期刊文献+

超声判断急性阑尾炎病理类型的价值 被引量:6

Ultrasonic diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the value of pathological types
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较急性阑尾炎不同病理类型的声像图特点,为超声判断急性阑尾炎病理类型提供指导。方法回顾性分析79例手术病理证实为急性阑尾炎患者的超声图像资料,根据不同病理类型,分别总结不同病理类型超声图像特点,比较不同病理类型各超声征像出现率的差异。结果指状低回声肿块、阑尾管腔扩张积液、管腔内强回声伴声影、不规则低回声肿块征像在不同病理类型出现率差异不明显,"靶环征"在单纯性和化脓性阑尾炎之间出现率差异不明显(P>0.05),但均高与坏疽性,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);"阑尾周围积液"征像在化脓性和坏疽性阑尾炎之间出现率差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05),但均高于单纯性(P<0.05)。结论不同病理类型急性阑尾炎具有一定的特征性超声征像,可为超声检查初步判断急性阑尾炎病理类型提供依据。 Objective To compare the ultrasonographic features of acute appendicitis in different pathological types in order to guide the ultrasonic diagnosis of pathological types of acute appendicitis. Methods A retrospective analysis of ultrasonographic data of 79 patients with acute appendicitis which was proved by pathological diagnosis was performed. According to the different pathological types,we sum- marized ultrasound image characteristics of different pathological types, and compared differences of uhrasonography within different path- ological types. Results Significantly distended of the appendix with effusion,higher echo with shadow in the appedndix lumen,irregular lower echo mass were not obviously different in the different pathological types. Incidence rate of "target like sign" was not significantly different between the simple and phlegmonous appendicitis( P 〉 0.05 ), but were higher than that in acute gangrenous appendicitis, the difference was statistically significant(P 〈 0.05 ) ;Incidence rate of "effusion around the appendix" was not statistically different(P 〉 0. 05) between acute phlegmonous and gangrenous appendicitis, but higher than that of the simple type ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion The dif- ferent pathological types of acute appendicitis with ultrasound features of certain signs may be useful in preliminary judgment of pathologi- cal types of acute appendicitis.
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2013年第6期1001-1002,共2页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 急性阑尾炎 病理类型 超声检查 acute appendicitis pathological type ultrasonography
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献39

  • 1赵佳.误诊为急性阑尾炎26例临床分析[J].实用医技杂志,2008,15(29):4125-4126. 被引量:3
  • 2孙健.急性阑尾炎声像图表现分析[J].中国超声医学杂志,1994,10(6):36-37. 被引量:31
  • 3Jeffrey RB, ain KA, Nghiem HV Sonograhic difference of acute appendicitis interpretive pitfalls. A JR, 1994,162 (1) : 55-58.
  • 4Puylaevt JBCM. Acute appendicitis Us tvaluatiou using graded compression . AJR,1967,96(11):79-81.
  • 5[1]Abu-Youse MM, Bleicher JJ, Maher JW, et al. High-resolution sonography of acute appendicitis[J]. AJR,1987,149(1):43-58.
  • 6[2]Jeffrey RB, Laing FC, Lewis FR. Acute appendicitis:High-resolution real-time US findings[J]. Radiology,1987,163(1):11-14.
  • 7[3]Jeffrey RB, Laing FC, Townsend RR. Acute appendicitis: sonographic criteria based on 250 cases[J]. Radiology,1988,167(2):327-329.
  • 8[4]Puylaer JBCM, Rutgeros PH, LalisangRI, et al. A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis[J]. N Engl J Med,1987,317(11):666-669.
  • 9[5]Paylaert JBCM. Acute appendicitis:US evaluation using graded compression[J]. Radiology,1986,158(2):355-360.
  • 10[6]Rioux M. Sonographic detection of the normal and abnormal appendix[J]. Am J Roentgenol,1992,158(4):773-776.

共引文献196

同被引文献56

  • 1周永昌,郭万学.超声医学[M].4版.北京:科学技术文献出版社,2004:466
  • 2Deakin DE, Ahmel I. Interval appendicectomy after resolution of a- dult inflammatory appendix mass -is it necessary ? [ J ]. Surgeon, 2007,5(1) :45 -50.
  • 3Jo YH,Kim K,Rhee JE,et al.The accuracy of emergency medicine and surgical residents in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis[J].Am J Emerg Med,2010,28(7):766-770.
  • 4Sim JY,Kim HJ,Yeon JW,et al.Added value of ultrasound re-evaluation for patients with equivocal CT fingdings of acute appendicitis:apreliminary study[J].Eur Radiol,2013,23(7):1882-1890.
  • 5van Randen A,Lameris W,van Es HW,et al.Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probalility of appendicitis[J].Eur Radiol,2010,20(7):1657-1666.
  • 6Lee WS,Choi ST,Lee JN,et al.Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy:a prospective randomized controlled study[J].Ann Surg,2013,257(2):214-218.
  • 7Ohtani H,Tamamori Y,Arimoto Y,et al.Meta analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2012,16(10):1929-1939.
  • 8Long KH,Bannon MP,Zietlow SP,et al.A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy:clinical and economic analyses[J].J Surg,2011,129(4):390-400.
  • 9Styrud J,Eriksson S,Nilsson I,et al.Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis.a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial[J].World J Surg,2006,30(6):1033-1037.
  • 10任培土,沈志宏.腹腔镜阑尾切除术的适应证探讨[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2010,15(2):146-148. 被引量:47

引证文献6

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部