期刊文献+

不同方法提取和测定粪肠球菌生物膜总蛋白含量的比较 被引量:1

The Comparison of Different Methods on Extracting and Measuring the Total Protein of Biofilms Formed by Enterococcus faecalis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:以标准菌株ATCC33186为例,用超声破碎法提取粪肠球菌生物膜中总蛋白,结合3种不同方法测定总蛋白的含量,确定一种简单快速有效的检测细菌生物膜中总蛋白含量的方法。方法:将培养24h的生物膜加入PBS缓冲液清洗后,使用超声破碎法提取生物膜中总蛋白,选择作用时间、振幅Amp、超声和间隔时间等参数进行超声破碎,结合SDS-PAGE凝胶电泳分析蛋白电泳图谱确定最佳超声条件后,确定最佳超声条件后,使用BCA法、考马斯亮蓝Bradford法和Lowry法测定生物膜中总蛋白含量,对结果进行比较分析。结果:最佳超声破碎条件参数:作用时间2min,振幅Amp20%,超声2s间隔2s。用BCA法测得总蛋白含量每皿为2299.1μg,考马斯亮蓝Bradford法测得含量为每皿3793.8μg,Lowry法测定含量为每皿1858.0μg。结论:确定超声破碎提取粪肠球菌生物膜蛋白的最优化条件,是一种简单可行测定细菌生物膜中总蛋白含量的方法。 Objective: In order to measure the total protein of bacterial biofilm formed by Enterococcus faecalis ATCC33186,ultrasonication was used to extract the protein.After optimizing ultrasonic extraction conditions by different parameters,three methods commonly used to determine the protein concentration were taken.And we tried to confirm an accurate,rapid and simply method for quantifying protein in the biofilm.Methods: Ultrasonication was used to extract the protein from biofilm which was washed by PBS buffer after culturing 24 h.In order to determine the optimum ultrasonication condition,we chose different parameters as times,amplitudes,ultrasonic and interval times.After choosing the best ultrasonic treatment combined with SDS-PAGE electrophoresis,BCA,Bradford and Lowry methods were used to determine the total protein of biofilms.And we compared the data discrepancy of different methods.Results: The optimum condition of ultrasonication was ultrasonic time 2 min,Amp 20% and ultrasonic treatment for 2 s with interval of 2 s.The average concentration of total protein concentration of three times was 2299.1μg/dish by BCA,3793.8 μg/dish by Bradford,1858.0 μg/dish by Lowry.Conclusion: The optimum ultrasonic condition for protein extraction from Enterococcus faecalis biofilm was determined.The Bradford method was feasible and precise to determine the total protein concentration of bacterial biofilm.
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS CSCD 2013年第7期597-600,共4页 Journal of Oral Science Research
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50578020) 国家自然科学基金(81000427) 上海高校选拔培养优秀青年教师科研专项基金(jdy-07060) 上海口腔医学研究所院级基金(2011-03)
关键词 粪肠球菌 生物膜 超声 蛋白 Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Ultrasonication Protein
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Siqueira JF,Rog as IN. Clinical implications and microbiologyof bacterial persistence after treatment procedures [J].JEndod,2008,34 (11):1291-1301.
  • 2Nair PN. On the causes of persistentapical periodontitis:a re-view [J].Int Endod,2006,39(4):249-281.
  • 3谷苗,陈兴兴,林媛,田宇,高阳,余擎.几种根管冲洗液组合对粪肠球菌感染根管体外抗菌研究[J].口腔医学研究,2009,25(4):462-465. 被引量:8
  • 4Saber Sel-D,El-Hady SA. Development of an intracanalmature Enterococcus faecalis biofilm and its susceptibility tosome antimicrobial intracanal medications; an in vitro study[J].Eur J Dent,2012,6(1):43-50.
  • 5何永红,田晓蓓,万呼春,温艳丽,张菲菲,马琴睿.变异链球菌蛋白质提取方法研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2009,27(1):100-103. 被引量:7
  • 6Jambrak AR,Mason TJ,Lelas V,et al. Effect of ultrasoundtreatment on solubility and foaming properties of whey proteinsuspensions [J].J Food Eng,2008,86(2):281-287.

