期刊文献+

降钙素原变化率在重症细菌性肺炎疗效评估中的作用 被引量:13

The role of change of procalcitonin in the therapeutic effect evaluation of severe bacterial pneumonia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究血清降钙素原(PCT)变化率在指导重症细菌性肺炎疗效评估中的作用。方法本研究为前瞻单中心观察性研究。纳入2010年北京协和医院ICU中收治的重症细菌性肺炎患者。人选65例,平均年龄(62±16)岁。诊断为重症社区获得性肺炎5例,院内获得性肺炎32例和呼吸机相关性肺炎28例。入选时临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)7.9±1.8;急性生理及慢性健康状态(APACHE)Ⅱ评分14.5±5.3。有效组44例,失败组21例。在人选时、72h、第7天、治疗结束时测定血清PCT水平。治疗结束后5d内按照卫生部抗菌药物临床研究指导原则完成疗效评估,分为有效(包括治愈及改善)和失败。采用SPSSl3.0进行统计分析。结果两组患者在入选、72h、第7天和治疗结束时的PCT及72hPCT变化率依次为(3.83±2.18)比(4.23±2.64)μg/L(t=1.249,P=0.387)、(2.44±1.05)比(3.48±1.75)μg/L(t=-1.959,P=0.045)、(1.15±0.87)比(3.41±1.58)μg/L(t=-2.904,P=0.006)、(0.51±0.17)比(2.63±1.08)μg/L(t=-3.772,P=0.000)及(32.5±12.4)%vs(14.5±7.1)%(t=-2.376,P=0.009)。72hPCT变化率预测疗效的受试者工作特征曲线下面积AUC为0.823(P=0.002),白细胞、中性粒细胞百分比、体温、72hPCT绝对值预测疗效的AUC依次为0.575,0.543,0.521,0.597(P〉0.05)。多元回归分析显示72hPCT变化率〈30.8%(OR15.2,95%CI3.3-21.7,P=0.01)是影响疗效的独立危险因素之一。PCT变化率(下降〉30.8%)联合CPIS(〈6分)预测疗效的AUC为0.910,敏感度85.2%,特异度92.5%。结论72hPCT变化率可指导重症细菌性肺炎早期治疗效果评估,联合CPIS可进一步提高其预测价值。 Objective The aim of this study is to define if early change of procalcitonin (PCT) may inform about the efficacy evaluation of severe bacterial pneumonia. Methods A prospective, single-center, observational study was conducted in patients with severe bacterial pneumonia admitted to ICU in 2010 years. PCT samples were collected in baseline ,72 hours ,7 days and the ending in the duration of therapy. The efficacy evaluation was assessed at the end of treatment 5 days after and divided into the efficacy group and nonefficacy group according to the guiding principle of clinical research on antibacterial drugs by the Ministry of Health. Sixty-five patients with a mean age of (62. 1 ± 15.9 ) years were evaluated. Five patients were severe community acquired pneumonia, 32 patients nosocomial pneumonia and 28 patients ventilator associated pneumonia. The clinical pulmonary infection score(CPIS) was 7.9 ± 1.8;APACHE I score was 14. 5 ±5.3. There were 44 patients as the efficacy group and 21 patients as the nonefficacy group. SPSS13.0 was used to analyse the results. Results The PCT levels between efficacy group and nonefficacy group were (3.83±2.18)vs(4.23±2.64) μg/L (t=1.249, P=0.387),(2.44±1.05)vs(3.48±1.75) μg/L (t= -1.959, P=0.045),(1.15 ±0.87) vs (3.41 ± 1.58)μg/L (t = -2.904, P=0.006),and (0.51 ±0. 17) vs (2.63 ±1.08) μg/L (t = -3.772, P=0.000) in baseline, 72 hours,7 days and the ending in the duration of therapy. The change of PCT within the first 72 hours were ( 32. 5 ± 12.4 ) % vs( 14. 5 ± 7. 1 ) % . The area under receiver operating characteristics curve ( AUC ) of prediction clinical efficacy of the change of PCT within the first 72 hours was 0. 823 (P = 0. 002), the AUC of white blood cell, the neuter granulocyte percentage, body temperature and PCT level within 72 hours were 0. 575,0. 543, 0. 521,0. 597, respectively (P 〉 0. 05). In multivariate analyses, the change of PCT 〈 30. 8% (odds ratio, 15.2, 95% confidence interval,3.3-21.7, P = 0. 01 ) was independent risk factors of effect predictor. The changes of PCT within the first 72 hours ( 〉 30. 8% ) combined with CPIS( 〈 6) were the best performance to predict clinical efficacy with a AUC of 0. 910, sensitivity of 85.2% and specificity of 92. 5%. Conclusions The change of PCT within the first 72 hours can be used early to evaluate the effect in bacterial pneumonia. Especially, combined with CPIS can further improve the prediction value.
出处 《中华检验医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第7期615-619,共5页 Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
关键词 肺炎 细菌性 降钙素 蛋白质前体 治疗结果 Pneumonia, bacterial Calcitonin Protein precursors Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1MarshallJC, Reinhart K, International Sepsis Forum. Biomarkers of sepsis. Crit Care Med, 2009, 37 :2290-2298.
  • 2Simon L, Gauvin F, Amre DK, et al. Serum procalcitonin and C?reactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis, 2004, 39: 206-217.
  • 3石岩,刘大为.降钙素原在全身性感染诊治中的研究进展[J].中华内科杂志,2011,50(5):444-446. 被引量:93
  • 4Tang BM, Eslick GD, CraigJC, et al. Accuracy of procalcitonin for sepsis diagnosis in critically ill patients: systematic review and metaanalysis. Lancet Infect Dis, 2007,7 :210-217.
  • 5Bouadma L, Luyt CE, Tubach F, et al. Use of procalcitonin to reduce patients I exposure to antibiotics in intensive care units (PRORATA trial): a multi centre randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2010, 375:463474.
  • 6Christ-Crain M, Muller B. Procalcitonin in bacterial infections--hype, hope, more or less? Swiss Med Wkly, 2005, n .41-41i().
  • 7医院获得性肺炎诊断和治疗指南(草案)[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,1999,22(4):201-208. 被引量:2167
  • 8American Thoracic Society, Infectious Disease Society of America. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. AmJ Respir Crit Care Med, 2005, 171 :388416.
  • 9Dellinger RP, Levy MM, CarletJM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock :2008. Crit Care Med, 2008, 36 :296-327.
  • 10卫生部抗生素临床药理基地.抗菌药物临床研究指导原则.中国临床药理学杂志,1987,2:189-191.

