期刊文献+

不同缝合方式对前列腺癌根治术后膀胱尿道吻合口狭窄发生率的影响 被引量:1

The influence of different suture techniques to the anastomotic stricture incidence rate after radical prostatectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评估在前列腺癌根治术中,以间断或连续缝合等2种不同的方法处理尿道膀胱吻合口后,远期尿道狭窄发生率的情况。方法:在2006~2010年间,国内3个临床中心共进行了549例开放或腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术。其中388例以间断缝合的方法处理膀胱尿道吻合口,161例以连续缝合的方法处理尿道膀胱吻合口,并评估术后吻合口狭窄发生率的情况。结果:45例(8.2%)患者出现术后尿道吻合口狭窄,发生的平均时间为术后4.1个月。在以间断缝合法处理吻合口的388例开放前列腺癌根治术患者中,10.1%(39例)的患者出现尿道狭窄;而在以连续吻合法处理的161例患者中,尿道狭窄发生率为3.7%(6例),其中75例开放前列腺癌根治术后发生率为2.7%(2例),86例腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术患者术后发生率为4.7%(4例)。结论:无论是以开放的或腹腔镜途径,用连续缝合法处理前列腺癌根治术中的尿道膀胱吻合口,术后吻合口狭窄的发生率低于间断缝合法。 Objective: To analyze the incidence of anastomosis stricture after radical prostatectomy with two different anastomotic methods, interrupted or running suture. Method: A retrospective analysis was performed for 549 patients with prostate carcinoma who underwent RRP or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(LRP) between 2006 and 2010 in 3 Asian institutions. Interrupted (n = 338) and running (n = 161 ) suture were used for anasto- mosis. Postoperative anastomotic stricture incidence were compared. Result : AS developed in 45 patients (8.2 %) after a median time of 4.1 months of operation. The incidence of AS is 10.1 % (39 cases) when the vesicourethral anastomosis was performed with routine six interrupted sutures in 388 RRP patients. When the running sutures was adopted including 75 of RRP and 86 LRP cases, the incidence of AS decreased to 3.7% (6 cases) , 2 and 4 patients, respectively. Conclusion: According to our experiences, vesicourethral anastomosis be performed by running sutures whatever in RRP or LRP has a lower AS incidence than routine six interrupted sutures.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2013年第7期517-519,共3页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 前列腺癌根治术 吻合口狭窄 并发症 radical prostatectomy anastomotic stricture complication
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Popken G, Sommerkamp H, Schultze Seemann W, et al. anastomotic stricture after radical prostatectomy. incidence, findings and treatment[J]. Eur Urol, 1998, 33: 382-386.
  • 2Besarani D, Amoroso P, Kirby R. Bladder neck con-tracture after radical retropubic prostatectomy[J]. BJU Int, 2004,94: 1245 -1247.
  • 3Augustin I-l, Pummer K, Daghofer F, et al. Patient selreporting questionnaire on urological morbidity and bother after radical retropubic prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2002, 42: 112-117.
  • 4Walsh P C. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgicaltechnique[J]. J Urol , 1998, 160:2418 -2424.
  • 5Walsh P C, Mostwin J L. Radical prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy with preservation of potency. Re- suits using a new nerve-sparing technique [J]. Br J Urol, 1984, 56: 694-697.
  • 6Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique[J]. J Urol, 2000, 163: 1643-1649.
  • 7Surya B V, Provet J, Johanson K E, et al. Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: risk factors and management[J]. J Urol, 1990, 143: 755-758.
  • 8Williams S B, Alemozaffar M, Lei Y, et al. Random- ized controlled trial of BarBed pol.yglyconate versus polyglactin suture for robot-assisted laparoscopic pros- "tatectomy anastomosis: technique and outcomes [J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58: 875-881.
  • 9Borboroglu P G, Sands J P, Roberts J L, et al. Riskfactors for vesicourethral anastomotic stricture after radical prostatectomy[J]. Urology, 2000, 56: 96- 100.
  • 10Soloway M S, Neulander E. Bladdeneck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy[J]. Semin Urol ()neol, 2000, 18: 51-56.

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部