二级参考文献23

  • 1袁道强,王丹丹.超声波法提取小麦胚芽蛋白的研究[J].食品研究与开发,2007,28(3):1-4. 被引量:22
  • 2Rathsam C, Eaton RE, Simpson CL, et al. Two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoretic analysis of Streptococcus mutans biofilms[J]. J Proteome Res, 2005, 4(6) : 2161-2173.
  • 3Luppens SB, ten Cate JM. Effect of biofilm model, mode of growth, and strain on streptococcusmutans protein expression as determined by two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis[J]. J Proteome Res, 2005, 4(2):232-237.
  • 4Len AC, Harry DW, Jacques NA. Stress-responsive proteins are upregulated in Streptococcus mutans during acid tolerance [J]. Microbiology, 2004, 150(Pt5) : 1339-1351.
  • 5Welin J, Wilkins JC, Beighton D, et al. Effect of acid shock on protein expression by biofilm cells of Streptococcus mutans[J]. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2003, 227 (2):287-293.
  • 6Len AC, Cordwell SJ, Harry DW, et al. Cellular and extracellular proteome analysis of Streptococcus mutans grown in a chemostat [J]. Proteomics, 2003, 3 (5) : 627-646.
  • 7Gorg A, Weiss W, Dunn MJ. Current two-dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics[J]. Proteomics, 2004, 4 (12): 3665-3685.
  • 8Lopez JL. Two-dimensional electrophoresis in proteome expression analysis [J]. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 2007, 849 (1/2) : 190-202.
  • 9Bodzon-Kulakowska A, Bierczynska-Krzysik A, Dylag T, et al. Methods for samples preparation in proteomic research[J]. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 2007, 849 (1/2): 1- 31.
  • 10Jazwinski SM. Preparation of extracts from yeast[J]. Methods Enzymol, 1990, 182:154-174.

共引文献13

同被引文献59

  • 1李京宝,韩峰,于文功.细菌生物膜研究技术[J].微生物学报,2007,47(3):558-561. 被引量:53
  • 2Costerton J W, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, et al.. Microbial biofilms [J]. Ann. Rev. Microbiol., 1995, 49 ( 2) : 711-745.
  • 3Flemming H C, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix [J]. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 2010, 8(9): 623-633.
  • 4Li X, Yan Z, Xu J. Quantitative variation of biofilms among strains in natural populations of Candida albicans [J] . Microbiology, 2003, 149: 353-362.
  • 5Chrisrensen G D, Simpson W A, Younger J J, et al .. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. [J]. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1985,22(6): 996-1006.
  • 6Peeters E, Nelis H J, Coenye T. Comparison of multiple methods for quantification of microbial biofilms grown in microtiter plates [J] . J. Microbiol. Meth., 2008, 72( 2): 157 -165.
  • 7Monteiro DR, Takamiya AS, Feresin L P, et al .. Susceptibility of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata biofilms to silver nanoparticles in intermediate and mature development phases[J]. J. Prosthodont. Res., 2015, 59( 1): 42-48.
  • 8Patterson J L, Stull-Lane A, Girerd PH, et al .. Analysis of adherence, biofilm formation and cytotoxicity suggests a greater virulence potential of Gardnerella vaginalis relative to other bacterial-vaginosis-associated anaerobes [J]. Microbiology, 2010, 156:392-399.
  • 9Ansari M A, Khan H M, Khan A A, et al .. Anti-biofilm efficacy of silver nanoparticles against MRSA and MRSE isolated from wounds in a tertiary care hospital [J]. Indian. J. Med. Microbi., 2015, 33( 1): 101-109.
  • 10Graba M, Sauvage S, Moulin F Y, et al.. Interaction between local hydrodynamics and algal community in epilithic biofilm [J]. Water Res., 2013, 47(7): 2153-2163.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部