期刊文献+

胆管癌患者血清、胆汁中的CA19—9水平ROC曲线分析及临床参考价值评估 被引量:1

Diagnostic and optimum reference value of serum and bile CA19-9 in cholangiocarcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨血清、胆汁CA19—9水平对胆管癌的早期诊断和鉴别诊断的价值。方法对82例胆道恶性病变患者和85例胆道良性疾病者测定血清和胆汁的CA19—9水平,进行对比分析和评价。结果恶性组患者血清、胆汁CA19—9水平均明显高于良性组患者(P〈0.001);胆汁CA19-9诊断胆管癌的ROC曲线下面积为0.764,诊断价值高于血清的0.701;根据诊断评价指标,胆汁CA19—9灵敏度、特异度、符合率、阳性预测值和阴性预测值(57.90%、95.50%、77.25%、92.30%、70.43%)均高于血液CA19—9(50.90%,89.10%,70.66%,82.35%,65.62%),两项联合检测灵敏度、符合率及阴性预测值均有不同程度提高。结论选择血清、胆汁CA19-9进行联合检测,在胆管癌的早期筛检中具有重要参考价值。 Objective To evaluate the value of the levels of CA19-9 in the serum and bile for diag-nosis of diseases of billiary system. Methods Concentration of serum and bile CA19-9 was determined in 82 patients with cbolangiocarcinoma and 85 patients with benign disease, and the results were being analyzed and evaluated by statistics. Results The level of serum and bile CA19-9 in diseases of cholangiocarcinoma was higher than benign disease (P 〈 0. 001 ) , and the diagnostic value of bile CA19-9 was higher than serum CA19-9 with ROC. In accordance with evaluation indicators, the sensitivity, specificity, coincidence rate, positive predictive rate and negative predictive rate of bile CA19-9 were all higher than serum. And the sen-sitivity, coincidence rate and negative predictive rate were enhanced after combined measurement of serum and bile CA19-9. Conclusion The way of combined measurement of serum and bile CA19-9 is an important reference in early screening cholangiocarcinoma.
出处 《中华消化内镜杂志》 2013年第7期369-371,共3页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
基金 甘肃省科技计划项目(0805TCYA040)
关键词 胆管癌 血清 胆汁 CA19—9 诊断 Cholangiocarcinoma Serum Bile CA19-9 Diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献11

  • 1李红敏,洪锡田,许青霞.385例肿瘤标志物糖类抗原CA19-9检测结果分析[J].中国热带医学,2006,6(2):290-290. 被引量:2
  • 2廖峰,陈映霞,何泽明,秦叔逵,钱军,王广贤.糖类抗原CA72-4、CA19-9在胃癌诊断中的应用价值[J].放射免疫学杂志,2007,20(1):28-30. 被引量:15
  • 3Stavropoulous S, Larghi A, Verna E, et al. Intraductal ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with biliary strictures and no abodominal mass on computed tomography. Endoscopy, 2005,37:715-721.
  • 4Tamada K, Kanai N, Wada S, et al. Utility and limitation of intraductal uhrasonography in distinguishing longitudinal cancer extension along the bile duct from inflammatory wall thickening. Abdom Imaging, 2001,26:623-631.
  • 5Tamada K,Ueno N, Tomiyama T, et al. Characterization of billiary strictures using intraductal ultrasonography: comparision with percutaneous cholangioscopic biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc, 1998,47:341-349.
  • 6Singh saluja S, Sharma R, Pal S, et al. Differentiation between benign and malignant hilar obstructions using laboratory and radiological investigations : A prospective study. HPB ( Oxford ), 2007, 9 : 373-382.
  • 7Akdogan M, Parlak E, Kayhan B, et al. Are serum and biliary carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 determinations reliable for differentiation between benign and malignant biliary disease? Turk J Gastroenterul, 2003,14:181-184.
  • 8Mann DV, Edwards R, Ho S, et al. Elevated tumour marker CA19-9 : clinical inlerprelation and influence of obstructive jaundice. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2000,26:474-479.
  • 9Rogoveanu I, Gheonea DI, Saftoiu A, et al. The role of imaging methds in identifying the causes of extrahepatic cholestasis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 2006, 15:265-271.
  • 10金杰,丁文彬,袁瑞凡,钱俊波.经皮胆管内超声诊断阻塞性黄疸的临床价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2007,15(6):449-451. 被引量:5

共引文献143

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部