期刊文献+

应对REACH的竞争法视角 被引量:1

Dealing with REACH:From the Perspective of Competition Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 欧盟REACH法规实施以来中欧化学品贸易大受影响。世界各国对该法规开始时普遍质疑、反对,后来逐步接受和主动履行,但仍积极研究REACH法规的应对之策。主流观点认为REACH法规与WTO规则不符,因而试图通过WTO解决争议,然而收效甚微。从竞争法视角来看,REACH法规作为欧盟通过政府干预市场的手段,特别是在联合体、数据交换等问题上,与竞争法存在很大矛盾。该法规可能导致欧盟化学品企业形成垄断,中国化学品企业对其可能出现的违反竞争法的情况,可以运用反垄断法手段诉诸法律。 Ever since EU REACH regulations were put to use, the trade volume of chemicals between EU and China has been on the decline. Many other countries' attitude towards REACH has experienced a change from wide doubt and strong criticism at the very beginning to later gradual acceptance and positive fulfillment. However, research on the countermesures to REACH has never stopped all over the world. Based on the popular viewpoint that REACH regulations are inconsistent with WTO rules, efforts to resolve such disputes through WTO were made but with little success. From the perspective of competition law, REACH is a way of EU^s intervening in the market through government, which conflicts with competition law, especially in consortia and data exchange. As compliance of REACH may lead to EU chemical companies' cartel and monopoly, the Chinese chemical companies should resort to such competition laws as antitrust when infraction arises.
作者 隋军
出处 《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期414-417,共4页 Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(NO90414001)
关键词 REACH 联合体 卡特尔 垄断 registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction of chemicals consortia cartel antitrust
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Kubasek N K,Silverman G S. Evironmental Law [M].6th ed.北京:清华大学出版社,2008: 283 - 284.
  • 2蔡岩红.中国出口企业遭遇“入世”以来最大贸易壁垒[N].法制日报,2007 -06 -03(9).
  • 3Gillies D. A Guide to EC Environmental Law[M].London: Earthscan, 2009:40-42.
  • 4中国化工经济技术发展中心.欧盟REACH法规解读——REACH法规对中国石油和化工行业的影响及应对[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2008:149 - 162.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部