期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹胰体尾切除术疗效比较的Meta分析 被引量:5

Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic disease: a meta analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的用Meta分析方法,系统评价腹腔镜胰体尾切除(LDP)与开腹胰体尾切除术(ODP)的疗效。方法计算机检索Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBase等数据库,查找2006年1月至2012年12月发表的有关对比分析LDP与ODP疗效的随机对照试验文献。按照纳入与排除标准选择文献、提取资料、评价质量后,采用RevMan5.0软件进行Meta分析。结果共有14篇研究纳入分析,包括1417例患者,其中LDP组520例,ODP组897例。分析显示:手术时间、保脾率LDP组大于ODP组,差异有统计学意义[(均数差-273.10,95%CI-354.39~-191.81,P〈0.01)、(OR2.42,95%CI1.78~3.30,P%0.01)];术中失血量、禁食时间、住院时间LDP组小于ODP组,差异有统计学意义[(均数差-273.10,95%CI-354.39~-191.81,P〈0.01);(均数差-1.78,95%CI-2.36~-1.20,P〈0.01);(均数差-3.15,95%CI-3.97~-2.33,P〈0.01)];输血率、胰瘘发生率、死亡率两组差异无统计学意义。结论LDP安全可行。与常规开腹手术相比虽然LDP手术时间较长,但在保留脾脏、减少失血量、缩短禁食时间及住院时间方面具有优势。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic (LDP) versus open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) using meta-analysis. Methods Comprehensive literature search was conducted on articles only in English published from 2006 to 2012 on MEDLINE, EMbase, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials to compare LDP with ODP for Pancreatic disease. Data were ex- tracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. The quality of the included trials was evalua- ted. Meta-analyses were conducted using the Cochrane CollaborationPs RevMan 5.1 software. Results Fourteen controlled clinical trials (n= 1417) were included. The LDP group was significantly longer than the ODP group in operation time, and was significantly larger in the number of patients with spleen preservation [(MD-273. 10, 95% CI -354.39 --191. 081, P〈0.01), (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.78-3.30, P〈0.01) respectively]. The LDP group was significantly less than the ODP group in in- traoperative blood loss, time to oral intake, and length of hospital stay [(MD-- 273.10, 95% CI --354.39---191.81, P〈0.01), (MD--1.78, 95% CI --2.36---1.20, P〈0.01), (MD--3.15, 95% CI -- 3.97-- 2.33, P〈0.01) respectively]. There were no significant differences in blood transfusion, pancreatic fistula rate, and mortality between the two groups. Conclusions LDP is feasi- ble and safe in treating pancreatic disease. When compared with ODP, LDP has the advantages of hav ing less intraoperative blood loss, quicker recovery and more patients with spleen preservation.
出处 《中华肝胆外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第7期507-512,共6页 Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81172082)
关键词 胰腺切除术 胰腺瘘 META分析 Pancreatectomy Pancreatic fistula Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Nakamura M, Ueda J, Kohno H, et al. Prolonged peri-firing compression with a linear stapler prevents pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy[J]. Surg Endosc , 2011,25: 867-871.
  • 2Ziegler KM, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, et aL Pancreatic surgery, evolution at a high-volume center[J]. Surgery, 2010,148,702-709.
  • 3Edwin B, Mala T, Mathisen O, et al. Laparoscopic resection of the pancreas, a feasibility study of the short-term outcome [J]. Surg Endosc , 2004,18:407-411.
  • 4Nau P, Melvin WS, Narula VK, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic conservation: an operation without increased morbidity[J]. Gastroenterol Res Pract , 2009,2009: 846340.
  • 5Velanovich V. Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2006,10: 95-98.
  • 6Teh SH, Tseng D, Sheppard BC. Laparoscopic and open distal pancreatic resection for benign pancreatic disease [J]. J Gastrointest Surg , 2007,11: 1120-1125.
  • 7Kim SC, Park KT, Hwang JW, et al. Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection at a single institution[J]. Surg Endosc , 2008,22:2261-2268.
  • 8Matsumoto T, Shibata K, Ohta M, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy: a nonrandomized comparative study [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2008,18: 340-343.
  • 9Kooby DA, Gillespie T, Bentrem D, et al. Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches[J]. Ann Surg, 2008, 248: 438-446.
  • 10Baker MS, Bentrem DJ, Ujiki MB, et al. A prospective single institution comparison of peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy[J]. Surgery, 2009,146: 635-643.

二级参考文献29

共引文献28

同被引文献30

  • 1Theodoros E Pavlidis,Efstathios T Pavlidis,Athanasios K Sakantamis.Current opinion on lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer surgery[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2011,10(1):21-25. 被引量:12
  • 2刘骞,王成峰,赵平,赵东兵,郭春光,谢亦斌,曲辉.保脾术式对胰体尾癌患者细胞免疫功能及预后的影响[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(10):989-991. 被引量:20
  • 3Kimura W,Inoue T,Futakawa N,et al.Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein[J].Surgery,1996,120 (5):885-890.
  • 4Warshaw AL.Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy[J].Arch Surg,1988,123(5):550-553.
  • 5Hwang HK,Chung YE,Kim KA,et al.Revisiting vascular paten-cy after spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels[J].Surg Endosc,2012,26 (6):1765-1771.
  • 6Lennon AM,Newman N,Makary MA,et al.EUS-guided tattooing before laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection (with video)[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2010,72 (5):1089-1094.
  • 7Borja-Cacho D, A1-Refaie WB, Vickers SM, et a1. Laparoscopic distal Pancreatectomy [J]. Am Coll Surg, 2009, 209(6): 758-765.
  • 8Kooby DA, Chu CK. Laparoscopic management of pancreatic malignancies [J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2010, 90(2): 427-446.
  • 9Kooby DA, Hawkins WG, Schmidt CM, et a1. A multicenter analysis of distal panereateetomy for adenoeareinoma: is laparoscopie resection appropriate [J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2010, 210(5):779-785, 786-787.
  • 10Kimura W,Inoue T, Futakawa N, et al. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein [J]. Surgery, 1996,120(5) :885-890.

引证文献5

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部