期刊文献+

不同干扰类型对呼伦贝尔草甸草原群落结构及物种多样性影响的比较 被引量:14

Comparative Study on Effects of Different Disturbances on Community Structure and Species Diversity in Hulunbuir Meadow Steppe
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用样方法,对比研究了2009—2011年刈割和围封干扰对呼伦贝尔草甸草原植物群落结构和物种多样性的影响.结果表明:2009—2011年,围封干扰下建群种种群相对重要值分别为15.67%、17.73%、17.60%;而刈割干扰下建群种种群相对重要值分别为16.86%、14.84%、12.36%,呈明显下降趋势;表明围封干扰可促进建群种种群生长,而刈割则有一定的抑制作用.2种干扰类型导致的植物群落生态类型变化趋势差异尚不显著.2009—2011年,刈割干扰下,Margalef物种丰富度指数分别为6.05、4.58、4.27,Shannon-Wiener多样性指数分别为3.13、2.89、2.79,Pielou均匀度指数分别为0.90、0.91、0.90;围封干扰下,Margalef物种丰富度指数分别为6.46、6.03、5.32,Shannon-Wiener多样性指数分别为3.26、3.18、2.98,Pielou均匀度指数分别为0.87、0.87、0.85.可见,在相同年份,刈割干扰下Margalef物种丰富度指数和Shannon-Wiener多样性指数均低于围封干扰,Pielou均匀度指数均高于围封干扰.说明围封干扰有利于植物物种多样性的维持,而适度的刈割干扰则有利于植物群落的均一化. Effects of two disturbances (mowing and enclosure) on community structure and plant species diversity in Hulunbuir meadow steppe were studied by the controlled experiments and quadrat method. Results showed that relative importance of constructive species increased from 15.67% to 17.60% for enclosing treatment, while it decreased from 16. 86% to 12. 36% for mowing treatment. This indicated that enclosure promoted the growth of constructive species and mowing prohibited the growth in 3 years. There was no significant difference between variation trends of plant ecotypes under the two disturbances. During the period of 2009-2011, enclosure treatment ( Margalef index : 6.46, 6.03 and 5.32 ; Shannon-Wiener index : 3.26, 3.18 and 2, 98 ; Pielou index : 0. 87, 0. 87 and 0. 85 ) showed a higher species diversity and lower evenness than that under the mowing treatment-( Margalef index: 6. 05, 4. 58 and 4. 27 ; Shannon- Wiener index: 3.13, 2.89 and 2. 79 ; Pielou index: 0. 90, 0. 91 and 0.90). This suggested that enclosure preserves species diversity and mowing could be helpful for homogegization of vegetation community.
出处 《环境科学研究》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第7期765-771,共7页 Research of Environmental Sciences
基金 国家环境保护公益性行业科研专项(201109025) 国家"十二五"科技支撑计划项目(2012BAC01B00) 中国环境科学研究院改革启动专项(2012-YSGQ-06)
关键词 刈割 围封 群落结构 物种多样性 呼伦贝尔草甸草原 mowing enclosure community structure speciesdiversity Hulunbuir meadow steppe
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1初秀贤,谭继强,侯代军,韩国刚.中国2020年草原、水土流失展望[J].环境科学研究,1991,4(S1):102-103. 被引量:1
  • 2COLLINS S L,GLENN S M,GIBSON D J. Experimental analysis of intermediate disturbance and initial floristic composition : decoupling cause and effect[ J]. Ecology,1995,76(2) :486-492.
  • 3TIMOTHY E,FULBRIGHT. Disturbance effects on species richness of herbaceous plants in a semi-arid habit [ J ]. Journal of Arid Environments ,2004,58 ( 1 ) : 119-133.
  • 4FU Lintao,BO Tianli,DU Guozhen,et al. Modeling the response of grassland vegetation coverage to grazing disturbance in an alpine meadow [ J ]. Ecological Modeling, 2012,247 : 221 - 232.
  • 5王明君,韩国栋,崔国文,赵萌莉.放牧强度对草甸草原生产力和多样性的影响[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(5):862-868. 被引量:92
  • 6金晓明,韩国栋.放牧对草甸草原植物群落结构及多样性的影响[J].草业科学,2010,27(4):7-10. 被引量:33
  • 7陈宝瑞,杨桂霞,张宏斌,段庆伟,辛晓平.不同干扰类型下羊草种群的空间格局[J].生态学报,2010,30(21):5868-5874. 被引量:23
  • 8WANG K H, MCSORLEY R, BOHLEN P, et al. Cattle grazing increases microbiM biomass and alters soil nematode communities in subtropical pastures [ J ]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2006,38 (7) :1956-1965.
  • 9BERTILLER M B. Grazing effects on sustainable semiarid rangelands in Patagonia: the state and dynamics of the soil seed bank[J]. Environ Manage,1996,20( 1 ) :123-132.
  • 10MEISSNER R A, FACELLI J M. Effect of sheep exclusion on the soil seed bank and annual vegetation in ehenopod shrub lands of South Australian[ J]. Journal of Arid Environment, 1999,42 ( 2 ) : 117-128.

二级参考文献246

共引文献463

同被引文献221

引证文献14

二级引证文献102

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部