二级参考文献30

  • 1Müller B,Becker KL.Procalcitonin:how a hormone became a marker and mediator of sepsis.Swiss Med Wkly,2001,131:595-602.
  • 2Becker KL,Nylén ES,White JC,et al.Clinical review 167:Procalcitonin and the calcitonin gene family of peptides in inflammation,infection,and sepsis:a journey from calcitonin back to its precursors.J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2004,89:1512-1525.
  • 3Castelli GP,Pognani C,Meisner M,et al.Procalcitonin and Creactive protein during systemic inflammatory response syndrome,sepsis and organ dysfunction.Crit Care,2004,8:R234-242.
  • 4Endo S,Aikawa N,Fujishima S,et al.Usefulness of procalcitonin serum level for the discrimination of severe sepsis from sepsis:a multicenter prospective study.J Infect Chemother,2008,14:244-249.
  • 5Harbarth S,Holeckova K,Froidevaux C,et al.Diagnostic value of procalcitonin,interleukin-6,and interleukin-8 in critically ill patients admitted with suspected sepsis.Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2001,164:396-402.
  • 6Simon L,Gauvin F,Amre DK,et al.Serum procalcitonin and Creactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infection:a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Infect Dis,2004,39:206-217.
  • 7Uzzan B,Cohen R,Nicolas P,et al.Procalcitonin as a diagnostic test for sepsis in critically ill adults and after surgery or trauma:a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crit Care Med,2006,34:1996-2003.
  • 8Oberhoffer M,Stonans I,Russwurm S,et al.Procalcitonin expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and its modulation by lipopolysaccharides and sepsisrelated cytokines in vitro.J Lab Clin Med,1999,134:49-55.
  • 9Gibot S,Cravoisy A,Levy B,et al.Soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells and the diagnosis of pneumonia.N Engl J Med,2004,350:451-458.
  • 10Tejera A,Santolaria F,Diez ML,et al.Prognosis of community acquired pneumonia (CAP):value of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1) and other mediators of the inflammatory response.Cytokine,2007,38:117-123.

共引文献2278

同被引文献126

引证文献13

二级引证文献217

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部