期刊文献+

玻璃纤维桩和铸造金属桩在牙体缺损修复中的疗效比较 被引量:9

The efficacy of glass fiber post and cast metal post in the repair of dental defects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较玻璃纤维桩和铸造金属桩在牙体缺损修复中的疗效。方法选择2011年6月~2012年6月我院口腔科收治的46例牙体缺损患者为研究对象,共80颗牙。将符合本研究纳入标准和排除标准的患者按照牙齿数分为观察组(玻璃纤维桩)和对照组(铸造金属桩)各40颗牙,比较两组治疗的成功率及失败情况。结果观察组患者治疗后的成功率达95.0%,明显高于对照组(75.0%),两组疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组2颗牙出现松动,无一颗牙出现龈缘黑线、根尖折断的情况。对照组4颗牙出现松动,3颗牙出现龈缘黑线,3颗牙出现根尖折断。结论玻璃纤维桩在牙体缺损修复中的疗效优于铸造金属桩,其具有操作简单、成功率高等优点,值得临床推广。 Objective To compare the efficacy of glass fiber post and cast metal post in tooth defect repair.Methods From June 2011 to June 2012 for the study,in my hospital dentistry received 46 cases of patients with dental defects(80 teeth).Would be consistent with the study inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria were divided into observation group(glass fibers piles) and control group(cast metal post) in accordance with the tooth number of 40 teeth each were compared treatment success rate and failure.Results Observation group patients after treatment success rate of 95.0%,was significantly higher than the success rate(75.0%),difference was statistically significant between two groups(P〈0.05),the observation group 2 teeth to loosen,without a black line of apical broken teeth appear gingival margin.Con trol group 4 teeth loose teeth gingival margin black line teeth apical broken.Conclusion The efficacy of the glass fiber post in the tooth defect repair is better than cast metal post,its simple operation,high success rate,etc.,worthy of promotion.
作者 卢晓杰
出处 《中国现代医生》 2013年第10期133-134,共2页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 玻璃纤维桩 铸造金属桩 牙体缺损修复 成功率 Glass fiber post Cast metal post Tooth defect repair Success rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献35

共引文献70

同被引文献95

  • 1沈玺,高雅男,徐政.硅烷偶联剂的研究与应用[J].上海生物医学工程,2006,27(1):14-17. 被引量:57
  • 2袁元.直接粘结颊面管与带环颊面管在直丝弓矫治技术中的对比研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2007,23(4):231-232. 被引量:15
  • 3施存山,刘建,刘延峰.口腔修复中不同材料摩擦性能的比较分析[J].中国美容医学,2011,20(z4):168.
  • 4Duret B,Reynaud M, Duret F. Un nouveau concept de re-constitution corono - radiculaire : Le Composipost ( 1 )[J]. Le Chirurgien - Dentiste de France,1990,60: 131 -141.
  • 5Radovic I, Monticelli F,Goracci C, et al. The effect ofsandblasting on adhesion of a dual - cured resin compositeto methacrylic fiber posts : microtensile bond strength andSEM evaluation [ J]. J Dent, 2007,35 (6) :496 -502.
  • 6Mosharraf R, Ranjbarian P. Effects of post surface condi-tioning before silanization on bond strength between fiberpost and resin cement [J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2013,5(2):126-132.
  • 7Pereira JR, Lins do Valle A, Ghizoni JS,et al. Push - outbond strengths of different dental cements used to cementglass fiber posts [ J ]. J Prosthet Dent, 2013 , 110 ( 2 ):134-140.
  • 8Arslan H, Barutcigil C, Yilmaz CB,et al. Push - out bondstrength between composite core build up and fiber - rein-forced posts after different surface treatments [ J ]. Pho-tomed Laser Surg, 2013,31(7) :328 -333.
  • 9Mohsen CA. Evaluation of push - out bond strength of sur-face treatments of two esthetic posts [ J] . Indian J DentRes, 2012,23(5) :596 -602.
  • 10Chen ML, Ding JF, He YJ,et al. Effect of pretreatment onEr: YAG laser - irradiated dentin [EB/OL] ‘ [2013 -08 -16]. http://www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pubmed/23948945.

引证文献9

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部