期刊文献+

手术治疗股骨转子间骨折316例的疗效分析 被引量:3

Analysis of operation methods for 316 cases of intertrochanteric bone fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较动力髋螺钉(DHS)、股骨近端解剖型锁定板、股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)、人工关节置换术治疗股骨转子间骨折的疗效。方法将1997年8月~2012年6月收治的316例患者按照治疗方法分为DHS组(129例)、锁定钢板组(134例)、PFNA组(48例)和关节置换组(5例)。对患者的资料进行同顾性分析。比较前3组患者术前情况、术后负重时间、骨折愈合时间、患髋功能及并发症等。结果患者术后获得7~22个月随访,平均12个月。DHS组、锁定钢板组、PFNA组骨折愈合时间,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Harris评分结果:关节置换组评分最高,为(91.7±13.1)分,与其他3组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PFNA组在切口长度、术中出血量优于其他组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于稳定性骨折,内固定选择多样。对于不稳定骨折或严重骨质疏松骨折且不能耐受关节置换术者,髓内固定为首选。对于高龄不稳定骨折、严重骨质疏松、术前可行走、能耐受手术的患者,人工双极股骨头置换可作为一种有效的补充手段。 Objective To compare the effect of healing intertrochanteric bone fracture by dynamic hip screw (DHS), anatomic proximal femoral locking plate,proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and artificial joint replacement. Methods 316 cases of patients,who were treated from August 1997 to June 2012,they were divided into DHS group (129 cases),locking plate group (134 cases),PFNA group (48 cases) and artificial joint replacement group (5 cases) ac- cording to the treatment methods.Retrospective analysis was carried out.Pre-operation conditions,post-operation weight-bearing time,symphysis time,hip function and complications were compared. Results Patients were followed up 7 to 22 months (average 12 months).There were no statistic differentiation in healing time among the DHS group,lock- ing plate group,PFNA group (P 〉 0.05).Artificial joint replacement group got the highest Harris score (91.7_+13.1), and there were significant statistic differentiations comparing to other three groups (P 〈 0.05).PFNA group had better length of incision and inoperative bleeding than other groups,and there were significant statistic differentiations (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion There are a lot of intra-fixation selections for stable fracture.Intramedullary fixation would be the best choice for unstable fracture or severe osteoporotic fracture with intolerant artificial joint replacement.Artificial bipolar joint replacement would be an effective supplementary method for advance age patients with unstable fracture,severe osteoporotic fracture and who can walk pre-operation and tolerate operation.
出处 《中国当代医药》 2013年第20期11-13,16,共4页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 股骨转子间骨折 动力髋螺钉 股骨近端解剖型锁定板 股骨近端防旋髓内钉 人工关节置换术 Intertrochanteric bone fracture Dynamic hip screw Anatomic proximal femoral locking plate Proximalfemoral nail anti-rotation Artificial joint replacement
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1王海洲,林强,陈海云,陈平,谢贻达,许树柴,罗翱翔.InterTan髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的疗效分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2012,14(8):729-731. 被引量:4
  • 2Harris WH.Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabularfractures ; treatment by mold arthroplasty.An end-result study using anew method of result evaluation[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1969,51.4):737-755.
  • 3Cummings SR, Melwn U.Epidemiology and outcomes of osteopototicfractmes[J].Lancet,2002,359(9319) : 1761-1767.
  • 4王满宜.加强股骨近端骨折的临床研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(5):481-483. 被引量:123
  • 5Audige L, Hanson B,Swiontkowski MF.Implant-related complicationsin the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures; meta-analysisof dynamic screw -plate versus dynamic screw -intramedullary naildevices[J].Int Orthop ,2003,27(4) : 197-203.
  • 6Haidukewych GJ, Israel TA,Berry DJ.Reverse obliquity fractures ofthe intertrochanteric region of the femur[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am ,2001,83(5):643-650.
  • 7O'Neill F.Dynamic hip screw versus DHS blade : a biomechanicalcomparison of the fixation achieved by each implant in bone[J].J BoneJoint Surg Br,2011,93(5) :616-621.
  • 8Konstantinidis L,Papaioannou C,Mehlhom A,et al.Salvage proceduresfor trochanteric femoral fractures after internal fixation failure:biomechanical comparison of a plate fixator and the dynamic condylarscrew[J].Proc Inst Mech Eng H ,2011,225(6) :710-717.
  • 9李其庆,谢斌,杨卫国.锁定钢板治疗股骨转子间骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2010,13(1):100-100. 被引量:10
  • 10Menezes DF,Gamulin A,Noesberger B.Is the proximal femoral nail asuitable implant for treatment of all trochanteric fracture [J].ClinOrthop Relat Res,2005,439:221-227.

