期刊文献+

工程项目风险分担测量研究:模型构建、量表编制与效度检验 被引量:11

A Study of Risk Allocation Measurement of Construction Project:Model Construction,Development of Scale and Validity Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 风险分担作为影响项目管理绩效的重要前因变量,已成为工程项目管理绩效改善相关研究的热点,但鲜见对其进行操作化测量的研究。本文基于不完全契约理论,将不完全的初始契约与再谈判分别映射于工程项目风险分担过程,构建了一个缔约阶段的初始风险分担与履约阶段的风险再分担的两阶段理论模型,并对其操作化测量维度进行了刻画;通过问卷设计与实证分析,开发了工程项目风险分担量表并进行了信效度检验。结果表明:工程项目风险分担可以通过初始风险分担与风险再分担分别测量,初始风险分担的测量包括完备性、可执行性及激励性3个维度;风险再分担可通过目标合理性、过程有效性2个维度测量。该研究对于工程项目风险分担的合同安排及与其他变量的关联性探索具有指导意义。 As an important antecedent of project management performance, risk allocation (RA) has become a research focus but lack of its operation of measurement. Based on the theory of incomplete contract, the paper mapped the initial contract and renegotiation to the project risk allocation, constructed the two-stage theoretical model including initial RA at contracting and risk realloeation at contract performance stage, and depicted their measuring dimensions. In addition, the paper developed risk allocation measure scale on the basis of questionnaire design and empirical analysis, and ana- lyzed its reliability and validity. The results show that project RA can be measured by initial RA and risk reallocation. The initial RA comprises three dimensions of completeness, enforceability, and incentive, and risk reallocation can be measured by the rationality of goal and the effectiveness of process, which have guiding significance to contractual arrangements of RA and exploring the correlation between RA and the other variable.
作者 尹贻林 赵华
出处 《预测》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期8-14,共7页 Forecasting
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172175 70772058)
关键词 风险分担 初始风险分担 风险再分担 量表 risk allocation initial risk allocation risk realloeating scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献48

  • 1赵华,严玲,周国栋.政府投资项目代建制关键治理因子研究[J].财经问题研究,2009(5):74-81. 被引量:8
  • 2Rahman M M, Kumarswamy M M. Risk managementtrends in the construction industry : moving towards jointrisk management [ J ]. Engineering, Construction andArchitectural Management,2002,9(2) : 131-151.
  • 3Levitt R E,Ashley D B, Logcher R D. Allocating riskand incentive in construction [ J ]. Journal of the Con-struction Division, 1980,106(3) : 297-305.
  • 4Loosemore M, McCarthy C S. Perception of contractualrisk allocation in construction supply chains [ J ]. Journalof Professional Issues in Eduction and Practice,2008,(1): 95-105.
  • 5Oudot J M. Risk-allocation: theoretical and empiricalevidences,application to public-private partnerships inthe defense sector[ A]. The 9th Annual Conference of theInstitutions of Market Exchange[ C ]. Barcelona, Spain,2005. 23-25.
  • 6Lam K C, Wang D,Patricia T K, et al.. Modelling riskallocation decision in construction contracts [ J ]. InternationalJournal of Project Management, 2007 , 25(5) : 485-493.
  • 7Loosemore M , Raftery J, Reilly C,et al. . Risk manage-ment in projects [ M ] . London : Taylor & Francis, 2006.
  • 8Ahmed S M , Ahmad R, De Saram D D. Risk manage-ment trends in the Hong Kong construction industry: acomparison of contractors and owners perceptions [ J ].Engineering, Construction and Architectural Manage-ment, 1999,6(3) : 225-234.
  • 9Hartman F, Snelgrove P. Risk allocation in lump-sumcontracts-concept of latent dispute [ J ]. Journal of Con-struction Engineering and Management, 1996,(9):291-296.
  • 10Medda F. A game theory approach for the allocation ofrisks in transport public private partnerships[ J]. Inter-national Journal of Project Management, 2007,25(3):213-218.

二级参考文献400

共引文献889

同被引文献115

引证文献11

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部