期刊文献+

企业与利益相关者关系的重新定位——基于哈贝马斯对话伦理的研究 被引量:5

Reorientation of the Relationship Between Business and Stakeholder——Based on Habermasian Discourse Ethics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 企业与利益相关者关系的理论分析主要集于工具性视角与规范性视角。工具性视角以经济绩效为追求,由于未更好地嵌入规范的社会理论当中,其目的虽明确但方向却不然。规范性视角以阐明企业经营中利益相关者参与的应然内涵为己任,其超然的独白角色难免冷落的际遇。利益相关者的实践模式亦须超越。藉由对话伦理的分析,为重新定位和探索企业与利益相关者的关系提供了新机遇,无论是对利益相关者理论的理路承接,还是对既有命题的逻辑阐释,都显示较强的逻辑自洽性。进一步,由此构建的对话实现框架,为企业经营实践提供了新参照。这些都为进一步反思当前企业社会责任的若干问题给予了深刻警醒。 Theoretical analysis with business stakeholder mainly centers on instrumental and normative perspective. Although the aim of instrumental perspective which is oriented at economic performance is clear, social direction is not so for not fully embedding itself in normative theory of society. The mission of normative perspective is to discuss stakeholder connota- tions of should however. Transcendental monologue role cannot be avoided of desolated misfortunes for shortage of realistic solicitude. Business is overwhelmed when comes to select practice mode of stakeholder. Analysis on discourse ethics has pro- vided the new opportunity for relocating and exploration of stakeholder connotations. Either tinner logic to stakeholder theory or integration of some informed propositions, the analysis reveals self-consistency. The dialogue construct building further provides theoretic references for business practice. All these present profound and alarming impact on reflection of some problems about corporate social responsibility.
作者 潘奇
出处 《浙江工商大学学报》 2013年第4期57-63,共7页 Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
基金 教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目"转型期企业慈善捐赠的形成机制及实证研究"(12YJC630147)
关键词 利益相关者 对话伦理 企业社会责任 stakeholder discourse ethics corporate social responsibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献37

  • 1周祖城.管理与伦理结合:管理思想的深刻变革[J].南开学报(哲学社会科学版),1999(3):78-85. 被引量:40
  • 2何包钢,陈承新.中国协商民主制度[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,35(3):13-21. 被引量:142
  • 3丹尼尔·贝尔 欧文·克里斯托尔.《经济理论的危机》[M].上海人民出版社,1985年版.第277页.
  • 4休谟 关文运译.《人性论》[M].商务印书馆,1980年版.第625页.
  • 5雷恩.《管理思想的演变》[M].中国社会科学出版社,2000年版..
  • 6.《马克思恩格斯选集》第1卷[M].人民出版社,1995年.第61页.
  • 7.《马克思恩格斯选集》第1卷[M].人民出版社,1972年版.第362页.
  • 8Rawls, John. Political Liberalism[ M ]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
  • 9Bessette, Joseph M. The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and Americam National Government[ M ]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1994.
  • 10Uhr, John. Deliberative Democracy in Australia[ M ]. Melbourne:Cambridge University Press, 1998.

共引文献143

同被引文献121

  • 1凌文辁,陈龙,王登.CPM领导行为评价量表的建构[J].心理学报,1987,19(2):199-207. 被引量:113
  • 2周晓宏,王业球,凌利.基于利益相关者理论的工程项目治理机制研究[J].安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版),2011,28(6):45-46. 被引量:6
  • 3李超平,时勘.变革型领导的结构与测量[J].心理学报,2005,37(6):803-811. 被引量:457
  • 4郭建新.信用:一种经济伦理的诠释维度[J].江苏社会科学,2007(3):208-212. 被引量:7
  • 5MEYER J W, ROWAN B. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony [ J ]. American Journal of Sociology, 1977,83 (2) :340-363.
  • 6KURAN T. The Tenacious Past: Theories of Personal and Collective Conservatism [ J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1988,10 ( 1 ) : 143-171.
  • 7SCOTT W R. Organizations : Rational, Natural, and Open Systems [ M ]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-hall, 1987:77-79.
  • 8POWELL W W. Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis [ M ]//POWELL W W, DIMAGGIO P J. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1991 : 183-203.
  • 9TOST L P. An Integrative Model of Legitimacy Judgments [ J ]. Academy of Management Review,2011,38 (4) :686-710.
  • 10COLYVASJ A,POWELL W W. Roads to Institutionalization:The Remaking of Boundaries between Public and Private Science [ M ]//STAW B. Research in Organizational Behavior:An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press, 2006 : 305-353.

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部