期刊文献+

甘蔗品种(系)宿根性表现与甘蔗成本价格比较 被引量:1

Comparison between Cost Price of 10 Sugarcane Varieties (lines) and Ratoon Character
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2011年10个甘蔗宿根栽培试验结果表明:桂糖02-496宿根蔗茎产量最高,达108790 kg/hm2,比新台糖22号和新台糖16号增产17.4%和24.8%,增产极显著。但11月和12月份蔗糖分较低,平均蔗糖分11.97%,比新台糖22号和新台糖16号减1.61和1.46个百分点。原料蔗成本价格最低为358.63元/t,分别比新台糖22号(CK1)和新台糖16号(CK2)减少36.38元/t和51.77元/t,减少9.21%和12.61%。比两对照高产的还有桂辐98-296、桂糖04-2278、桂糖04-120、柳城03-362,但11月和12月份蔗糖分较低。桂糖02-796、玉林1号、桂糖04-153、桂糖04-2724、桂糖04-112的宿根蔗茎产量及蔗糖分表现均不突出。 Result of the ratoon cultivation test in 2011 showed that: GT 02-496 ratoon cane yield was increased by 17.4% and 24.8% up to 108795 kg/ha, than that of ROC 22 (CK1) and ROC 16 (CK2), but a lower average sucrose content in November and December was at 11.97%, than that of ROC 22 and ROC 16 in 1.61 and 1.46 percent points. The lowest price of Raw material sugarcane was 358.63 yuan/t, reduced by 9.21% and 12.61%, 36.38 yuan and 51.77 yuan/t decrease compared to ROC 22 and ROC 16. GF98-296, GT 04-2278, GT 04-120, Liucheng 03-362 were with high yield than the two controls. However, GT 02-796, Yulin-1, GT 04-153, GT 04-2724 and GT 04-112 of ratoon cane yield and sugar content were not prominent.
作者 唐宗明
出处 《中国糖料》 2013年第3期27-29,共3页 Sugar Crops of China
关键词 甘蔗品种(系) 宿根性表现 成本价格 sugarcane varieties (lines) character of sugarcane ratoon cost price
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献6

共引文献74

同被引文献26

  • 1Chittaranjan K, Robert J H. Genentics Genomics and Breeding of Sugarcane [M]. New Hampshire, USA, Science Publishers. 2010.
  • 2国家统计局.中国农业统计年鉴(2012)[EB/OL].http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2012/indexch.htm,2015-07-20.
  • 3Garside A L, Bell M J. Row spacing and planting density effects on the growth and yield of sugarcane. 1. Responses in fumigated and non-fumigated soil [ J]. Crop & Pasture Science, 2009, 60 (6) : 532-543.
  • 4Devi T C, Lakshmi M B, Naidu N V. Response of new sugarcane genotypes to wide row spacing [J]. Sugar Tech., 2005, 7 (4) : 154-156.
  • 5Kleemann S G L, Gill G S. Influence of row spacing on water use and yield of rain-fed wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ) in a no-till system with stubble retention [J]. Crop & Pasture Science, 2010, 61 (11) : 892-898.
  • 6Singels A, Smit M A. The effect of row spacing on an irrigated plant crop of sugarcane variety NC0376 [A].Proceeding of South Africa Sugarcane Technology Association [C]. 2002: 94-105.
  • 7杨本鹏,张树珍,蔡文伟,张洪溢,龚康达,王永壮,冯翠莲,王俊刚,杨学.甘蔗健康种苗田间栽培主要农艺性状比较[J].热带作物学报,2010,31(2):171-175. 被引量:39
  • 8谭裕模,江泽普,刘斌,黎焕光,廖青,刘永贤,陈桂芬,何永群,韦广泼,黄玉溢.间种对不同基因型甘蔗生长产量影响与经济效益分析[J].热带作物学报,2010,31(11):1895-1901. 被引量:11
  • 9李志贤,王建武,杨文亭,舒迎花,杜清,刘丽玲,舒磊.甘蔗/大豆间作减量施氮对甘蔗产量、品质及经济效益的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(3):713-719. 被引量:40
  • 10赵自东,贾应明,李言春,白志刚,段兆祜.甘蔗与不同大豆品种间套种试验总结[J].甘蔗糖业,2012,41(3):16-18. 被引量:5

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部