期刊文献+

玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗与光动力疗法联合玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗治疗特发性脉络膜新生血管的疗效比较 被引量:25

Intravitreal ranibizumab injection combined with or without photodynamic therapy for idiopathic choroidal neovascularization., a comparative efficacy study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较单纯玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗(ranibizumab。商品名I。ucentis)与光动力疗法(PDT)联合玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗治疗特发性脉络膜新生血管(ICNV)的临床疗效及安全性。方法随机对照临床前瞻性研究。经最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、全视网膜镜眼底检查、眼底血管造影及光相干断层扫描(OCT)检查确诊的ICNV患者27例27只眼纳入研究。采用随机数表对患者随机分为2组。其中,单纯玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗组(单纯药物注射治疗组)13例13只眼;PDT治疗1周后玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗组(联合治疗组)14例14只跟。单纯药物注射治疗组行玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗0.5mg;联合治疗组参照PDT治疗老年性黄斑变性研究制定的标准先行PDT治疗,1周后行玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗0.5mg。治疗后1、2、3、6、12个月,采用治疗前相同的设备和方法检查BCVA、脉络膜新生血管(CNV)渗漏以及视网膜厚度的变化。其中,BCVA转换为最小分辨角对数(IogMAR)视力。CNV未完全闭合仍有渗漏者,则再次行玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗治疗。2次玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗治疗之间的最短间隔时间为1个月。结果2组患者治疗后视力较治疗前均有明显提高。治疗后12个月,单纯药物注射治疗组患者平均logMAR视力为0.22±0.11,联合治疗组患者平均IogMAR视力为0.21±0.12;2组患者平均logMAR视力比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.187,P=0.853)。眼底血管造影检查结果显示,单纯药物注射治疗组患者中10例CNV完全闭合,占77.92%;3例CNV部分闭合,轻微荧光渗漏,占23.08%。联合治疗组患者中12例CNV完全闭合,占85.71%;2例CNV部分闭合,轻微荧光渗漏,占14.29%。OCT检查结果显示,2组患者治疗后CNV强反射区域缩小,视网膜下积液吸收,黄斑区视网膜厚度下降。单纯药物注射治疗组患者黄斑区平均视网膜厚度为(167.96±10.69)μm,联合治疗组患者黄斑区平均视网膜厚度为(171.64±11.30)μm;2组患者平均视网膜厚度比较,差异无统计学意义(t=-0.887,P=0.389)。单纯药物注射治疗组患者接受玻璃体腔注射的平均次数为(2.4±1.0)次;联合治疗组患者接受玻璃体腔注射的平均次数为(1.5±0.7)次。两组患者接受玻璃体腔注射的平均次数比较,差异有统计学意义(t=2.821,P=0.009)。治疗及随访过程中,单纯药物注射治疗组患者中1例出现结膜下出血,其余患者未发现其他眼部及全身不良反应。结论单纯玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗或PDT联合玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗均能减轻CNV渗漏,降低视网膜厚度,改善ICNV患者视力,无严重的眼部和全身不良反应。PDT联合玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗治疗可减少玻璃体腔注射的次数。 Objective To compare the clinic therapeutic effect of intravitreal ranibizumab injection versus photodynamic therapy (PDT) combined with intravitreal ranibizumab injection for idiopathic choroidal neovascularizatio (ICNV), and to investigate the clinical effect and safety of treatment. Methods A randomized controlled clinical prospective study was performed for 27 patients (27 eyes) diagnosed as ICNV. Fourteen patients were assigned to receive PDT and intravitreal ranibizumab injection (combinationgroup, n = 14); the control group was treated with only intravitreal ranibizumab injection (single group, n= 13). The combination group was treated with an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 ml) 1 week after PDT. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (logMAR), examination of the ocular fundus, fluorescence fundus angiography (FFA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed respectively at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. If ehoroidal neovascularization (CNV) was only partially regressed or the leakage went on during follow-up, those patients were re injected with ranibizumab. Results After 12 months, the average vision is 0.22±0.11 in single group, and 0.21 ±0.12 in combination group, and the differences were not significant (t=0. 187, P=0. 853). In single group FFA and ICGA showed completely closed CNV in 10 eyes (77.92%), and almost closed CNV in 3 eyes (23.08%) with obvious reduction of fluorescence leakage. In combination group FFA and ICGA showed completely closed CNV in 12 eyes (85.. 71%), and almost closed CNV in 2 eyes (14.29%) with obvious reduction of fluorescence leakage; OCT showed the subretinal fluid absorption and reduction of CNV. The average macular retinal thickness (MRT) in single groups is (167.96±10.69) m, and in combination groups is (171.64±11.30) m. In single and combination groups MRT decreased significantly at the final follow up, but no significant differences in both groups (t= -0. 887, P=0. 389). The average number of intravitreal injection was (1.5±0.7) in combination group and (2.4±1.0) in single group (t= 2. 821, P= 0. 009). There were no ocular or systemic adverse events observed except for one patient with subconjunctival hemorrhage in the single group. Conclusions Intravitreal ranihizumab injection and PDT combined with intravitreal bevacizumab injection are both effective and safe for the patients with ICNV. The combined therapy can induce CNV regression, fundus hemorrhage and exudation absorption more effectively, and have less recurred CNV and side effects.
出处 《中华眼底病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期362-366,共5页 Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases
关键词 脉络膜新生血管化 药物疗法 光化学疗法 抗体 单克隆 治疗应用 疗效比较研究 Choroidal neovascularization/drug therapy Photochemotherapy Antibodies, monoclonal/therapeutic use Comparative effectiveness research
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1廖菊生.中心性渗出性脉络膜视网膜病变[A].李凤鸣 主编.眼科全书[C].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.2271—2272.
  • 2张美霞,严密,唐健,张军军,韦纯义,孟丹.光动力疗法治疗中心性渗出性脉络膜视网膜病变疗效观察[J].中华眼底病杂志,2007,23(1):17-20. 被引量:26
  • 3Chan WM, Lain DS, Wong TH, et al. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for subtoveal idiopathic choroidal neovascularization: one-year results from a prospective case series. Ophthalmology, 2003,110 : 2395-2402.
  • 4Carneiro AM, Silva RM, Veludo MJ, et al. Ranibizumab treatment for choroidal neovascularization from causes other than age-related macular degeneration and pathological myopia. Ophthalmologica, 2011,225 : 81 88.
  • 5Pedersen R, Soliman W, Lund-Andersen H, et al. Treatment of choroidal neovascularization using intravitreal bevacizumab. Aeta Ophthalmol Scand, 2007,85 : 526-533.
  • 6岳枚,戴虹,喻晓兵,杨絮,龙力.玻璃体腔注射抗血管内皮生长因子单克隆抗体ranibizumab治疗特发性脉络膜新生血管的临床观察[J].中华眼底病杂志,2011,27(6):510-514. 被引量:16
  • 7Kang HM, Koh HJ. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy versus photodynamic therapy for idiopathic ehoroidal neovaseularization. Am J Ophthalmol, 2013,155 : 713-719.
  • 8Busch T. Approaches toward combining photodynamic therapy with pharmaceuticals that alter vascular microenvironment. Retina, 2009,29-36 38.
  • 9张承芬,陈有信.中心性渗出性脉络膜视网膜病变//张承芬.眼底病学.2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:429-432.
  • 10徐建锋,王雨生.特发性脉络膜新生血管//王雨生.脉络膜新生血管性疾病.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:495-503.

