期刊文献+

足月妊娠羊水过少患者不同分娩方式的观察 被引量:29

Pregnancy outcomes of different delivery patterns with oligohydramnios at term
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对我院2005年、2006年及2010年因羊水过少住院分娩产妇290例进行回顾性分析。其中2005年无引产剖宫产50例,2006年采用控释地诺前列酮栓促宫颈成熟及引产,2010年采用控释地诺前列酮栓或双球囊导管促宫颈成熟及引产。2年中引产后剖宫产29例,引产后阴道分娩122例。结果显示:①我院2005年、2006年及2010年羊水过少患者的剖宫产率分别为83%、57%和37%,其中无引产剖宫产率分别为52%、22%和7%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。②羊水过少患者中无引产剖宫产、引产后剖宫产及引产后阴道分娩的产后出血率分别为8%、3%和3%,差异无统计学意义,但24 h平均失血量的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 Total of 290 oligohydramnios women were admitted to deliver in our hospital in 2005, 2006 and 2010. From 2006, we began to use dinoprostone vaginal inserts for cervical ripening and induction of labour, and used double-balloon catheters from 2010. In 2005 there were cesarean section(CS) 50 cases of without induction of la- bor, and in 2006 and 2010 29 cases of cesarean section after induction of labor and 122 cases of vaginal delivery af- ter induction of labor. Results showed that (1) The CS rate (CSR) of oligohydramnios women decreased from 2005, 2006 to 2010 (83% , 57% and 37% respectively, P 〈 0.01 ) , and the rate of CS without induction of labour (CWIL) decreased significantly (52%, 22% and 7% respectively, P 〈 0. 01 ). (2) The volume of postpartum blood loss during CWIL was the highest, which compared with CS after induction of labour (CAIL) and vaginal de- livery after induction of labour (VAIL) was significantly different (P 〈 0. 05 ).
出处 《安徽医科大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第8期985-987,共3页 Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
基金 南京军区医药卫生科研项目(编号:10MB016) 国家自然科学基金(编号:81270718)
关键词 羊水过少 促宫颈成熟 控释地诺前列酮栓 oligohydramnios cervical ripening induction of labour dinoprostone vaginal insert
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献50

  • 1余丽萍.口服小剂量米索前列醇混悬液用于足月妊娠引产的临床观察[J].中国妇幼保健,2005,20(13):1598-1600. 被引量:11
  • 2黄燕萍,刘正平.宫颈成熟的研究进展[J].国外医学(妇产科学分册),1996,23(2):78-81. 被引量:43
  • 3谢华,封全灵(审校).缩宫素受体及其相关疾病的研究[J].河南医学研究,2006,15(4):369-372. 被引量:5
  • 4段涛,杨慧霞.高危妊娠[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:1149-1157.
  • 5WHO. Intemational statistical classification of diseases and related health problem (ICD-10). 10^th rev. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 1993.
  • 6Hill K, Thomas K, AbouZahr C, et al. Estimates of maternal mortality worldwide between 1990 and 2005: an assessment of available data. Lacet, 2007,370 (9595) : 1311-1319.
  • 7WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA. Maternal mortality in 2000: estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA. Geneva: WHO, 2004.
  • 8Betran AP, Wojdyla D, Posner SF, et al. National estimates for maternal mortality: an analysis based on the WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. BMC Public Health, 2005,5: 131-142.
  • 9梁娟 王艳萍 朱军 等.孕产妇步匕亡率与支持性指标的关系分析[J].中国妇幼保健杂志,2008,23(21):2945-2948.
  • 10Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, et al. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet, 2006, 367 (9516) : 1066-1074.

共引文献215

同被引文献203

引证文献29

二级引证文献150

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部