期刊文献+

休闲视野下的三曹分析 被引量:1

The Three Caos' analysis on leisure Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从休闲的视角对三曹探讨,有利于理解他们的真实性、丰富性。三曹在休闲之余都热衷于文学创作,曹操对文学的态度是“歌以咏志”,曹丕则认为文学是“不朽之盛事”,而曹植的文学创作只是他寻求政治理想的替代品;游宴活动是三曹休闲的另一种形式,曹操在游宴之时不忘政治寄寓,曹丕的游宴多是娱乐,作为游宴配角的曹植,更多的是附和;关于养生,曹操与曹植一样,由刚开始不相信神仙、方术到后来注重养生、甚至渴望在神仙世界里解脱自我,相比之下,曹丕倒较为理性;曹操对于酒可以说是操纵自如,他饮过酒、献过酒并戒过酒,曹丕认为酒能成礼也能败德,曹植则饮酒不节;在其他的休闲活动中,三曹都喜欢武略,曹丕的休闲更多的是娱乐性、享受型,曹植的爱好则更趋向于文人化;曹氏父子在历史的舞台上留下永远的丰碑,从休闲的角度来观照他们,父子三人在显示各自特点的同时,其实离我们普通人并不遥远。 It is real and rich to understand Three Caos from the perspective of leisure, Three Caos were interested in literary creation leisurefully. Cao Cao' s literary attitude was his effusion, Cao Pi considered that literature could ereate great achievement. But Cao Zhi' s literary creation just seeked the substitutes of political ideal ; feast activitision was another form of leisure, Cao Cao did not forget political partygoing. On the other hand,Cao Pi always had much entertainment,and Cao Zhi echoed other people' s views; Cao Cao didn' t believe the fairy at the beginning, but he changed his tune finally, So did Cao Zhi. They even desired for self,liberation in the fairy world. Cao Pi was rational by contrast; wine was manipulated by Cao Cao with ease, he drinked wine, offered wine and quited wine, and Cao Pi considered that wine could do bad things and good things, but Cao Zhi was unable to control drinking. They all liked martial arts, and Cao Pi prefered with morrecreational, enjoyable activities, Cao Zhi's hobbies were more scholarly. The three persons achieved outstanding results in history. They had different charaeteristics from the perspective of leisure. And we found that they were similar to ordinary people in reality.
作者 赵立春
出处 《焦作大学学报》 2013年第3期30-33,共4页 Journal of Jiaozuo University
基金 亳州师范高等专科学校2010年度立项课题《三曹与魏晋休闲文化》成果之一,项目编号(BSJKY0908)
关键词 休闲 三曹 分析 leisure Three Caos analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

共引文献82

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部