期刊文献+

磺达肝葵钠与那曲肝素在非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的安全性和疗效比较 被引量:6

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的在ACC/AHA/ESC指南中,磺达肝葵钠在接受经皮冠状动脉介入术或保守治疗的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者中作为I类推荐;在中国,那曲肝素是一种普通的抗凝药物。比较磺达肝葵钠与那曲肝素的安全性和疗效。方法选取2010年10月26至2011年5月25日在河北省邯郸市中心医院心内三科住院的74名非sT段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者,随机分为两组,每组37例,分别给予平均4d的磺达肝葵钠(2.5mg,每天1次)和那曲肝素(0.1ml/kg,每天2次)。主要安全终点是9d时主要和次要出血,主要有效终点包括9d时全因死亡、急性心肌梗死和再缺血事件。所有患者随访180d。结果9、30d时两组间主要出血事件差异无统计学意义[危害比(95%C/)均为0.96(0.32~3.47),P均为0.85],在次要出血事件,磺达肝葵钠组比那曲肝素组减少,但差异无统计学意义[危害比(95%CI)0.64(0.18—2.28),0.57(0.17—1.95),P值分别为0.49,0.37];9、30d时磺达肝葵钠组与那曲肝素组均无全因死亡,心肌梗死事件在两组之间差异无统计学意义[危害比(95%CI)均为0.64(0.18~2.28),P值均为0.49],缺血事件在两组之间差异无统计学意义[危害比(95%c/)0.69(0.35~1.96),0.79(0.31—2.02),P值分别为0.41,0.43]。结论对非sT段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者,与那曲肝素相比,磺达肝葵钠不能显著减少出血和缺血事件。
出处 《中国综合临床》 2013年第8期806-808,共3页 Clinical Medicine of China
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1黄红梅,李俐.替罗非班治疗老年非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征的临床研究[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2011,3(1):41-43. 被引量:18
  • 2Task Force for Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-SegmentElevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of European Society ofCardiology, Bassand JP, Hamm CW, et al. Guidelines for thediagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronarysyndromes [ J]. Eur Heart J,2007,28( 13) : 1598-1660.
  • 3Murphy SA,Gibson CM,Morrow DA,et al. Efficacy and safety ofthe low-molecular weight heparin enoxaparin compared withunfractionated heparin across the acute coronary syndromespectrum: a meta-analysis [ J]. Eur Heart J,2007,28( 17) :2077-2086.
  • 4Vande Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, et al. Management of acutemyocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation : the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the EuropeanSociety of Cardiology [J]. Eur Heart J,2008,29(23) :2909-2945.
  • 5Samama MM,Gerotziafas GT. Evaluation of the pharmacologicalproperties and clinical results of the synthetic pentasaccharide(fondaparinux) [ J]. Thromb Res,2003 ,109( 1) :1-11.
  • 6FifthOrganization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic SyndromesInvestigators,Yusuf S, Mehta SR,et al. Comparison of fondaparinuxand enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes [J]. N Engl J Med,2006,354(14) :1464-1476.
  • 7Hirsh J,Guyatt G,Albers GW,et al. Executive summary:American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based ClinicalPractice Guidelines ( 8th Edition ) [J]. Chest, 2008, 133 (6Suppl) :71S-109S.
  • 8Ferguson JJ, Califf RM, Antman EM, et al. Enoxaparin vsunfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segmentelevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an intended earlyinvasive strategy : primary results of the SYNERGY randomizedtrial [J]. JAMA,2004,292(1) :45-54.
  • 9Anderson JA, Hirsh J, Yusuf S, et al. Comparison of theanticoagulant intensities of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in theOrganization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes(OASIS)-5 tria[J]. J Thromb Haemost,2010,8:243-249.
  • 10Ostadal P,Alan D,Vejvoda J,et al. Anti-Xa activity of enoxaparinand nadroparin in patients with acute coronary syndrome [ J]. ExpClin Cardiol,2008,13:175-178.

二级参考文献4

共引文献17

同被引文献62

  • 1杨士伟,周玉杰.2011年美国不稳定型心绞痛和非ST段抬高心肌梗死治疗指南——解读与实践[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2011,3(5):100-107. 被引量:36
  • 2常桂英.磺达肝癸钠治疗急性冠脉综合征的临床观察[J].中外医学研究,2013,11(20):22-23. 被引量:7
  • 3霍勇,刘兆平.冠心病介入治疗围手术期抗血小板与抗凝药物的应用[J].中国实用内科杂志,2006,26(8):1139-1141. 被引量:4
  • 4Pepe C, Machado M, Olimpio A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of fondaparinux in patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation. Arq Bras Cardiol, 2012,99 : 613-622.
  • 5Task Force for Diagnosisand Treatment of Non-ST-Segment nent Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of European Society of Can- liology, Bassand JP, Hamm CW, et al. Guidelines for the diag- nosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J, 2007,28 : 1598-1660.
  • 6张莹,陈功,王丽萍,等.磺达肝葵钠治疗不稳定型心绞痛的临床观察.医药与保健,2015,2:71-71.
  • 7Jolly SS, Boden WE, Budaj A, et al. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with glycoprotein II b/lH a inhibitors or thienopyridines: results from the OASIS 5 (Fifth Organization to Assess Strategies in Ischemic Syndromes) trial. Am Coll Cardiol, 2009,54 : 468-476.
  • 8Shah S, Khajuria V, Tandon VR, et al. Comparative evaluation of efficacy, safety and haemostatic parameters of enoxaparin and fondaparinux in unstable coronary artery disease. Clin Diagn Res,2014,8 : 31-34.
  • 9Simoons ML, Gardien M, Ruzyllo W, et al. A dose-find!ng study of fondaparinux in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the Pentasaccharide in Unstable Angina (PENTUA) Study. Am Coll Cardiol, 2004,43:2183 - 2190.
  • 10Aggarwal B, Menon V. Recent advances in treatment of acute coronary syndromes [EB/OL]. F1000Prime Rep.2013,5:56.Publishedonline,2013:10.12703/P5-56.

引证文献6

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部