摘要
合理预见规则对于解决违约精神赔偿范围和程度难以确定可能导致的有失公允问题,衡平违约精神损害赔偿纠纷中的利益关系具有不可替代的重要作用。违约精神损害赔偿中的合理预见应遵循"违约人与受害人双主体承担预见义务"、"预见义务的时间界定为违约之时"、"以理性第三人认识作为预见标准"、"预见内容限定为损失的原因、种类和范围"、"预见程度仅作为故意违约情形下的例外要求"等特殊法则。
There is an irreplaceable and important effect when the reasonable foreseeing rule is applied to resolve the unfair problem resulting from hard to determine the scope and extent of mental distress compensation for breach of contract, and effectively weigh the interest relations in mental distress compensation for breach of contract case. Furthermore, the special rules, such as "the party of breach of contract and the victim together bear the foreseeing obligation"," the time of foreseeing obligation is defined as the time of breach" ," the understanding of rational third person acts as the foreseeing standard" , " the foreseeing contents is limited to the cause, type and scope of the loss " , " the foreseeing extent is only regarded as the exceptional obligation that the party willfully default contract ", must be abided by.
出处
《科学.经济.社会》
CSSCI
2013年第2期112-115,120,共5页
Science Economy Society
基金
盐城师范学院科研基金项目"违约之诉中的精神损害赔偿研究"(项目号08YCKW017)研究成果
关键词
违约
精神损害
合理预见
因果关系
breach of contract
mental distress
reasonable foreseeing
causality