期刊文献+

支持向量机在预测鼻咽癌患者5年生存状态中的应用 被引量:2

Application of Support Vector Machine in Predicting 5-Year Survival Status of Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的运用支持向量机(SVM)建立预测鼻咽癌患者5年生存状态的预测模型,并与医学领域中广泛运用的人工神经网络(ANN)模型进行比较,探索鼻咽癌预后研究的新方法。方法收集2005年1月至2007年12月医院诊治的130例鼻咽癌患者的临床资料,分为两组,一组作为训练样本,用于筛选变量及建立预测模型,计104例;一组作为验证样本,用于评价模型效果,计26例。采用单因素分析筛选建模变量,然后利用ANN及SVM建立鼻咽癌患者5年生存状态预测模型并评价其效果。结果单因素分析显示,年龄、T分期、N分期、M分期、92福州分期、卡氏生活质量评分(KPS评分)、颅底骨质破坏、颅神经损伤、咽旁间隙侵犯、确诊到放疗时间、鼻咽疗效、颈部淋巴结疗效共12项指标与鼻咽癌患者的5年生存状态相关(P<0.05)。验证组验证显示,ANN模型预测患者5年生存状态的准确率、敏感度和特异度分别为88.5%,87.5%和90.0%,而SVM模型预测患者5年生存状态的准确率、敏感度和特异度分别为96.2%,93.8%和100%。结论采用SVM预测模型能较好地判断鼻咽癌患者5年后的生存状态,为个体化地预测患者的预后提供了一种新方法,其效能优于ANN预测模型。 Objective To establish the predictive models of 5-year survival status in the patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma by using the support vector machine( SVM), and to compare it with the widely applied artificial neural network( ANN) model for exploring the new method for the research of nasopharyngeal carcinoma prognosis.Methods The cinical data in 130 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma admitted to our hospital from January 2005 to December 2007 were collected and divided into 2 groups,one group( 104 cases) as the training sample for screening the variables and establishing the prediction model and the another group( 26 cases) as confirmation sample for evaluating the model effect.The single factor analysis was adopted to screen the variables for establishing the predictive model.Then ANN and SVM were used to establish the predictive models for 5-year survival status in the patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.The effect was also evaluated.Results The single factor analysis showed that 12 variables,including age,T stage,N stage,M stage,92 Fuzhou stage,KPS score,destruction of skull base bone,damage of cranial nerves,invasion of parapharyngeal space,time from diagnosis to radiotherapy,treatment effect of nasopharynx and of cervical lymph node,were related with the 5-year survival status( P 0.05).By the evaluation of confirmation group,the accuracy,sensitivity and specificity of the ANN model were 88.5%,87.5% and 90.0% respectively,whereas which of the SVM model were 96.2%,93.8% and 100% respectively.Conclusion The model based on SVM could better predict the 5-year survival status in the patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma,provides a new method to individually predict the prognosis.The efficacy of the SVM model is superior to that of the ANN model.
出处 《中国药业》 CAS 2013年第14期28-30,共3页 China Pharmaceuticals
基金 四川省卫生厅科学研究基金项目 项目编号:100353 攀枝花市科技服务民生行动项目 项目编号:2010cy-s-1(5)
关键词 鼻咽癌 生存状态 支持向量机 人工神经网络 nasopharyngeal carcinoma survival status support vector machine artificial neural network
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Nada Lavracea. Data mining and visualization for decision support and modeling of public health -care resources [J ]. Journal of Biomedical Infor- matics, 2007,40:438 - 447.
  • 2Riccardo Bella zziea. Predictive data mining in clinical medicine: Current issues and guidelines[J]. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2008,77 : 81 - 97.
  • 3Kim SY ,Moon SK. Preoperative prediction of advanced prostatic cancer us- ing clinical decision support systems : accuracy comparison between support vector machine and artificial neural network [J]. Korean J Radiol, 2011, 12(5 ) : 588 - 594.
  • 4陈新平.临床医学中的神经网络技术[J].中国现代医学杂志,2003,13(9):46-50. 被引量:4
  • 5u W, Liu T, Valdez R, et al. Application of support vector machine mod- eling for prediction of common diseases: the case of diabetes and pre - dia- betes[J]. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak,2010,10: 16.
  • 6王之龙,高云,唐磊,孙应实,曹崑,张晓鹏.人工神经网络模型基于胃癌生物学行为的MSCT影像信息判断淋巴结转移[J].中国医学影像技术,2011,27(6):1218-1222. 被引量:7
  • 7Zhang XP, Wang ZL, Tang L, et al. Support vector machine model for diag- nosis of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer with multidetector comput- ed tomography : a preliminary study [ J ]. BMC Cancer, 2011,11 : 10.
  • 8Kim W, Kim KS, Lee JE, et al. Development of novel breast cancer recur- rence prediction model using support vector machine [ J ]. J Breast Cancer, 2012,15(2) :230 - 238.
  • 9Furey TS, Cristianini N, Duffy N, et al, Support vector machine classifica- tion and validation of cancer tissue samples using micmarray expression data[J]. Bioinformatics,2000,16(10) :906 - 914.
  • 10华贻军,洪明晃,郭灵,陈秋燕,向燕群,黄培钰.应用人工神经网络方法预测鼻咽癌患者5年生存状态[J].肿瘤学杂志,2006,12(4):300-304. 被引量:7

