反垄断司法解释的范式与路径

Paradigm and Path of Judicial Interpretation of Antitrust Law

反垄断司法解释是反垄断法实施的逻辑前提亦是重要组成部分,我国《反垄断法》因借鉴域外经验并采取简约型立法模式而更需解释。囿于现行法律解释体制和市场经济现状,法院通常依据自身解决问题的逻辑需要而对《反垄断法》作出先验性的解释规范。这虽在一定程度上缓解了文本与市场间的紧张关系,但因我国市场经济体制不成熟、法治程度不高和竞争文化传统缺失等客观因素而实际并未达到司法解释的原初目的即明确文本规范的内涵与法律意义。同时,在具体操作中面临场景缺位、目标错位以及解释权越位等现实问题,反垄断司法解释更多地体现为法院的"立法式"解释活动,有违现代法治理念。因此,目前亟需在对我国反垄断司法解释所处的场域进行考量的基础上,明确解释范畴,转变解释思维并重塑解释目标,以期多维度优化反垄断司法解释,保障反垄断法得以有效实施。

Judicial interpretation is both the logic premise and the inseperable part of the anti-monopoly law implementation. Because of learning from foreign experience and adpoting the intensive legislative model, our Anti-Monopoly Law is more expected to interpret. Confined to the existing legal interpretative system and the status quo of the market-oriented economy, the Supreme People＇ s Court usually makes the priori interpretative norms of the Law, according to their logic convenience of resolving the issues. This to some extent eases the tension between the book law and the market regulation, but does not reach the fundamental purposes, that is, to clarify the meanings and legal senses of book law, because of immature market-oriented economy, poor rule of law and the loss of competitive cutural tradition. At the meanwhile, confronted with the loss of the interpretative fields, the dislocation of the interpretative purposes and the offside of the interpretative power, the judicial interpretation of the Law becomes to be the Court＇ s legislative actions, which is against the modern concept of rule of law. Therefore, based on the re-examination of the fields where the judicial interpretation of the Law is done, it is essential and urgent to define the interpretative range, transfer the interpretative thinking way and reshape the interpretative purposes, in order to optimize the judicial interpretation from the multiple aspects and guarantee the effective implementation of Anti-Monopoly Law.