论认罪案件的证明模式

On the Proof Mode of Confession Case

我国目前认罪案件的证明模式是一种形式印证模式,这种模式以其他单个证据与口供印证,但并不能保证事实认定的准确性,反而强化了口供的中心地位,使非法口供更难以排除。因此,应当对认罪案件的证明模式进行改造,构建推理-印证证明模式,先以口供之外的其他证据进行证据推理,再以得出的推理结论与口供进行综合审查,最终认定案件事实。这样可以在证据审查中不再绝对依赖口供,促进准确审查单个证据的客观真实性,避免错误认定案件事实。为此,应当改进单个证据的审查方法,在简易程序中进行有效的举证质证,并提高法官的证据推理和论证能力。

The proof mode of confession case in China is a kind of formal corroboration mode,in which all other evidences are corroborated with confession.However,the accuracy of fact finding can＇t be guaranteed,and the central status of confession is on the contrary strengthened.Therefore the new proof mode,i.e.,the mode of inference-corroboration should be set up.In that mode,other evidences besides confession are sifted first,then the result of inference and confession are comprehensively reviewed,and at last find out the case facts.In this way,by avoiding the complete dependence on confession,the accuracy of fact finding is boosted and thus mistakes in fact finding can be prevented from happening.The sifting method of evidences should be bettered,and effective adducing and confronting evidence should also be carried out in summary procedure.Moreover,judges should have better evidential reasoning and argumentation ability.