期刊文献+

腰骶部椎间融合支架的改进及力学性能研究 被引量:1

Improvement and biomechanical measurement of allograft cortical fusion cage for lumbosacral interbody fusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较新型自制胫骨皮质支架与钛合金融合器、髂骨块在生物力学实验中的各项结果,了解新型胫骨皮质支架的生物力学稳定性,为临床应用提供理论依据。方法将16具小牛脊柱标本随机均分为4组:正常(NS)组、钛合金椎间融合支架(Tis)组、胫骨皮质融合支架(TS)组、髂骨块融合(LB)组,其中Tis、TS、LB组分别加后路内固定(F)记为TisF、TSF、LBF组。分别测定各组的应变、位移、刚度、极限力学指标等数据,采用F检验、SNK检验等,通过SPSS19.0软件进行统计学分析。结果实验显示在250 N载荷时,不同处理组在中立位时应变值排序结果如下:(TSF=NS=Tis=TisF)<LBF<TS<LB。载荷为250 N时各组中立位的纵向位移值大小排序:NS<TisF<TSF<LBF。载荷为250 N时各组中立位的水平位移大小排序:NS<(TisF=TSF)<LBF。不同应力强度的大小排序为:LB<LBF<TS<(TSF=Tis)<TisF。轴向刚度的大小顺序为:(TSF=LBF)<TisF<NS。弯曲刚度的大小排序为:LBF<TSF<TisF。极限载荷的大小排序为:TisF>TSF>LBF。结论改进后的异体骨支架的生物力学性能优于髂骨块,差于钛合金融合器。建议在使用支架时加用后路椎弓根钉内固定,以增加固定的强度。考虑到钛合金的金属特性及不可降解性,皮质骨支架在使用中可能有一定的优越性。 Objective To evaluate the biomechanical stability of a new kidney-shaped interbody fusion cage. Meth- ods Total 16 fresh calf spine specimens were randomly divided into four groups: NS (normal group) , TIS (titani- um interbody fusion stent group), TS ( tibial cortical bone fusion stent group ), LB ( iliac bone fusion group ), where Tis group,TS group, the LB group plus posterior fixation (F) was recorded as TisF, TSF, LBF group. The strain,migration,stress intensity, rigidity, the maximum biomechanics of the Tt2 -L5 segment were meaured on a Fluid-pressure univeral test machine in each group. The results of the experiments used the F test and SNK analysis by SPSS 19.0 software. Results The descending order of the strain of different grops was LB, TS, LBF, TSF, NS, Tis, TisF,while LBF, TSF, NS and TS were statistically equal. Then the descending order of the axial migration was LBF, TSF, TisF, NS. The descending order of the horizontal migration was LBF, TSF, TisF, NS, while TSF was equal to TisF statistically. Then the descending order of stress intensity was TisF,TSF, Tis,TS, LBF, LB, while TSF was e- qual to Tis. And the descending order of the axial rigidity was NS, TisF, LBF, TSF, while LBF was equal to TSF. The descending order of bending stiffness was TisF, TSF, LBF. At last, the descending order of limit load was TisF, TSF, LBF. Conclusion The biomechanical properties of the improved allogeneie bone scaffold is superior to the iliac bone, worse than the titanium fusion. It is proposed to use the cortical bone scaffold with posterior pedicle screw fix- ation, and can increase the stability of the fixation. Titanium interbody fusion cage has special characteristics as a kind of metal,and can not be degraded. However, cortical bone scaffold has some advantages in use.
出处 《安徽医科大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第8期929-932,共4页 Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
基金 安徽省科技厅面上攻关项目(编号:08010302194)
关键词 腰椎融合 腰椎融合器 皮质骨支架 生物力学 lumbar fusion interbody fusion cage tibial cortical scaffold biomechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Emery S E, Bolesta M J, Banks M A, et al. Robinson anterior cervical fusion comparison of the standard and modified techniques [J]. Spine, 1994, 19(6) : 660.
  • 2Kozak J A, Heilman A E, O'Brien J P. Anterior lumbar fusion op- tions technique and graft materials [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1994, 300:45 -51.
  • 3申才良,唐天驷,杨惠林.同种皮质骨融合支架的研制及临床应用[J].临床骨科杂志,2007,10(4):302-305. 被引量:3
  • 4刘忠厚.骨质疏松研究与防治[M].北京:化学工业出版社,1994.189-193.
  • 5Abbushi A, Cabraja M,Thomale U W, et al. the influence of cage positioning and cage type on cage migration and fusion rates in pa- tients with monosegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation [ J ]. Eur Spine J,2009,18 ( 11 ) : 1621 - 8.
  • 6Button G, Gupta M, Barrett C, et al. Three-to six-year follow-up of stand-alone BAK cages implanted by a single surgeon [ J ]. Spine J, 2005, 5(2) : 155 -60.
  • 7张绍东,吴小涛,唐天驷.腰椎间融合器的现状及发展方向[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15(7):443-446. 被引量:13
  • 8Bostman O M, Pihlajamaki H K. Adverse tissue reactions to bio- absorbable fixation devices [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2000, 371:216 -27.
  • 9McAfee P C, Cunningham B W, Lee G A, et al. Revision strate- gies for salvaging or improving failed cylindrical cages[ J]. Spine, 1999, 24(20) : 2147 -53.

