeral fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elbow 2005; 14: 186S-194S.
  • 6Stoffel K, Cunneen S, Morgan R, Nicholls R, Stachowiak G. Comparative stability of perpendicular versus parallel double-locking plating systems in osteoporotic comminuted distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Res 2008; 26: 778-784.
  • 7Self J, Viegas SF Jr, Buford WL, Patterson RM. A comparison of double-plate fixation methods for complex distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1995; 4: 10-16.
  • 8Jacobson SR, Glisson RR, Urbanaik JR. Comparison of distal humerus fracture fixation: a biomechanical study. J Southern OrthopAssoc 1997; 6: 241-249.
  • 9Koonce RC, Baldini TH, Morgan SJ. Are conventional reconstruction plates equivalent to precontoured locking plates for distal humerus fracture fixation? A biomechanics cadaver study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2012; 27: 697-701.
  • 10McKee MD, Wilson TL, Winston L, Schemitsch EH, Richards RR. Functional outcome following surgical treatment of intra-articular distal humeral fractures through a posterior approach. J Bone Joint SurgAm 2000; 82-A: 1701-1707.

同被引文献75

引证文献10

二级引证文献112

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部