期刊文献+

专业化分工与广义价值论--基于消费-生产者两阶段决策方法的新框架 被引量:13

Complete Division of Labor and the General Theory of Value: A New Framework Based on Amended Approach of Consumer-Producers' Two-Stage Decisions
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文运用修正后的消费—生产者的一般均衡分析框架,试图为广义价值理论建立一个严谨坚实的微观基础。首先,本文在构建理论模型时,采用了"消费—生产者两阶段决策"方法,即消费—生产者首先选择最大化总产值的生产决策,继而选择最大化效用的消费决策,藉以修正新兴古典原有框架下分工模式与结构外生于消费—生产者选择行为的缺点。也就是说,在本文修正后的新兴古典框架中,分工的模式与结构是消费—生产者两阶段决策的内生结果。其次,本文不仅考虑到了市场出清条件,并且加入了部门间劳动力受产能限制下的配置条件即比较利益率相等原则,赋予了一般均衡系统更加具体且实际的经济涵义。最后,本文由生产函数的规模报酬特征和内生或外生的比较优势来定义不同的分工体系,从而使广义价值论涵盖了所有的分工体系,进而论证了无论是在可变分工、不变分工抑或是混合分工体系下,劳动价值论都只是广义价值论的一个特例。 This paper constructs a micro-foundation framework for the General Theory of Value by means of consumer- producers' two-stage decision approach, in which a consumer-producer at first makes his/her production decision to maximize total revenue, and consumption decision to maximize utility thereafter. The superiority in our newly amended approach over the original is that we endogenize configuration and structure of division of labor into individual choice behavior but the original doesn't. In our general equilibrium setting, moreover, not only are market-clearing conditions taken into account, but also allocation condition of labor force between production sectors of restrictive capacities, namely, Principle of Equivalent Rate of Comparative Advantage. In virtue of production functions' return-to-scale properties and endogenous/exogenous comparative advantage thereof, different division-of-labor systems are defined, and therefore described by this same theory Of value which concludes that no matter which kind of division-of-labor system it is, Marx's Labor Theory of Value is only a special case of ours.
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第7期132-142,共11页 Economic Research Journal
关键词 专业化分工 广义价值论 消费—生产者两阶段决策 Complete Division of Labor General Theory of Value Consumer-Producer's Two-Stage Decisions
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1蔡继明,1985 :《比较利益说巧劳动价值论》,《河南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》第6期.
  • 2蔡继明,江永基.广义价值论的基础及推广——兼答广义价值论的批评者[J].经济评论,2009(6):131-137. 被引量:6
  • 3蔡继明,江永基.基于广义价值论的功能性分配理论[J].经济研究,2010,45(6):132-142. 被引量:18
  • 4刘玉勋.评广义价值论[J].经济评论,2005(2):31-37. 被引量:9
  • 5杨小凯、黄行光,1999 :《专业化与经济组织——一种新兴古典微观经济学框架》,中译本,经济科学出版社.
  • 6岳宏志,寇雅玲.广义价值论批判——与蔡继明教授商榷[J].经济评论,2005(2):22-30. 被引量:8
  • 7Sachs, J. , X. Yang, and D. Zhang, 1999a, “Trade Pattern and Economic Development when Endogenous and Kxogenous Comparative Advantage Coexist",Harvard Center for International Development Working Paper, No. 3.
  • 8Sachs, J. , X. Yang, and I). Zhang, 1999b, “Patterns of Trade and Economic Development in the Model of Monopolistic Competition”,Harvard Center for International Development Working Paper, No. 14.
  • 9Yang, X. , 2001,Economics: New Classical versus Neoclassical Frameworks, Blackwell Publishers.
  • 10Yang, X.,and J. Borland, 1991,“A Microeconomic Mechanism for Economic Growlh”,Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99(3),460—482.

二级参考文献14

共引文献28

同被引文献204

引证文献13

二级引证文献170

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部