二级参考文献23

  • 1王晓华,陈卉,马大庆,高培毅,周新华.人工神经网络在孤立性肺结节CT诊断研究中的应用[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(4):377-382. 被引量:21
  • 2崔燕海,张晓鹏,唐磊,孙应实.贲门癌CT检出淋巴结分布的影像学特点[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(4):553-557. 被引量:15
  • 3Tunaci M.Carcinoma of stomach and duodenum:radiologic diagnosis and staging.Eur J Radiol,2002,42(3):181-192.
  • 4Kwee RM,Kwee TC.Imaging in assessing lymph node status in gastric cancer.Gastric Cancer,2009,12(1):6-22.
  • 5Kumano S,Murakami T,Kim T,et al.T staging of gastric cancer:role of multi-detector row CT.Radiology,2005,237(3):961-966.
  • 6Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma-2nd English Edition.Gastric Cancer,1998,1(1):10-24.
  • 7Fang Y,Zhao DB,Zhou JG,et al.Multivariate analysis of risk factors of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer.Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi,2009,12(2):130-132.
  • 8Shen L,Huang Y,Sun M,et al.Clinicopathological features associated with lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer:analysis of a single-institution experience in China.Can J Gastroenterol,2009,23(5):353-356.
  • 9Wu CY,Chen JT,Chen GH,et al.Lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer:a clinicopathological analysis.Hepatogastroenterology,2002,49(47):1465-1468.
  • 10Nasu J,Nishina T,Hirasaki S,et al.Predictive factors of lymph node metastasis in patients with undifferentiated early gastric cancers.J Clin Gastroenterol,2006,40(5):412-415.

共引文献14

同被引文献19

  • 1中风病诊断与疗效评定标准(试行)[J].北京中医药大学学报,1996,19(1):55-56. 被引量:5925
  • 2D'amore C,Paciaroni M, Silvestrelli G,et al. Severity of acute intracerebral haemorrhage,elderly age and atrial fibrillation : Independent predictors of poor outcome at three months[J]. Eur J Intern Med,2013,24(4) :310-313.
  • 3Kourou K,Exarchos TP,Exarchos KP,et al. Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction [J]. Comput Struct Biotechnol J,2015,13:8-17.
  • 4Cheung RT’Zou LY. Use of the original,modified,or new intracerebral hemorrhage score to predict mortality and morbidity after intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. Stroke, 2003,34(7):1717-1722.
  • 5Nilsson J,Ohlsson M,Thulin L,et al. Risk factor identification and mortality prediction in cardiac surgery using artificial neural networks [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2006,132(1):12-19.
  • 6Kim SY,Moon SK,Jung DC’et al. Pre-operative prediction of advanced prostatic cancer using clinical decisionsupport systems : accuracy comparison between support vector machine and artificial neural network [J]. Korean JRadiol,2011,12(5) :588-594.
  • 7Howe A,Escalona OJ’Di Maio R,et al. A support vector machine for predicting defibrillation outcomes from waveform metrics[J]. Resuscitation,2014,85(3) :343-349.
  • 8Kim W,Kim KS,Lee JE,et al. Development of novel breast cancer recurrence prediction model using support vector machine [J]. J Breast Cancer,2012,15 (2) :230-238.
  • 9Cherkassky V. The nature of statistical learning theory [J]. IEEE Trans Neural Netw, 1997,8(6): 1564.
  • 10Yu W,Liu T, Valdez R,et al. Application of support vector machine modeling for prediction of common diseases : the case of diabetes and pre-diabetes [J]. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak,2010,10: 16.

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部