期刊文献+

X线平片与CT诊断脊椎转移瘤的临床对比研究 被引量:8

X-ray and CT Diagnosis of Spinal Metastatic Tumor Clinical Comparative Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨X线平片与CT诊断脊椎转移瘤的临床价值,以期为临床诊断提供良好的依据。方法回顾性分析2010年12月至2012年12月在陕西省宝鸡市中心医院进行影像学检查的35例脊椎转移瘤患者的临床资料,分别运用X线平片、CT检查,比较两者在诊断上的差异。结果 X线平片和CT在椎管受累、软组织肿胀、病理性骨折、骨质破坏或缺损、椎体形态改变上比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且两者在细微的病变中也有明显的差异,CT可发现X线平片无法显示的病变情况。结论优质的X平片能显示出脊椎转移瘤,而CT则对于发现早期的脊椎转移瘤以及细微的病变情况上有明显优势。 Objective To study the clinical value of X-ray and CT diagnosis for spinal metastatic tumor,in order to provide a good basis for clinical diagnosis.Methods Retrospective analysis on clinical data of 35 cases of spinal metastatic tumor for imaging inspection in Central Hospital of Baoji randomly selected from December 2010 to December 2012 was done,difference in diagnosis of X-ray and CT examination was compared.Results X-ray and CT had statistically significant difference(P 0.05) in the spinal canal involvement,soft tissue swelling,pathological fracture,bone destruction or defect,and vertebral body shape change,and obvious differences were observed in small lesions that CT could display lesions which couldn't be found on X-ray plain film.Conclusion The high quality X-ray can show spinal metastatic tumor,and CT has obvious advantages in finding the early spinal metastatic tumor and subtle lesions situation.
作者 何海林 习羽
出处 《医学综述》 2013年第13期2445-2447,共3页 Medical Recapitulate
关键词 CT X平片 脊椎转移瘤 诊断价值 CT X-ray plain film Spinal metastatic tumor Diagnostic value
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献62

共引文献28

同被引文献57

  • 1田志远,张鹏,左书耀.四种检查方法诊断脊椎转移瘤的对比分析[J].实用医技杂志,2007,14(7):860-861. 被引量:2
  • 2Moulopoulos LA , Kumar AI , Leeds NA .Second look at unenhanced spinal magnetic resonance imaging of malignant leptomeningeal disease[J]. Clin Imaging,1997(21 ) :252.
  • 3Gundry CR, Fritts HM. Magnetic resomance imaging of themusculoskeletal system: The spine [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,1998(346):262.
  • 4武宜,崔国强,李红梅.脊椎转移瘤MRI特点分析[J].实用医学影像杂志,2007,8(6):388-389. 被引量:1
  • 5Liu H, Liu Y, Yu T, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of pulmonary lesions [J ]. Eur Radiol,2010,20(4) :807 - 815.
  • 6Sung JK, Jee WH, Jung JY, et al. Differentiation of acute osteoporotic and malignant compression fractures of the spine: use of additive qualitative and quantitative axial diffusionweighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging at 3.0T [ J ]. Radiology, 2014,271 ( 2 ) :488 - 498.
  • 7Arevalo-Perez J, Peck KK, Lyo JK, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant vertebral fractures using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [ J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2015,42 (4) : 1 039 - 1 047.
  • 8Chu S, Karimi S, Peck KK, et al. Measurement of blood per- fusion in spinal metastases with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging:evaluation of tumor response to radiation therapy [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2013,38 (22) :El 418 - E1 424.
  • 9Martel Villagra J, Bueno Horcajadas a, Perez Fermandez E, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating between benign and malignant vertebral lesions:role of diffusion-weighted imaging, inhase/opposed-phase imagingand apparent diffusion coefficient [ J ]. Radiologia, 2015,57 (2) :142 - 149.
  • 10Rohren EM, Kosarek FJ, Helms CA. Discoid lateral meniscus and the frequency of meniscal tears [ J ]. Skeletal Radiol, 2001,30(6) :316 -320.

引证文献8

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部