期刊文献+

Early posterior spinal canal decompression and circumferential reconstruction of rotationally unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures with neurological deficit 被引量:7

Early posterior spinal canal decompression and circumferential reconstruction of rotationally unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures with neurological deficit
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Among the various treatments of neurologically involved unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures,the combination of anterior and posterior instrumentation provides the most stable reconstruction.However,the use of both approaches on a trauma patient may increase the morbidity.This study is a retrospective matched cohort study to evaluate the advantages of a single stage posterior approach for spinal canal decompression in combination with circumferential reconstruction by comparing the clinical and radiographic results.Methods From March 2005 to September 2009,patients with matched type spinal fracture,ages at surgery,and involved levels in our institute underwent either a single stage posterior approach (group one,n=12) or traditional combined approach (group two,n=14) for spinal canal decompression and circumferential reconstruction were reviewed.Pre-and post-operative X-ray films were reviewed and changes in Cobb angle of thoracolumbar spine were documented.Intra-operative,post-operative,and general complications were registered.Results The mean follow-up was (27.7±9.6) months (range,14 to 56 months) in group one and (29.2±7.4) months (range,20 to 60 months) in group two (P 〉0.05).The mean operation time was 214 minutes (range,186-327 minutes) in group one and 284 minutes (range,219-423 minutes) in group two (P 〈0.05).The average volume of intraoperative blood loss was 1856 ml (range,1250-3480 ml) in group one and 2453 ml (range,1600-3680 ml) in group two (P 〈0.05).There was no statistical difference between the groups one and two in average vertebral body height loss at the injured level and the average Cobb angle in sagittal plane before and immediately after surgery.Postoperatively,there was an epidural hematoma in one patient in group one and two patients in group two.Bony union after stabilization was obtained in all patients,without loosening or breakage of screws.Loss of correction (5°) was seen in 1 patient in group one at the 6th month owing to the subsidence of the Titanium mesh cages into the vertebra.In group two,totally four patients suffered respiratory-related complication,including pneumonia in two,severe atelectasis in one and pleural effusions in one.Importantly,there were no intraoperative or postoperative deaths in any group.All patients with incomplete neurologic deficits improved at least 1 Frankel grade.Conclusion Single-stage posterior vertebra resection in combination with circumferential reconstruction is a new option to manage severe thoracolumbar burst fractures. Background Among the various treatments of neurologically involved unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures,the combination of anterior and posterior instrumentation provides the most stable reconstruction.However,the use of both approaches on a trauma patient may increase the morbidity.This study is a retrospective matched cohort study to evaluate the advantages of a single stage posterior approach for spinal canal decompression in combination with circumferential reconstruction by comparing the clinical and radiographic results.Methods From March 2005 to September 2009,patients with matched type spinal fracture,ages at surgery,and involved levels in our institute underwent either a single stage posterior approach (group one,n=12) or traditional combined approach (group two,n=14) for spinal canal decompression and circumferential reconstruction were reviewed.Pre-and post-operative X-ray films were reviewed and changes in Cobb angle of thoracolumbar spine were documented.Intra-operative,post-operative,and general complications were registered.Results The mean follow-up was (27.7±9.6) months (range,14 to 56 months) in group one and (29.2±7.4) months (range,20 to 60 months) in group two (P 〉0.05).The mean operation time was 214 minutes (range,186-327 minutes) in group one and 284 minutes (range,219-423 minutes) in group two (P 〈0.05).The average volume of intraoperative blood loss was 1856 ml (range,1250-3480 ml) in group one and 2453 ml (range,1600-3680 ml) in group two (P 〈0.05).There was no statistical difference between the groups one and two in average vertebral body height loss at the injured level and the average Cobb angle in sagittal plane before and immediately after surgery.Postoperatively,there was an epidural hematoma in one patient in group one and two patients in group two.Bony union after stabilization was obtained in all patients,without loosening or breakage of screws.Loss of correction (5°) was seen in 1 patient in group one at the 6th month owing to the subsidence of the Titanium mesh cages into the vertebra.In group two,totally four patients suffered respiratory-related complication,including pneumonia in two,severe atelectasis in one and pleural effusions in one.Importantly,there were no intraoperative or postoperative deaths in any group.All patients with incomplete neurologic deficits improved at least 1 Frankel grade.Conclusion Single-stage posterior vertebra resection in combination with circumferential reconstruction is a new option to manage severe thoracolumbar burst fractures.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2013年第12期2343-2347,共5页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 posterior approach burst fractures thoracolumbar vertebra KYPHOSIS OSTEOTOMY posterior approach burst fractures thoracolumbar vertebra kyphosis osteotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1WANG Yi-sheng YIN Li BAO Heng WANG Wei-dong.Titanium mesh fusion device in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2007(3):246-247. 被引量:3
  • 2[1]Sasso RC,Best NM,Reilly TM,et al.Anterior-only stabilization of three-column thoracolumbar injuries.J Spinal Disord,2005,18:S7-14
  • 3[2]Vaccaro AR,Zeiller SC,Hulbert RJ,et al.The thoracolumbar injury severity score:A proposed treatment algorithm.J Spinal Disord Tech,2005,18:209-215
  • 4[3]Mirza SK,Mirza AJ,Chapman JR,et al.Classifications of thoracic and lumbar fractures:Rationale and supporting data.J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2002,10:364 -377
  • 5[4]Vaccaro AR,Lim MR,Hurlbert RJ,et al.Surgical decision making for unstable thoracolumbar spine injuries:Results of a consensus panel review by the spine trauma study group.J Spinal Disord,2006,19:1 10
  • 6[5]Dai LY,Jin WJ.Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the load sharing classification of the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.Spine,2005,30:354 358
  • 7[6]Haba H,Taneichi H,Kotani Y,et al.Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting posterior ligamentous complex injury associated with thoracic and lumbar fractures.J Neurosurg,2003,99:20-26
  • 8[7]McLain RF,Sparling E,Benson DR.Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures.J Bone Joint Surg Am,1993,75:162-167
  • 9[8]McCormack T,Karaikovic E,Gaines RW.The load sharing classification of spine fractures.Spine,1994,19:1741-1744
  • 10[9]Shono Y,McAfee PC,Cunningham BW.Experimental study of thoracolumbar burst fractures.A radiographic and biomechanical analysis of anterior and posterior instrumentation systems.Spine,1994,19:1711 1722

共引文献17

同被引文献52

引证文献7

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部