期刊文献+

痰涂阳性肺结核患者密切接触者结核菌感染情况调查 被引量:8

Investigation of contacts of persons with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的应用早期建立的结核分枝杆菌特异性IFN-γ酶联免疫斑点(Elispot)检测技术,以及结核菌素皮肤试验评价痰涂阳性肺结核患者密切接触者中结核菌的感染情况。方法采用Elispot技术检测1 242例痰涂阳性肺结核患者的密切接触者进行外周血结核菌特异性IFN-γ水平,同时平行进行PPD皮试。结果Elispot在密切接触者以及接触者中家属,朋友的阳性率分别是30%,34.25%和22.1%,PPD相应的结果是13.2%,15.57%和8.9%;两者阳性率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。Elisopt阳性率在不同年龄组均高于PPD,结果差异均有统计学意义。在47例确诊肺结核患者(发病率达3.78%)中,其中Elispot阳性34例(72.34%),PPD强阳性12例(25.53%);两者阳性率有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论与PPD比较利用Elispot诊断结核潜伏感染有较高辅助诊断价值。利用Elispot监测结核密切接触者,有利于早期发现结核病人。 Objective To survey the infectious status of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in close contacts with smearpositive tuberculosis patients through the early establishment of mycobacterium tuberculosis specificity IFN-γenzyme-linked immune spot(Elispot) detection technology and tuberculin skin test(TST).Methods The IFN-γlevels of 1 242 samples of close contacts with smear-positive tuberculosis patients were detected by using Elispot and PPD skin tests in parallel at the same time.Results The positive rates of Elispot in close contacts as well as their family members and friends were 30%,34.25% and 22.1%,respectively,where the corresponding results of PPD were 13.2%,15.57% and 8.9%;The positive rates of both were statistically significant.Elisopt positive rates in different age groups were higher than PPD,and the results were statistically significant(P0.01).In 47 confirmed TB patients(with incidence of 3.78%),there were 34 cases of positive Elispot(72.34%) and 12 cases of PPD strong positive(25.53%);The positive rates of both were statistically significant(P0.01).Conclusions Compared with PPD,Elispot is of higher value in diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection and thus it is suitable for early detection of tuberculosis cases.
出处 《中国热带医学》 CAS 2013年第6期684-686,共3页 China Tropical Medicine
基金 国家自然基金项目(No.81172732)(No.81171535)
关键词 Γ干扰素 酶联免疫斑点 结核菌素皮肤试验 结核菌感染 Interferon-γ Elispot PPD Tuberculous infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Drobniewski FA, Caws M, Gibson A, Young D. Modern laboratory diag- nosis of tuberculosis [J]. Lancet Infection Dis, 2003, 3(3): 141-147.
  • 2Lalvani A, Diagnosing tuberculosis infection in the 21th century: new tools to rathe an old enemy[J]. Chest. 2007,131 (6):1898-1906.
  • 3Xinchun Chen, Qianting :ang, Mingxia Zhang, et al. Diagnosis of Ac- tive Tuberculosis in China Using an In-House Gamma Interferon En- zyme-Linked Immunospot Assay[J]. Clin Vaccine Immunol, 2009,16 (16): 879-884.
  • 4Chen XC, Liao MF, Zhu XY,et al.Tuberculosis bacterium specificity of IFN - gamma Elispot test in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis and tu- berculosis infection [J]. J Tubercul Defense, 2010, 32 (I 1) : 747-751 (In Chinese).
  • 5Tu DH. Tuberculin experiment application [J]. Chin J Antitubercul, 2001,23(2)123-125(In Chinese).
  • 6Lalvani A , Pathan AA , Durkan H , et al. Enhanced contact tracing and spatial tracking of Mycobaeterium tuberculosis infection by enu- meration of antigen-specific T cells[J] . Lancet , 2001 , 357(9273) : 2017-2021.
  • 7X.ie MF, Zhong SC, Zhong YZ. New registration smear tuberculosis pa- tients family closely contacted screening analysis [J].China Trop Med, 2008, 7 (4) : 619-620(Lq Chinese).
  • 8Lin DW, Lan J, Lebanon and shape. The smear-positive pulmonary tu- berculosis patients family contacts of disease research [J]. China Gen- eral Med, 2010, 13 (1 e) : 313-315(In Chinese).

同被引文献89

引证文献8

二级引证文献203

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部