二级参考文献10

  • 1王满宜,危杰.股骨颈骨折临床研究的若干问题与新概念[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2003,5(1):5-9. 被引量:290
  • 2黄公怡 王福权 等.鹅头钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的疗效分析[J].中华骨科杂志,1984,4(2):349-349.
  • 3Jensen JS. Classification of trochanteric fractures. Acta Orthop Scand, 1980, 51: 803-810.
  • 4Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and ac- etabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-resuh study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1969, 51: 757-755.
  • 5Parker M J, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylic in- tramedullary nails versus extramedulla T implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010(9): CD000093.
  • 6Saudan M, Ltibbeke A, Sadowski C, et al. Pertrochanteric fractures: is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail: a randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail. J Orthop Trauma, 2002, 16: 386-393.
  • 7Ruecker AH, Rupprecht M, Gruber M, et al. The treatment of in- tertrochanteric fractures: results using an intramedullary nail with in- tegrated cephalocervical screws and linear compression. J Orthop Tramna, 2009, 23: 22-30.
  • 8张世民.股骨粗隆间骨折中外侧壁的概念及其临床意义[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2010,18(17):1489-1492. 被引量:59
  • 9秦晖,安智全.InterTan治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效评估[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2010,24(12):1424-1427. 被引量:50
  • 10王满宜,张力丹.中华医学会骨科分会创伤骨科学组2002年学术交流会大会纪要[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2002,4(3):238-239. 被引量:6

共引文献134

同被引文献62

  • 1朱永亮.锁定钢板与股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗股骨近端骨折的疗效比较研究[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(2):36-37. 被引量:1
  • 2夏平光,蔡贤华,王庆,黄卫兵,丁然,李津.股骨近端锁定钢板与股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗AO A3型老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(8):2276-2277. 被引量:22
  • 3Iori T,Kazu M,Akira O,et al. Treatment of troehanteric fractures with the PFNA(proximal femoral nail antirota- tion) nail system-report of early results[J]. Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 2008,66 (4) : 276-279.
  • 4杜兴国,周新立,张成泉.股骨近端解剖型锁定钢板内固定治疗股骨转子间粉碎性骨折[J].健康大视野,2013,21(9):487-488.
  • 5Valentina D, Luca C, Susanna S, et al. Reuse of explanted osteosynthesis devices: a reliable and inexpensive repro- cessing protocol[J]. Injury,2011,42(10) : 1101-1106.
  • 6Pinheiro MM, Reisneto ET, Machado FS, et al. Develop- ment and validation of a tool for identifying women with low bone mineral density and low-impact fractures: the Paulo Osteoporosis Risk Index(SAPORI)[J]. Hum Gen et,2012,23(4) :1371-1379.
  • 7李理,杨渝勇,曹兴,等.应用股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的回顾性队列研究[J].中国医师进修杂志,2014,37(z1):127-128.
  • 8阳春华.股骨近端锁定钢板与PFNA治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效分析[J].中外健康文摘,2014,6(23):175-176.
  • 9冯小兵,屈建华,谭捷,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉与股骨近端解剖型锁定钢板治疗老年人股骨转子间骨折的对比研究[J].中国保健营养(上旬刊),2014,24(7):3728-3729.
  • 10樊继华.三种方法治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的前瞻对照研究[J].医药前沿,2014,(20):275-276.

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部