期刊文献+

我国外部信用评级付费模式分析 被引量:3

An Analysis of Charging Models for External Credit Rating in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 次贷危机后信用评级机构的公正性受到质疑,其评级收费模式即发行人付费模式本身的内在缺陷,容易导致利益冲突和评级采购等问题,严重影响了评级结果的客观性和公正性。比较信用评级的付费模式,分析我国信用评级的现状及现行付费模式存在的问题,认为发行人付费模式仍然是目前我国信用评级最可行的模式,但从长远发展来看,收费模式会随着外部市场环境的变化及评级机构自身的发展而不断演进。 The fairness of credit rating agencies has been questioned since the sub - prime mortgage crisis. The in- trinsic defects of their rating charging model, i.e. the issuer paying model, easily lead to interest conflicts and rat- ing purchases and other problems, which has seriously affected the objectivity and fairness of rating results. By com- paring the credit rating charging models and analyzing the current situation and existing problems of charging mod- els, the paper holds that the issuer paying model is still the most viable one ; but from the long - term development, charging models will evolve with the external changes in market conditions and the with development of rating agen- cies.
作者 刘锴
出处 《征信》 北大核心 2013年第7期48-52,共5页 Credit Reference
关键词 信用评级 付费模式 评级监管 credit rating charging model regulation over rating
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献21

  • 1应娟,张益新.信用评级机构收费模式探讨[J].上海金融,2006(6):73-75. 被引量:27
  • 2王磊燕.美证监会剑指信用评级制度改革势在必行[N].第一财经日报,2009-04-17.
  • 3程合红.信用评级是发展公司债券市场的重要民事法律保障机制[N].上海证券报,2007-03.
  • 4Securities and Exchange Commission, Summary report of issues identified in the commission staff's examinations of select credit rating agencies, 2008.
  • 5John Patrick Hunt, Credit Rating Agencies and the "Worldwide Credit Crisis" : the Limits of Reputation, the Insufficiency of Reform, and a Proposal for Improvement, 2009 COLUM. BUS. L. REV. , 109.
  • 6严婷.信用评级机构“罪与罚”的背后[J],第一财经日报,2010-05-18(A10).
  • 7Franklin Strier, Rating the Raters : Conflicts of Interest in the Credit Rating Firms, Business and Society Review 113:4, pp. 533 - 553.
  • 8European Commission, Approval of New Regulation Will Raise Standards for the Issuance of Credit Ratings Used in the Commu- nity. Working Paper No. 1795, Brussels, 23 April 2009.
  • 9Frank Partnoy, The Paradox of Credit Ratings, U San Diego Law & Econ Research Paper, No. 20( October 2001 ), p. 3.
  • 10Theresa Nagy, Credit Rating Agencies and the First Amendment: Applying Constitutional Journalistic Protections to Subprime Mortgage Litigation, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 140. , November, 2009.

共引文献63

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部