期刊文献+

国际环境公约稳定性的重复博弈分析 被引量:2

An Analysis of the Stability of International Environmental Agreements Based on Repeated Games
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际环境公约的有效性包括减排有效性与社会福利有效性两个方面,强调一个有效的国际环境公约在减排的前提下提高社会福利的功能。然而,基于Carraro&Siniscalco 1993和Hoel 1992的同时博弈模型,本文发现全合作是有效的却是不稳定的。将他们的模型拓展为无限期的重复博弈后,发现基于远期收益考虑的情况之下,一个全合作的国际环境公约是可以被子博弈完美均衡所支持的。另外,在证明中,本文也给出了折现因子的下界。 In this paper, the efficiency of International Environmental Agreements(IEAs) is defined in terms of emission reducing and maximizing joint social welfare. It emphasizes lEAs' improvement on the social welfare without increasing the pollution, For the simultaneous model in Carraro & Sinisealco(1993) and Hoel ( 1992), we show that the outcome of full cooperation is efficient but not stable. When the benchmark model is extended to infinitely repeated game, we show that full cooperation lower hound of the discount factor is also provided. is supported by subgame perfect equilibrium. And, the
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期16-20,共5页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71001002 71133001 71073019) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(YWF-10-02-103)
关键词 环境经济学 国际环境公约 重复博弈 有效性 稳定性 environmental economics international environmental agreements repeated game efficiency stability
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1D' Aspremont G A, Jacquemin J G, Gadszeweiz J, Weymark J A. On the stability of collusive price leadership[ J]. Canadian Journal of Economics, 1983, 16( 1 ) : 17-25.
  • 2Hoel M. Global Environmental problems: tile effects of unilateral actions taken by one country[ J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1991, 20( 1 ) : 55-70.
  • 3Barrett S. Self-enforcing international environmental agreements[ J]. Oxford Economic Papers, 1994, 46 (Supplement 1 ) : 878- 894.
  • 4Carraro C, Siniscalco D. Strategies for the international protection of the environment[ J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1993, 52(3) : 309-328.
  • 5Hoel M. International environmental conventions: tile case of uniform reductions of emission[ J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1992, 2(2) : 141-159.
  • 6Finus M, Rundsbagen B. Endogenous coalition formation in global pollution control: a partition function approach, in: Carraro C. (ed.), Endogenous Formation of Economic Coalitions[ M]. 2003, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
  • 7Rubio S J, Casino B. A note on cooperative versus non-cooperative strategies in international pollutant control[ J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2002, 24(3): 251-261.
  • 8Rubio S J, Casino B. Self-enforcing international environmental agreements with a stock pollutant [ J]. Spanish Economic Review, 2005, 7(2) : 89-109.
  • 9Osmani D, Tol R. Toward farsightedly stable international rnvironmental agreements[ J]. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 2009, 11(3) : 455-492.
  • 10Biancardi M, Villani G. Largest consistent set in international environmental agreements [ J]. Computational Economics, 2011, 38(3) : 407-423.

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部