二级参考文献34

  • 1Mulholland RC.Cages:outcome and complications[J].Eur Spine J, 2000,9(Suppl): 110-113.
  • 2Regan JJ, Yuan H, McAfee PC.Laparoscopic fusion of the lumbar spine:minimally invasive spine surgery:a prospective multicenter study evaluating open and laparoscopic lumbar fusion[J].Spine, 1999,24 (4):402-411.
  • 3Zdeblick TA, David SM.A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-L5 fusion:laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion[J].Spine,2000,25(20):2682-2687.
  • 4Rosenberg WS, Mummaneni PV.Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:technique,complications,and early results[J].Neurosurg, 2001,48 (3):569-575.
  • 5Humphreys SC,Hodge SD,Patwardham AG,et al. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion[J].Spine, 2001,26 (5):567-571.
  • 6Jie Zhao,Yong Hai, Nathaniel R,et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using posterolateral placement of a single cylindrical threaded cage[J].Spine,2000,25(4):425-430.
  • 7Hacker RJ. Comparison of interbody fusion approach for disabling low back pain[J].Spine,1997,22(6):660-666.
  • 8Ray CD. Threaded fusion cages for lumbar interbody fusions:an economic comparison with 360° fusion [J].Spine,1997,22(6):681-685.
  • 9James CH,Wong HK,Thambyah A,et al. Influence of PLIF cage size on lumbar spine stability[J].Spine,2000,25(1):35-40.
  • 10Boden SD, Zdeblick TA, Sandhu HS, et al. The use of rhBMP-2 in interbody fusion cages:definitive evidence of osteoinduction in human:a preliminary report [J].Spine,2000,25(3):376-381.

共引文献31

同被引文献16

  • 1申才良,唐天驷,杨惠林.同种皮质骨融合支架的研制及临床应用[J].临床骨科杂志,2007,10(4):302-305. 被引量:3
  • 2Campbell DG, Li P. Sterilization of HIV with irradiation: Relevance to infected bone allografts [ J ]. Aust N Z J Surg, 1999, 69(7) : 517-521.
  • 3Rozen B, Brosh T, Salai M, et al. The effects of prolonged deep freezing on the biomechanical properties of osteochondral allografts [ J ]. Cell Tissue Bank, 2009, 10 (1): 27-31.
  • 4Hamer A, Strachan JR, Black MM, et al. Biomechanical properties of cortical allograft bone using a new method of bone strength measurement-A comparison of fresh, fresh- frozen and irradiated bone [ J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 1996, (3) : 363-368.
  • 5Suarez LS, Richmond JC. Overview of procurement, pro- cessing, and sterilization of soft tissue allografts for sports medicine [J]. Sports Med Arthrosc, 2007, 15(3) : 106-113.
  • 6Pelker RR, Friedlaender GE, Markham TC. Biomechanical properties of bone allografts I J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1983, 174: 54"57.
  • 7Ilgenli T, Dundar N, Ilhan Kal B. Demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft and platelet-rich plasma vs platelet-rich plas- ma alone in infrabony defects: A clinical and radiographic evaluation [J]. Clin Oral Invest, 2007, 11(1): 51-59.
  • 8Jerosch J, Muchow H, Clahsen H. Stability of human bone cortex following various preservation and sterilization meth- ods [J]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 1991, 129(4) : 295-301.
  • 9Wolfinbarger L, Zhang Y, Adam BLT, et aL A comprehen- sive study of physical parameters, biomechanical proper- ties, and statistical correlations of lilac crest bone wedges used in spinal fusion surgery. I. Physical parameters and their correlations ~J]. Spine, 1994, 19(3) : 277-283.
  • 10Hoburg A, Keshlaf S, Schmidt T, et aL Fractionation of high-dose electron beam irradiation of BPTB grafts provides significantly improved viscoelastic and structural properties compared to standard gamma irradiation [ J ]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2011, 19( 11 ) : 1955-1961.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部