期刊文献+

网络时代学术信息资源可信度研究 被引量:2

Study on the Credibility of Academic Information in Internet Environment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学术信息资源是一种特殊的信息资源产品,在研究和学术交流过程中发挥十分重要的作用。网络和数字环境下,信息量迅猛增长、传播方式日益复杂,受众方式五花八门,学术信息资源的可信度问题变得尤为重要。对学术信息资源及其可信度的概念和范围进行梳理辨析,分析了网络对学术信息资源可信度在产生、编辑加工和传播过程中的影响,并在此基础上对网络环境下如何提高学术信息资源可信度提出具体措施,以为提高学术信息资源的可信度研究提供新的思路。 As a special information product, academic information resources play an important role in the activity of scientific research and academic exchange. In digital network environment, owing to explosive growth of data and extremely complex spread mode, study on the credibility of academic information resources has become particularly important. This paper first describes the concept and domain of academic information resources and definition of their credibility, and then analyzes the impact of Internet on the credibility of academic information resources during their production, editing, processing and disseminating. Finally it presents some specific measures on how to improve the credibility of academic information in the Internet age.
作者 胡红亮
出处 《全球科技经济瞭望》 2013年第6期58-63,共6页 Global Science,Technology and Economy Outlook
关键词 学术信息 信息可信度 数字化 网络时代 academic information information credibility Digitalization lnternet age
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1林频.西方传媒可信度研究综述.新华文摘,2005,(21):152-154.
  • 2Flanagin A J, Metzger M J. Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility [J]. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2000, 77(3): 515-540.
  • 3West M D. Validating a Scale for the Measurement of Credibility: A Covariance Structure Modeling Approach [J]. Journalism Quarterly, 1994, 71 ( 1): 159-168.
  • 4刘琼.中国网络新闻可信度研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2009:33.
  • 5胡红亮.著作型学术出版物可信度评价初探[J].科技与出版,2012(12):102-104. 被引量:5
  • 6Smith A G. Testing the Surf: Criteria for Evaluating Intemet Information Resources [J]. Public Access-Computer Systems Review, 1997, 8(3) : 5-23.
  • 7The University of Tennessee. UT Receives Grant to Study Trustworthiness of Scholarly Research sources [EB/OL].(2012-08-06) [2013-03-10]. http://www.utk:edu/mtoday/2012/ 08/06/grant-to-study-trustworthiness-of-scholarly-research- sources/.
  • 8The Chicago Manual of Style[M]. 16th ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2010.
  • 9邬书林.加强学术著作出版规范 扎实推进文化繁荣发展[J].中国出版,2012(22):3-5. 被引量:10

二级参考文献2

共引文献13

同被引文献27

  • 1刘岳.孕产妇死亡的影响因素及降低孕产妇死亡率的对策[J].中国初级卫生保健,2004,18(10):47-51. 被引量:14
  • 2顾海良.关于学术规范与学术道德建设的思考[J].武汉大学学报(人文科学版),2005,58(5):517-519. 被引量:39
  • 3王少芳,李梅,李国强.孕产妇死亡情况分析及干预措施探讨[J].中国妇幼保健,2006,21(15):2072-2073. 被引量:11
  • 4陈百艳,沙春荣,林济森.吉林地区2005年孕产妇死亡分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2006,21(24):3389-3390. 被引量:1
  • 5Tansley Hey T, Tolle K. S.The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery [M]. Pan Jiadeng, Zhang Xiaolin, et al, Trans. Beijing: Science Press, 2012: 112-123.
  • 6Thomas. C.W. Maintaining and Restoring Public Trust in Government Agencies and Their Employees[J]. Adminis- tration & Electronic Commerce, 2001,5 (2) :232-235.
  • 7Charley Lane, Richard Bachmann. The Social Constitution of Trust: Supplier Relations in Britain and Germany[J]. Organization Studies, 1996, 17 (3) :343-351.
  • 8R. C. Mayer, J. H. Davis, F. D.Schoorman. An integrative Model of Organizational Trust[J]. Academy of Manage- ment Review, 1995,20(3) :211-217.
  • 9A.J.Flanagin, M.J.Metzger. Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility [J]. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2000,77 (3) :515-540.
  • 10L.G.Zucker.Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure: 1840-1920, in B M Staw & L L Cumm- ings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior[M]. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1986:112-123.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部