期刊文献+

“如果”独立条件句:基于心理空间-转喻推理模型 被引量:4

Stand-alone Conditionals by ruguo:Based on the Model of Mental Spaces and Metonymic Inferencing
原文传递
导出
摘要 "如果"独立条件句指省略主句的"如果"条件复句,本文建立"心理空间—转喻推理模型"研究主句省略的缘由以及独立条件句的理解。结果表明,"如果"作为空间建构语以现实空间为起点触发了假设空间,但主句内容已存在于现实空间,成为衬托从句内容的背景,因而可被省略;假设空间里从句或主句或二者共同激活言语行为脚本,从而实施"请求"、"给予"、"抱怨"等间接言语行为;Dancygier&Sweetser(2005)关于言语行为条件句的部分论述值得商榷。 The stand-alone conditionals introduced by ruguo, containing only the protasis, can be studied based on the model of mental spaces and metonymic inferencing in order to explain why to omit the apodosis and how to interpret such condition- als. The findings are that ruguo as a space builder evokes a hypothesis space, relative to the reality space in which the infer- enced apodosis exists and provides the background for the protasis, and thus the apodosis may be omitted. Moreover, in the hypothesis space the protasis or/and the apodosis can evoke the speech-act scenario to perform indirect speech acts such as re- quest, offers, complaints. Finally, the findings are partly opposed to Dancygier & Sweetser (2005) ' s account of speech-act conditionals.
作者 孙亚
出处 《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期11-14,共4页 Foreign Language Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“商务话语的批评隐喻分析:基于语料库方法”(项目编号:12YJC740092)的研究成果
关键词 “如果”独立条件句 心理空间 转喻推理 stand-alone conditionals by ruguo mental space metonymic inferencing
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Croft, W. & D. A. Cruse. Cognitive Linguistics [ M ]. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 2004.
  • 2Brdar-Szabo, R. Metonymy in indirect directives: Stand-alone conditionals in English, German, Hungarian, and Croatian[A]. In K. Panther, L. L. Thornburg & A. Barcelona ( eds. ). Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar [ C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 201)9: 323-338.
  • 3Dancygier, B. Conditionals and Prediction [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  • 4Dancygier, B. & E. E. Sweetser. Mental Spaces in Grammar[ M ] . Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  • 5Fauconnier, G. Mental Spaces [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985/1994.
  • 6Fauconnier, G. Mappings in Thought and Language[ M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • 7Leech, G. Principles of Pragmatics[M]. Essex: Longman Group Limited, 1983.
  • 8Panther, K. & L. L. Thornburg. Metonymies as natural inference and ac- tivation schemas[A]. In K. Panther & L. L. Thomburg(eds. ). Metony- my antt Pragmatic Inferencing[ C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publish- ing Company, 2003 : 127-148.
  • 9Panther, K. The role of metonymy in meaning construction[A]. In Fran- cisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibdfiez & M. Sandra Pefia Cervel(eds. ). Cognitive 2Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and lnterdisc@inary Interaction[ C ]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005: 352-386.
  • 10Thornburg, L. L. & K. Panther. Speech act metonymies[ A ]. In W. Liebert, G. Redeker & L. Waugh ( eds. ). Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive L/ngu/st/cs [ C ]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Compa- ny, 1997: 205-222.

二级参考文献171

共引文献152

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部