摘要
本文对比了L2写作教学中对称性和非对称性同伴反馈在反馈过程与反馈效果上的异同。对同伴反馈过程的调查显示两组之间在话题种类和数量、指导者提出的修改层面和维度上没有显著性差异。在互动模式上,对称组更多采用合作型互动模式,指导者和学习者之间可以平等的交流;非对称组较多采用非合作型互动模式,指导者主要控制话语权。对同伴反馈效果的调查表明两组之间在同伴反馈采纳率和对作文修改稿质量的影响上无显著性差异。
This study compares the process and product between symmetrical and asymmetrical feedback. The findings in the investigation of feedback process suggest that there is no significant difference between these two groups in the type and number of topics, and tutors' feedback levels and dimensions. However, in interaction pattern symmetrical group mainly adopts col- laborative feedback, in which both tutors and learners contribute equally to the interaction, while asymmetrical group usually adopts non-collaborative feedback, in which tutors dominate the interaction process. The findings in the study of feedback product suggest that there is no significant difference between these two groups in the adoption of feedback and the effect of feedback on writing quality.
出处
《外语教学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第4期50-55,共6页
Foreign Language Education
基金
教育部2010年度人文社会科学青年基金项目(项目编号:10YJC740055)
暨浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题“外语写作教学中的动态评估模型构建及其实证研究”(项目编号:10CGWW13YB)的阶段性成果