期刊文献+

常规化学检测项目室间质量评价数据统计新方法探讨 被引量:9

The study on new statistical method for the data of external quality assessment in routine chemistry items
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨一种新的定量检测项目室间质评数据统计方法。方法选取2011年参加卫生部临床检验中心常规化学室间质量评价的实验室结果。采用新的统计方法进行分析,在目前室间质评的基础上增加标准差、传统的Z比分数和稳健的Z比分数评价指标,同时还增加结果与中位数的相对差值,表达为允许差值的百分数,并将多次结果进行标准化后绘制在一张图上。结果传统的Z比分数和稳健的Z比分数更能反应结果的一致性;使用百分比相对差(D%)代替现有的偏差(%)。另外,将多次的结果绘制在一张图上,采用标准化的方式来显示每次室间质量评价结果的可比性。结论新的数据统计方法更科学、合理,有利于室间质评工作及参加实验室的检验质量的持续改进。 Objective To study a new statistical method for the data of external quality assessment in quantitative determination items.Methods The results of Ministry of Health National Center for Clinical Laboratory external quality assessment for routine chemistry items 2011 were collected.The data were analyzed by a new statistical method.The standard deviation,the traditional Z-score and robust Z-score were added,and the relative difference with the median was added and expressed as the percentage of the allowed difference.The multiple results were plotted on a standardized chart.Results The traditional and robust Z-scores can reflect the consistency of results.The percentage of relative difference D% was used to replace the existing deviation(D%) or bias(%).In addition,it is helpful to compare directly by plotting multiple results in one chart,demonstrating the comparability for each external quality assessment result in the standardization way.Conclusions It is more scientific and appropriate to use the new statistical method for the data of external quality assessment,as it is also helpful for the external quality assessment and continual quality improvement in participating laboratories.
出处 《检验医学》 CAS 2013年第7期625-628,共4页 Laboratory Medicine
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划资助项目(2011AA02A102 2011AA02A116)
关键词 室间质量评价 Z比分数 常规化学 External quality assessment Z-score Routine chemistry
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1童清,王清涛.临床化学定量测定室间质量评价的有关问题[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(2):131-133. 被引量:36
  • 2陈文祥,申子瑜,郭健,杨振华.临床检验量值溯源中的重要术语与概念及有关问题[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(2):142-146. 被引量:35
  • 3Sciacovelli L, Secchiero S, Zardo L, et al. External Quality Assessment Schemes: need for recognised requirements. Clin Chim Acta, 2001,309 : 183-199.
  • 4Miller WG. Specimen materials, target values and commutability for external assessment (proficiency testing) schemes. Clin Chim Acta, 2003, 327 : 25-37.
  • 5Shahangian S. Proficiency testing in laboratory medicine uses and limitations. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 1998, 122 : 15-30.
  • 6Laessig RH, Ehmeyer SS. Use of computer modeling to predict the magnitude of intralaboratory error tolerated by proposed CDC interlabomtory proficiency testing performance criteria. Clin Chem, 1988, 34 : 1849-1853.
  • 7Ricos C, Baadenhuijsen H, Libber C J, et al. External quality assessment:currently used criteria for evaluation performance in european countries, and criteria for future harmonization. Clin Chem Clin Biochem, 1996, 34: 159-165.
  • 8Ehmeyer SS, Laessig RH. Interlaboratory proficiency-testing programs: a computer model to assess their capability to correctly characterize intralaboratory performance. Clin Chem, 1987, 33 : 784-787.
  • 9国家质量技术监督局.GB/T15483.1-1999,利用实验室间比对的能力验证PT.第1部分:能力验证计划的建立和运作.北京:中国标准出版社,1999.
  • 10Middle JG, Libeer JC, Malakhov V, et al. Characterisation and evaluation of external quality assessment scheme serum. Clin Chem Lab Med, 1998, 36:119-130.

共引文献52

同被引文献45

引证文献9

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部