二级参考文献40

  • 1张美霞,陆方,严密,张军军,孟丹,杜彩凤,沈齐,王顺清,廖晋英.光动力疗法治疗渗出型老年性黄斑变性四年临床观察总结[J].中华眼底病杂志,2004,20(5):275-279. 被引量:53
  • 2沈洁,王竞.光动力学治疗脉络膜新生血管的临床观察[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2005,23(9):925-928. 被引量:8
  • 3张美霞,严密,唐健,张军军,韦纯义,孟丹.光动力疗法治疗中心性渗出性脉络膜视网膜病变疗效观察[J].中华眼底病杂志,2007,23(1):17-20. 被引量:26
  • 4Fukuchi T, Takahashi K, Ida H, et al. Staging of idiopathic choroidal neovaseulization by optieal coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2001,239:24-29.
  • 5Campochiaro PA. Retinal and choroidal neovascularization. J Cell Physiol, 2000, 184:301-310.
  • 6Witmer AN, Vrensen GF, Van Noorden CJ, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factors and angiogenesis in eye disease. Prog Retin Eye Res, 2003,22:1-29.
  • 7Chan WM, Lam DS, Wong TH, et al. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for subfoveal idiopathic ehoroidal neovaseularization: one-year results from a prospective case series. Ophthalmology, 2003,110:2395-402.
  • 8Postelmans L, Pasteels B, Coquelet P, et al. Severe pigment epithelial alterations in the treatment area following photodynamic therapy for classic choroidal neovascularization in young females. Am J Ophthalmol, 2004,138 : 803-808.
  • 9Weinberger D,Ron Y, Lusky M, et al. Competitive quenching: a possible novel approach in protecting RPE cells from damage during PDT. Curt Eye Res, 2005, 30: 269-277.
  • 10Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med, 2006,355 : 1419-1431.

共引文献45

同被引文献253

引证文献25

二级引证文献129

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部